ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL ACTIVITY OF OIL-POLLUTED SOD-PODZOLIC SOIL BY ACTION OF PHYTOMELIORANT CAREX HIRTA L.

L. V. Bunio, O. M. Tsvilynjuk


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0803.370

Abstract


In the field and laboratory experience oil pollution influence (5 %) on biological activity of sod-podzolic soil of Borislav with phytorecultavion activity of plants C. hirta was estimated. The carried out examinations have demonstrated low cellulose activity as in the background and model soil. In the oil-polluted soil, we determined higher resistance of urease compared to cellulase. Cellulase activity decreased, and urease activity increased at the oil pollution. Potential biological activity was higher in comparison with actual both at background and in oil-polluted soil. Oil contamination incremented anaerobic process of cellulose decomposing. Destruction of cellulose of filter disks from a soil surface was slower, than filter disks from beneath soil. The carried out examinations have demonstrated, that growth of C. hirta influenced variation of biological activity of oil-polluted soil. Growth of plants C. hirta enriched biological properties of the oil-polluted soil. In rhizosphere region of plants actual and potential activity was higher compared to a space between rows. Cellulase and urease activity of the background and oil-polluted soil in rhizosphere region of plants C. hirta was incremented compared to a row-spacing.


Keywords


sod-podzolic soil, actual and potential activity, oil contamination, rhizosphere, row-spacing, Carex hirta L.

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Aristovskaya T.V., Chugunova N.V. Rapid method for determining the biological activity of the soil. Soil Science, 1989; 11: 142-147. (In Russian)

2. Arzhannikov V. P., Gromova O. V. Agromelioration - an effective method of restoring the biocapacity of contaminated lands in the North. In: V Intern. conf. "The development of the North and the updating problems remediation (5-8 June 2001). Syktyvkar, 2001: 8-9. (In Russian)

3. Aznauryan D.K. Changing ecological and biological properties of oil polluted soils of the south Russia: PhD. Rostov-on-Don, 2009. 151 p. (In Russian)

4. Condition soils Ukraine. Series: "Environmental Protection". In: Tarariko O. G. (Ed.). Kyiv: Aspect-Poligraf, 2005; 3 (15): 32 р. (In Ukrainian)

5. Demyanyuk O.S., Sherstoboyeva O.V. Potential cellulolytic activity of soils of different Ukraine agroecosystems. Agroecology Journal, 2005; 5: 56-59. (In Ukrainian)

6. Dobrovolskiy G.V. Place and role of soil science in studying and solving environmental problems today. Visnyk of Moscow University. Soil Science, 2006. 17(2): 3-7. (In Russian)

7. Dolgova L.G. Activity of some oxidoreductases under pollution. Reports of 5 delegating the company Union Congress of Soil Science. Minsk, 1977; 2: 267-269. (In Russian)

8. Emtsev V.T. Microbiology. Moskow: Drofa, 2005. 445 p. (In Russian)

9. Fedoretc N.G., Medvedeva M.V. Methodology study of soils in urban areas. Petrozavodsk: Karelian Research Centre of RAS, 2009. 84 p. (In Russian)

10. Feoktistova I.D. Evaluation of the ecological state of soils in urban areas contaminated with oil and heavy metals (on the example of Vladimir): Synopsis PhD. Vladimir, 2012. 22 p. (In Russian)

11. Feoktistova I.D., Sahno O.N., Zhuravleva A.G. Ecological status of soils evaluation in urban areas polluted with oil. Bulletin of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2011; 13(1 (5): 1233-1235. (In Russian)

12. Gayvoronskiy V.G. Kolesnikov S.I. Pollution modeling of chernozem and brown forest soil with fuel oil to determine its environmentally safe concentration. Math. Universities. North-Caucasus. Region. Natures. Science, 2008; 4: 86-88. (In Russian)

13. Hazeev F.H. Soil enzymology methods. Moscow: Nauka, 2005. 252 p. (In Russian)

14. Inisheva L.I., Ivleva S.N., Shcherbakova T.A. Guidelines for the determination of the enzymatic activity of soils and peats. Tomsk: Publishing of Tomsk University, 2003. 122 p. (In Russian)

15. Jura N.M., Terek O.I. Tsvilynyuk O.M. Method remediation of oil polluted soils. Patent for utility model 16345 Ukraine, IPC (2006) 79 A01V / A01V 00 79/02 (2006.01) A01S 21/00, 2006; 8: 7 p. (In Ukrainian)

16. Kabirov R.R., Safiullina L.M., Kireeva N.A. et al. Evaluating the biological activity of oil-polluted soils using a complex index. Eurasian Soil Science, 2012; 45(2): 157-161. (In Russian)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229312020123

17. Karyagina L.A. Microbiological basis for improving soil fertility. Minsk: Science and Technology, 1983. 181 p. (In Russian)

18. Kireeva N.A., Vodop'yanov V. V., Miftahova A.M. Biological Activity of oil-contaminated soil. Ufa: Guillem, 2001. 376 p. (In Russian)

19. Kiss S. Advences in soil enzymology (Part I-II). Studia Univesitates Bades-Bolyai Biologia, 2001; 1: 3-48.

20. Kiss S., Dragan-Bularda M., Pasca D. Enzymolodgy of technogenic soils. Cluj, 1993. 96 p.

21. Kolesnikov S.I., Kazeev K.Sh., Tatosyan M.L. et al. The effect of pollution with oil and oil products on the biological status of ordinary chernozems. Soil Science, 2006; 39 (5): 552-556. (In Russian)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229306050127

