FEATURES OF GRASS AND SUBSHRUB REPRODUCTION IN FOREST PHYTOCOENOSES

I. M. Kovalenko


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1001.471

Abstract


The north-east region of Ukraine stands out from the other regions including the Carpa­thians for high forest cover. Grass and subshrub layer significantly affects the formation of tree layer (the early stages of forest demutation). The study is conducted in forest phytocoenoses of the National Nature Park “Desniansko-Starogutsky” and the adjacent territories. The study objects are model plant species of grass and subshrub layer (Aegopodium podagraria L., Asarum europaeum L., Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull, Carex pilosa Scop., Molinia caerulea (L.) Moench., Stellaria holostea L., Vaccinium myrtillus L., Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.), each presented by 3–5 coenopopulations. Two main types of reproduction are found in forest grasses and subshrubs: seed (or by spores in spore-bearing plants) and vegetative. In case of generative reproduction, an important biological characteristic is the so-called reproductive effort, which characterizes the contribution of organic matters and energy to the reproductive process. An important common feature of reproduction of the vast majority of forest grasses is the ability for vegetative reproduction and clone formation. It is established that the main indicators of generative reproduction of clone forming plants of grass and subshrub layer depend on plant species, and are influenced by the ecological and coenotic factors. It has been found that the smallest contribution (2 %) to the reproduction organs is characteristic of C. vulgaris, and the highest contribution (almost 50 %) is found in the coenopopulations of M. сaerulea. Overall, generativity of the studied plants of grass and subshrub layer is determined by the ecological and coenotic factors, and, therefore, is consistently varied from association to association.


Keywords


reproduction, forest ecosystems, grasses and subshrubs, reproductive effort

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Andreeva E.N., Bakal I.Yu., Gorshkov V.V., Lianguzova I.V. Study methods of forest communities. St. Petersburg: Chemistry Research Institute of the State University, 2002. 240 p. (In Russian)

2. Andriyenko T.L. Phytodiversity of Ukrainian Polissya and its protection. Kyiv: Phytosociocentre, 2006. 316 p. (In Ukrainian)

3. Ashman T.L., Knight T.M., Steets J.A. et al. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology, 2004; 85(9): 2408-2421.
https://doi.org/10.1890/03-8024

4. Barrett S.C., Helenurm K. The reproductive biology of boreal forest herbs. I. Breeding system and pollination. Canad. J. Bot, 1987; 65: 2036-2046.
https://doi.org/10.1139/b87-278

5. Bashtovoi N.G. Strategy of gout weed and Solomon's seal protection in cenopopulations under the conditions of anthropogenic loads. In: Plant populations: principles of organization and problems of nature protection. Yoshkar-Ola, 1991. P. 67. (In Russian)

6. Bierzychudek P. Life histories and demography of sade-tolerant temperate forest herbs: a review. New Phytol, 1982; 90: 757-776.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03285.x

7. Bogdanova N.E. Features of seed dispersal of model grass species in a coniferous-deciduous forest. In: Actual problems of geobotany. Part 1. Petrozavodsk, 2007: 67-70. (In Russian)

8. Bulokhov A.D., Solomeshch A.I. Ecological and floristic classification of the forests of southern Nechernozemie of Russia. Bryansk: BGU, 2003. 359 p. (In Russian)

9. Dahlgren J.P., Zeipel H., Ehrlen J. Variation in vegetative and flowering phenology in a forest herb caused by environmental heterogeneity. Amer. J. Botan, 2007; 94(9): 1570-1576.
https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.9.1570
PMid:21636522

10. Fegri K., Van der Pale L. Fundamentals of ecology of pollination. Moscow: Mir, 1962. 379 p. (In Russian)

11. Ghazoul J. Pollen and seed dispersal among dispersed plants. Biol. Rev, 2005; 80: 413-443.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006731
PMid:16094807

12. Honcharenko I.V. Vegetation analysis of the north-eastern forest-steppe of Ukraine. Kyiv: Phytosociocentre, 2003. 203 p. (In Ukrainian)

13. Hryhora I.M., Solomakha V.A. Vegetation of Ukraine (ecological-coenotic, floristic and geographical study). Kyiv: Phytosociocentre, 2005. 452 p. (In Ukrainian)

14. Kovalenko I.M. Ecology of the lower layer plants of forest ecosystems: monograph. Sumy: University Book, 2015. 360 p. (In Ukrainian)

15. Kovalenko I.M. Generative reproduction of clone forming plants of grass and subshrub layer under forest phytocenosis of National Nature Park "Desniansko-Starogutsky". In: Actual problems of botany and ecology. Kyiv: Phytosociocentre, 2005. P. 130-132. (In Ukrainian)

16. Kurnaev S.F. The main forest types of the middle Russian plain. Moscow: Nauka, 1968. 355 p. (In Russian)

17. Levina R.E. The ways of fruit and seed dispersal. Moscow: Nauka, 1957. 358 p. (In Russian)

18. Levina R.E. Reproductive biology of seed plants. Moscow: Nauka, 1981. 96 p. (In Russian)

19. Matuszkiewicz W. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski. Warszawa: PWN, 2001. 537 p.

20. Onyshchenko V.A. Forests of order Fagetalia sylvaticae in Ukraine. Kyiv: Alterpress, 2009. 212 p. (In Ukrainian)

21. Paal T.V., Paal Ya.L. The influence of phytogenic tree fields on the yield of bilberry. Plant Resources, 1981; 17(1): 68-74.

22. Palkina T.A., Petrov V.V. Soil stock of viable seeds in the three forest phytocenosises of different origin. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists (Biological Series), 1986; 91(2): 144-152. (In Russian)

23. Panchenko S.M. Forest vegetation of National Nature Park "Desniansko-Starogutsky". Sumy: University Book, 2013. 312 p. (In Ukrainian)

24. Persival M.S. Floral biology. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1965. 243 р.

25. Petrov V.V. Content of dormant viable seeds in the soil of some types of coniferous forests. Vestnik MGU (Biological Series), 1981; 3: 308-312. (In Russian)

26. Petrov V.V. Some results of studying the soil supply of viable seeds of plants in the forests near Moscow. Reports of Moscow Society of Naturalists (Zoology and Botany Series), 1983; 126-128. (In Russian)

27. Petrov V.V. Content of dormant viable seeds in the soil of indigenous old-growth spruce fo­rests. Botanical Journal, 1986; 71(9): 1227-1230

28. Shutov V.V. Structure, dynamics and fruiting of populations of subshrub plants. Kostroma: KGTU, 2000. 100 p.

29. Solomakha V.A. Syntaxonomy of vegetation of Ukraine. Kyiv: Phytosociocentre, 2008. 296 p. (In Ukrainian)

30. Taki H., Kevan P. G., Ascher J. S. Landscape effects of forest loss in a pollination system. Landscape Ecol, 2007; 22: 1575-1587
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9153-z

31. Whigham D.E. Ecology of woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forest. Ann. Rev. of Ecol., Evol. a. Syst, 2004; 35: 583-621.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105708

32. Zlobin Yu.A. Reproductive effort. Embryology of Flowering Plants, 2000; 3: 251-258.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Studia biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.