BIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SPERMOGRAMS OF MEN OF DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS IN NORMAL AND PATHOLOGY IN LVIV REGION, UKRAINE

A. V. Tarnovska, A. B. Heneha


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1603.686

Abstract


Background. Analysis of the causes of infertility revealed an increase in the proportion of male factors over the past 20 years by an average of 10–12 %. World Health Organization data, which summarize the observations of many authors in recent years, show a decrease in male reproductive potential. The ejaculate parameters of the modern average man are steadily declining. For example, the concentration of germ cells in the seminal fluid has decreased three times, and this trend continues: the concentration of sperm decreases annually by about 2 %, and their motility – by 1.5 %. Not only is infertility a pressing problem in modern medicine, but also an important social issue, as it is associated with the mental state of men and the preservation of the family.
Materials and Methods. Spermograms were obtained during the study of patients in the clinic of reproductive medicine “Alternative Clinic” (Lviv, Ukraine). A total of 50 men were surveyed, including 16 men aged 20 to 29 (junior age group), 17 men aged 30 to 39 (middle age group) and 17 men 40 to 49 years old (senior age group), respectively. We found that out of the 16 men in the junior group, 4 spermograms corresponded to asthenozoospermia, and 12 – normozoospermia, of the 17 middle-aged group, 7 spermograms corresponded to asthenozoospermia, and 10 – normozoospermia and 10 men of the senior group to 15 spermograms asthenozoospermia, 2 – normospermia. Spermograms were evaluated by the following indicators: ejaculate count, viscosity, sperm count per 1 mL of ejaculate, sperm motility in categories “A” and “B”, the number of morphologically normal and morphologically degenerative sperm, Farris index. For control we took spermograms of patients with normozoospermia.
Results. Analyzing spermograms according to the studied indicators, we found a decrease in the amount of ejaculate in older men relative to the norm, which may indicate a lack of function of the seminal vesicles, prostate. According to the criteria for the number of sperm in 1 ml of ejaculate and the total number of sperm in the whole ejaculate, it was shown that in the spermograms of patients with asthenozoospermia of different age, these figures are much lower than normal. This indicates a decrease in male fertility in these diseases. Examining sperm motility according to the following criteria: “A” – fast translational movements and “B” – slow, sluggish translational movements, we found a decrease in these indicators compared with the norm in men of all ages with asthenozoospermia. This indicates a decrease in the quality of ejaculate in men, and, consequently, reduce the likelihood of fertilization. Examining sperm morphology, we assessed the number of normal and degenerative sperm. We have shown that in men of all ages with asthenozoospermia, the number of morphologically normal sperm is lower than in the control, and the number of morphologically degenerative sperm is increasing. Probably, such pathology can lead to a decrease in the possibility of fertilization and increases the likelihood of malformations in the fetus, if fertilization has occurred. Evaluating the spermograms of men in the study groups according to the Farris index, we found a significant reduction in this number in men with asthenozoospermia. This indicates a low probability of fertilization.
Conclusions. Male infertility (in particular, asthenozoospermia) can be caused by many different diseases in which there are deviations from the norms of qualitative and quantitative indicators of ejaculate. According to the data obtained from the observation of men, there is a tendency for the reduction of ejaculate volume, concentration and motility of sperm, as well as their morphological status.


Keywords


asthenozoospermia, normozoospermia, spermogram, male infertility

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acacio, B. D., Gottfried, T., Israel, R., & Sokol, R. Z. (2000). Evaluation of a large cohort of men presenting for a screening semen analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 73(3), 595-597. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00591-9
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Amini, L., Kahrobaie, M., Amiri-Farahani, L., & Haghani, H. (2020). The relationship between health life style and spermogram Indicators among infertile men: preliminary data. BMC Research Notes, 13(1), 278. doi:10.1186/s13104-020-05102-5
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Arya, S. T., & Dibb, B. (2016). The experience of infertility treatment: the male perspective. Human Fertility (Cambridge, England), 19(4), 242-248. doi:10.1080/14647273.2016.1222083
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Bozhedomov, V. A, Loran, O. B., Nikolaeva, M. A., & Sukhikh G. T. (2002). Vliyanie antispermalnyih antitel na muzhskuyu reprodutivnuyu funktsiyu [Influence of antisperm antibodies on male reproductive function]. Andrology and Genital Surgery, 2, 25-33. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Bragina, E. E., & Abdumalikov, R. A. (2002). Rukovodstvo po spermatologii [Guide to spermatology]. M.: Sorek-poligrafiya, 108. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Bragina, E. E., Abdumalikov, R. A., Kurilo, L. F., & Shileiko, L. V. (2000). Elektronno-mikroskopicheskoe izuchenie spermatozoidov cheloveka i ego rol v diagnostike muzhskogo besplodiya [Electron microscopic study of sperm and its role in the diagnosis of male infertility]. Problemy reprodukcii, 6(6), 62-71. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Chaika, V. K., & Chernysheva, L. E. (2001). Ekstrakorporalnoe oplodotvorenie i besplodie immunologicheskogo geneza (istoriya voprosa, obzor literaturyi) [Extracorporal fertilization and infertility of immunological genesis (history of the problem, literature review)]. Ukraïnskij medičnij al'manah, 4(4), 223-226. (In Russian)

