MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF THE INFLORESCENCE IN GLADIOLUS IMBRICATUS L. AND IRIS SIBIRICA L. (IRIDACEAE)

Ch. Skrypec, A. Odintsova


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1101.514

Abstract


In the bracteose inflorescence of Gladiolus imbricatus and Iris sibirica, the distichous phyllotaxis and different level of morphological polyvariance were revealed. The spike-like inflorescence of Gladiolus imbricatus is composed of 8–14 flowers, all of them are turned to the same side during flowering. The inflorescence of Gladiolus imbricatus reveals morphological invariance and represents a simple spike-like raceme with flo­wers placed on very short pedicels. The bracts and prophylls in the inflorescence of Gladiolus imbricatus retain throughout the genesis. The inflorescence of Iris sibirica is composed of 1–3 rhipidia and reveals a high level of morphological polyvariance after the number of flowers, their location and flowering order. The most common is five-flowered inflorescence in two rhipidia. The spathae of rhipidia fall down at the beginning of flowering while bracts retain till the middle-time of fruit ripening. All leaves in the inflorescence of Iris sibirica except bracts of the lowest flowers of rhipidia, have prophyll structure. In the inflorescence of both species, the rudimental flowers were found, that are evidence of the potential larger size of the ancestral inflorescence.


Keywords


spike-like inflorescence, rhipidium, inflorescence habitus, morphological polyvariance, rudimental flowers

References


1. Artjuschenko Z., Theodorov Al. A. Organographia illustrata plantarum Vascularium. Inflorescence. Leninopoli: Nauka, 1979. 296 p. (In Russian)

2. Choob V.V. Patterns of flower and inflorescence architecture in Crocus L. (Iridaceae). Annali di Botanica, 2000; 58: 91-104.

3. Chugaeva V. Some questions of the seed reproduction of Iris sibirica L. and its cultivars. The international scientific conference: The role of botanical gardens in the conservation and enrichment of the biological diversity of Kaliningrad. Kaliningrad, 2004. 95-97. (In Russian)

4. Goldblatt P., Manning J., Rudall P. Iridaceae In: K. Kubitzki (Ed.) The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1998; 3: 295-325.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03533-7_37

5. Goldblatt P., Manning J. Radiation of Pollination Systems in the Iridaceae of sub-Saharan Africa. Annals of Botany, 2006; 97: 317-344.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcj040
PMid:16377653 PMCid:PMC2803647

6. Kuznetsova T., Pryakhina N., Yakovlev G. Inflorescences: Morphological Classification. Petersburg: Khim.-Farm. Inst, 1992. 121 p. (In Russian)

7. Notov A., Naumtsev Yu. Gladiolus imbricatus In: Pavlov V.N. Biological Flora of the Moscow Region. Moscow: Grif and K, 2003; 15: 31-49. (In Russian)

8. Podorozhniy D.S. Siberian Iris (Iris sibirica L.) in Ukraine (chorology, populations, ecological-phytocoenotic peculiarities and conservation). Kyiv: M.M. Gryshko National Botanic Garden, 2013. 20 р. (Іn Ukrainian)

9. Red Book of Ukraine. Flora. In: Y. P. Didukh (Ed.) Kyiv: Hlobalkonsaltynh, 2009. 900 р. (In Ukrainian)

10. Szőllősi R., Medvegy A., Benyes E. et al. Flowering phenology, floral display and reproductive success of Iris sibirica L. Acta Botanica Hungarica, 2011; 53(3-4): 409-422.
https://doi.org/10.1556/ABot.53.2011.3-4.20

11. Szőllősi R., Medvegy А., Nemeth A. et al. Intra-inflorescence variations in floral morphological and reproductive traits of Iris sibirica L. Acta Biologica Szegediensis, 2010; 54(2): 103-110.

12. Takhtajan A. Flowering Plants. Sec. Ed. Springer, 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9609-9

13. Tzvelev N.N. Family Iridaceae Juss. In: A. Takhtajan (Ed.) Plant Life. Moscow: Prosveschenie, 1982; 6: 180-194. (In Russian)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Studia biologica