22. Kolesnikov S. I., Tlehas Z. R., Kazeev K. Sh. et al. Effect of Contamination with Heavy Metals and Oil on the Biological Properties of Leached Vertic Chernozem. Agrokhimija, 2010; 7: 62-67. (In Russian)

23. Margesin R., Zimmerbauer A., Schinner F. Monitoring of bioremedia-tion by soil biological activities. Chemosphere, 2000; 40: 339-346.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00218-0

24. Miftahova A.M. Self-cleaning and soil fertility restoration of natural and anthropogenic ecosystems in terms of oil pollution. In: PhD. Ufa: Institute of Ecology of the Volga Basin Russia Academy of Sciences, 2006. 361р. (In Russian)

25. Naumovska O.I., Yevpak I.V., Manishevska N.M. et al. Biological activity of typical chernozem soil in the application of technology growing crops. Visnyk Kharkov National Agrarian University. Soil Science, 2004; 6: 141-145. (In Ukrainian)

26. Passa D., Kiss S. Enzymatic potential of some highmoor peats froom Romania. Proceeding 10th International Peat Congress. Bremen, Stuttgart, 1996; 2: 548-553.

27. Pikovskiy Y.I., Gennadiev A.N., Chernyanskiy S.S. et al. The problem of diagnostics and standardization of the levels of soil pollution by oil and oil products. Soil Science, 2003; 36(9): 1010-1017. (In Russian)

28. Rakhimova E.R., Garusov A.V., Zaripova S.K. Biological activity of oil-contaminated soil upon its salinization. Soil Science, 2005; 4: 481-485. (In Russian)

29. Rudenko S.S., Kostishun S.S., Morozova T.V. General Ecology. (Part II). Natural Terrestrial Ecosystems. Chernivtsi: Books XXI, 2008. 308 p. (In Ukrainian)

30. Rylova N.G., Stepus N.F. The change of cellulose soil activity as a result of pollution with heavy metals. Vestnik of Udmurt. University, 2005; 10: 65-70. (In Russian)

31. Samosova S.M., Filchikova V.I., Kiprova R.R. et al. Аctivity microflora of chernozem in the oil pollution. Kazan: Dep. VINITI, 1983. 19 р. (In Russian)

32. Schemelinina T.N. Biological Activity north contaminated soils at different stages of their recovery and recultivation: Synopsis PhD. Voronezh: Institute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, 2008. 22 p. (In Russian)

33. Scherbakov V.J., Mishin S.N., Pochkolina S.V. Microbiological activity of soil and soil microbial symbiosis with soybeans under fertilizers and herbicides. Visnyk of Poltava State Agricultural Institute, 1999. 13-14. (In Ukrainian)

34. Sevost'yanov A.V. Mass valuation of urban lands in the works in urban cadastre. Training and methodological support vocational training land and real estate appraisers. Moscow: Moscow State University of Land Management, 2001; 9: 68 р. (In Russian)

35. Shusteruk T.Z. Environmental assessment of human impacts on soil biotic activity (for agroecosystems Ukraine example): PhD. Kyiv, 2007. 27 p. (In Ukrainian)

36. Tarasenko E.M. Biological activity and toxicity of soils at oil contamination and remediation: PhD. Ufa, 2006. 145 р. (In Russian)

37. Tatosyan M.L. Oil and oil products pollution effect on the biological activity of chernozem: PhD. Rostov-on-Don, 2003. 175 р. (In Russian)

38. Trishina G. G., Antonik I. P. Assessment of Ecological Security of Krivbas soil during operation of the oil pumping station "Shiroke" PAT "UkrTransNafta". Visnyk of the Kryvyi Rih National University, 2012; 32: 127-132 (In Ukrainian)

39. Tsaytler M.J. Changes in the structure Carex hirta cenopopulations in terms of oil pollution on Boryslav oil field ecotypes. Ecology and Noosferolohiya, 2000; 9(1-2): 127-132. (In Ukrainian)

40. Tsvilynyuk O.M, Bunio L.V., Karpyn O.L. et al. Mycorrhizae as part of the survival stategy of Carex hirta L. ona crude oil contaminated soil. Visnyk of Lviv University. Series Biology, 2012; 60: 320-326. (In Ukrainian)

41. Yakovlev A. S. Biological diagnosis and monitoring of soils. Soil Science, 2000; 1: 70-79. (In Russian)

42. Yakovlev A.S., Nikulina Y.G. Ecological rating of the allowable residual oil content in soils of different land uses. Soil Science, 2013; 46 (2): 212-216. (In Russian)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229313020154

43. Zabelina O.N., Trifonova T.A. Аpplication of indicators biological activity in the environmental condition of urban soils. Collected Materials of the IV Intern. sci. conf. "Ecology of the Regions". Vladimir: VOOO VOI, 2012: 46-49. (In Russian)

44. Zenova G.M., Stepanov A.L., Lihacheva A.A. et al. Workshop on soil biology. Moscow: Moscow State University, 2002. 120 p. (In Russian)

45. Zvyagintsev D.G., Babieva I.P., Zenova G.M. Soils Biology. Moscow: Moscow State University, 2005. 445 р. (In Russian)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Studia biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.