PROBIOTIC PROPERTIES OF BACTERIA OF LACTOBACILLUS GENUS ISOLATED FROM THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT OF RABBITS

Yu. M. Pohilko, N. O. Kravchenko


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1201.535

Abstract


The probiotic properties (antagonistic and adhesion) of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of rabbits were studied. It was established that the studied antagonistic activity to pathogenic and conditionally pathogenic microorga­nisms was observed in the following strains: Lactobacillus lactis 4/1, Lactobacillus casei 5/4, Lactobacillus helveticus 13/2, Lactobacillus plantarum 17/2, Lactobacillus plantarum 17/3, Lactobacillus acidophilus 49/1. The level of adhesion of lactic acid bacteria isolate, isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of rabbits, to erythrocytes of rabbit, mouse, pig, cattle, human blood was studied. The highest level of adhesion (83 %) was observed in erythrocytes of rabbits, low (53 %) – in erythrocytes of cattle. The possibi­lity of using the L. helveticus 13/2 strain for the prevention and treatment of salmonella infections has been shown. Introduction to research animals of lactic acid bacteria before infection with pathogens of salmonellosis allowed to save 90–100 % of experimental animals. With the use of lactic acid bacteria after infection of salmonellosis to animals, the safety of the herd was 67–73 %.


Keywords


probiotics, lactic acid bacteria, antagonistic activity, adhesion, salmonellosis

References


1. Arena M.P., Capozzi V., Spano G., Fiocco D. The potential of lactic acid bacteria to colonize biotic and abiotic surfaces and the investigation of their interactions and mechanisms. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2017; 101(7): 2641-2657.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8182-z
PMid:28213732

2. Centre for disease prevention and control et al. Joint opinion on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) focused on zoonotic infections. Scientific opinion of the European centre for disease prevention and control; Scientific opinion of the panel on biological hazards; Opinion of the Committee for medicinal products for veterinary use; Scientific opinion of the scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks. ESA Journal, 2009; 7(11): 1372.
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1372

3. Chiu Y.H., Lin S.L., Tsai J.J., Lin M.Y. Probiotic actions on diseases: implications for therapeutic treatments. Food Funct, 2014; 5(4): 625-634.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fo60600g
PMid:24549263

4. De Man J.C., Rogosa M., Sharpe M.E. A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol, 1960; 23: 130-138.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1960.tb00188.x

5. Donaldson G.P., Lee S.M., Mazmanian S.K. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2016; 14(1): 20-32.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3552
PMid:26499895 PMCid:PMC4837114

6. Enrica P. Interactive probiotics. Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology University of Torino. Italy: CRC Press, 2014. P. 274.

7. Hill C., Guarner F., Reid G. et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2014; 11(8): 506-514.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66
PMid:24912386

8. Irkitova A.N., Kagan, Ya.R. Methods for determining the antagonistic activity of lactic acid bacteria. Actual problems of machinery and technology of milk processing, 2012, 9: 226-236. (In Russian)

9. Lavrik G.S. Characterization of the adhesive properties of lactobacilli-clinical isolates and constituent biologics. Annals of the Mechnikov Institute, 2015, 2: 200-203. (In Ukrainian)

10. Law of Ukraine "On Veterinary Medicine" dated November 16, 2006 No. 361-V (with amendments as of September 18, 2008 No. 538-VI).

11. Lensen H., Roos S., Jonsson H. et al. Role of Lactobacillus reuteri cell and mucus-binding protein A (CmbA) in adhesion to intestinal epithelial cella and mucus in vitro. Microbiology, 2014, 160(4): 671-681.
https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.073551-0
PMid:24473252

12. Motulsky H. Intuitive biostatistics: a nonmathematical guide to statistical thinking. USA, Oxford University Press, 2014. P. 517

13. Pohilko Yu.M., Kravchenko N.O. Composition of the microbocenosis of the gastrointestinal tract of young rabbits depending on the diet. Scientific and Technical Bulletin, 2016; 17(1): 141-146. (In Ukrainian)

14. Pokhilko Yu. M., Kravchenko N.O. Isolation from the digestive system of rabbits lactic acid bacteria, promising for the development probiotic preparations. Biological Resources and Nature Management, 2016; 8(5-6): 63-66. (In Ukrainian)

15. Reznikov A. Ethical problems in carrying out experimental medical and biological studies in animals. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2001, 11: 30-33. (In Ukrainian)

16. Romanov V.E., Ivonin A.G., Bondarenko A.L., Oborin V.A., Nekhoroshkina E.L. [Method of identification of the Bacteria-Binding Activity of Erythrocytes]. Patent 2360969. (In Russian)

17. Shakhmardanov M.Z.. On the issue of antibacterial therapy of the gastrointestinal form of salmonellosis. Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, 2013;1: 4-7. (In Russian)

18. Zaritsky A.M., Glushkevich T. G., Bubalo, V.O. The actuality of salmonella in Ukraine and the prospect of combating it. Infectious Diseases, 2016, 3: 5-9. (In Ukrainian)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Yu. M. Pohilko, N. O. Kravchenko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.