PEA RESPONSE TO SALT AND THERMAL STRESSES IN DEPENDENCE ON PRELIMINARY IONIZING RADIATION IMPACT
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1201.547
Abstract
It is important to find specific and non-specific aspects of plant response reactions during adaptation, to understand the pathways of signaling systems crossing and their interaction. To detect the points of signaling systems interaction a set of experiments was suggested. The pea seedlings were irradiated by X-ray. Additionally, some seedlings after irradiation were exposed to hyper thermal stress or to the osmotic stress. The aim of research was to study the modifying effect of ionizing radiation on other abiotic stress factors impact such as salinity and temperature. Morphometric measurements were used to estimate plant’s response on stresses. These data can integrally characterize molecular, genetic, structural and metabolic changes in pea seedlings on their initial growth phase. For this purpose, the average growth rate of roots was compared with the theoretically expected growth rate that was calculated as an additive interaction of stress factors. “Crosstalk” means the growth of organism’s resistance to one stress factor as a result of adaptation to another stressor. It is a result of interconnection and “dialogue” of various signal systems of plant. The time frame of the modifying influence of one stressor had the greatest impact on the appearance of another was found. The level of deviation from additive to synergistic or antagonistic model of stressors interaction may indicate the crosstalk effect. It was shown that crosstalk is most pronounced on second and eighth days after treatments impact. Preliminary ionizing irradiation of seedlings could modify and increase the resistance to subsequently osmotic or thermal stress impact but this phenomenon was short-term. At other phases of experiment the expected growth rates and empirical average growth rates nearly matched. It may be explained by crosstalk pathways switching.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Українська)References
1. Drok E.N., Mamenko P.M., Omelchuk S.V., Kosakivska I.V. Features of symbiotic system and production of ethylene in varieties of Glycine max (L.) Merr., differing on résistance to abiotic stressors. The Bull. Charkovsky Natl. Agr. Univ, 2014; 3(33): 21-28. (In Ukrainian) | |
| |
2. El-Esawi M. Introductory Chapter: Hormonal Regulation in Plant Development and Stress Tolerance, Phytohormones - Signaling Mechanisms and Crosstalk in Plant Development and Stress Responses, Dr. Mohamed El-Esawi (Ed.), InTech, 2017. | |
| |
3. Fujita M., Fujita Y., Noutoshi Y. Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses: a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2006; 9(4): 436-442. | |
| |
4. Hossain Z., Nouri M.Z., Komatsu S. Plant cell organelle proteomics in response to abiotic stress. Proteome Res, 2012; 11(1): 37-48. | |
| |
5. Kolupaev Yu.Ye., Kosakivska I.V. The role of signal systems and phytohormones in realization of plants stress response. Ukr. Bot. J, 2008; 65(3): 418-430. (In Ukrainian) | |
| |
6. Kumar P., Sharma V., Yadav P., Singh B. Gamma Ray Irradiation for Crop Protection Against Salt Stress. Defence Life Science Journal, 2017; 2(3): 292-300. | |
| |
7. Martins A.C. Change and Aging Senescence as an Adaptation. PLoS ONE, 2011; 6(9): 1-12. | |
| |
8. Mundy J., Nielsen H.B., Brodersen Р. Crosstalk. Trends in Plant Science, 2006; 11(2): 63-64. | |
| |
9. Nguyen D., Rieu I., Mariani C., van Dam N. How plants handle multiple stresses: hormonal interactions underlying responses to abiotic stress and insect herbivory. Plant Mol. Biol, 2016; 91: 727-740. | |
| |
10. Pahomova V.M., Chernov E.A. Some features of the inductive phase of nonspecific plant adaptive syndrome. Proceedings of the RAS (Biol.), 1996; 6: 705-715. (Іn Russian) | |
| |
11. Qi W., Zhang L., Xu H., Wang L., Jiao Z. Physiological and molecular characterization of the enhanced salt tolerance induced by low-dose gamma irradiation in Arabidopsis seedlings. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 2014; 25(2): 1010-1015. | |
| |
12. Rashydov N., Kliuchnikov O., Seniuk O., Gorovyy L., Zhidkov A., Ribalka V., Berezhna V., Bilko N., Sakada V., Bilko D., Borbuliak I., Kovalev V., Krul M., Petelin G. Radiobiological Characterization Environment around Object "Shelter". In book: Nuclear Power Plant. Soon Heung Chang (Ed.), 2012; 7: 231-279. | |
| |
13. Sergeeva L., Bronnikova L. Proline-mediated tobacco reactions on salinization impsct. East. Europ. L. Ukrainka National Univ. (Bot.), 2016; 12(4): 15-19. | |
| |
14. Sharma R., Vleesschauwer D., Sharma M., Ronald P. Recent Advances in Dissecting Stress-Regulatory Crosstalk in Rice. Molecular Plant, 2013; 6(2): 250-260. | |
| |
15. Stork P., Schmitt J. Crosstalk between cAMP and MAP kinase signaling in the regulation of cell proliferation. Trends in Cell Biology, 2002; 12(6): 258-266. | |
| |
16. Taylor J.E., McAinsh M.R. Signalling crosstalk in plants: emerging issues. J. Exp. Bot, 2004; 55(395): 147-149. | |
| |
17. Trindade L., Aigaki T., Peixoto A. A novel classification system for evolutionary aging theories. Front Genet, 2013; 4(25): 1-8. | |
| |
18. Tripathi D., Tanaka K. A crosstalk between extracellular ATP and jasmonate signaling pathways for plant defense. Plant Signal Behav. 2018 [Epub ahead of print] | |
| |
19. Wei J., van Loon J.J., Gols R. Reciprocal crosstalk between jasmonate and salicylate defence-signalling pathways modulates plant volatile emission and herbivore host-selection behavior. J. Exp Bot, 2014; 65(12): 3289-3298. |
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 O. G. Nesterenko, N. M. Rashydov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.