Condic, M. L. (2002). The basics about stem cells. First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life, 30-34.
Google Scholar

ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (2008). Genetic aspects of female reproduction. Human reproduction update, 14(4), 293-307. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn009
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Eskenazi, B., Wyrobek, A. J., Kidd, S. A., Moore, L., Young, S. S., & Moore, D. (2001). Decreases in Human Semen Quality with Age Among Healthy Men (No. UCRL-JC-146551). Lawrence Livermore National Lab.(LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States).
Google Scholar

Gerasimov, A. M., & Polumiskov, D. M. (2003). Zavisimost podvizhnosti spermatozoidov ot biohimicheskih pokazateley eyakulyata [Dependence of sperm motility on biochemical parameters of ejaculate]. Problemy reprodukcii, 9(4), 79-81. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Gołąb, J., Jakóbisiak, M., & Lasek, W. (2002). Immunologia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Gorpinchenko, I. I., & Romanyuk, M. G. (2016). Male infertility: etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and modern methods of treatment. Health of Man, 1(56), 8-17. doi:10.30841/2307-5090.1(56).2016.95374 (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Gorpinchenko, I. I., Gurzhenko, Yu. N., & Klimenko, P. M. (2010). Prakticheskiy opyit kompleksnogo lecheniya bolnyih ekskretorno-toksicheskim besplodiem [Practical experience of complex treatment of patients with excretory-toxic infertility]. Novyny medytsyny ta farmatsii. 18(341). (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Gorpynchenko, I., Gurzhenko, Y., Spyrydonenko, V., & Lytvinets, E. (2019). Comparative characteristics of spermographic indicators in idiopathic forms of infertility in men from radioactively contaminated and conventionally clean regions of Ukraine. Problemy Radiatsiinoi Medytsyny ta Radiobiolohii, 24, 367-379. doi:10.33145/2304-8336-2019-24-367-379
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Hrynchuk, V. O. (2007). Cholovichyi faktor u bezplidnomu shliubi [The male factor in a barren marriage]. Health of men, 2, 183. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

Ivaniuta, L. I., & Ivaniuta, S. O. (2005). Neplidnist u shliubi (zdobutky ta perspektyvy) [Infertility in marriage (achievements and prospects)]. K.: Zadruha. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

Kehoe, S., Chitty, L., & Homfray, T. (Eds.). (2009). Reproductive Genetics. London: RCOG.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Lunyova, G. G., Lipkan, H. M., Zavadska, O. P., Fedorova, T. T., Oliinyk, O. A., & Pohorila, L. I. (2010). Doslidzhennia eiakuliatu v diahnostytsi cholovichoho nepliddia [Research of ejaculate in the diagnosis of male infertility]: K.: Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

Matzuk, M. M., & Lamb, D. J. (2008). The biology of infertility: research advances and clinical challenges. Nature Medicine, 14(11), 1197-1213. doi:10.1038/nm.f.1895
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Moskowitz, S. M., Chmiel, J. F., Sternen, D. L., Cheng, E., & Cutting, G. R. (2001). CFTR-Related Disorders. GeneReviews. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
Google Scholar

Ozelci, R., Yılmaz, S., Dilbaz, B., Akpınar, F., Akdag Cırık, D., Dilbaz, S., & Ocal, A. (2016). Seaso­nal variation of human sperm cells among 4,422 semen samples: A retrospective study in Turkey. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, 62(6), 379-386. doi:10.1080/19396368.2016.1225322
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Pastukhova, V. A. (2008). Morfofunktsionalnyi stan vnutrishnikh cholovichykh statevykh orhaniv pid vplyvom dii riznomanitnykh faktoriv [Morphofunctional state of internal organs under the influence of various factors]. Ukraïnskij medičnij al'manah, 11(6). 209-213. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

Punab, M., Poolamets, O., Paju, P., Vihljajev, V., Pomm, K., Ladva, R., Korrovits, P., & Laan, M. (2017). Causes of male infertility: a 9-year prospective monocentre study on 1737 patients with reduced total sperm counts. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 32(1), 18-31. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew284
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Sukhikh G. T., & Bozhedomov V. A. (2009). Muzhskoe besplodye. Praktycheskoe rukovodstvo dlia urolohov y hynekolohov [Male infertility. Practical guide for urologists and gynecologists]. Moscow: Eksmo. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Tarnovska, A. V., Henega, A. B., Semochko, O. M., Yaremchuk, M. M., & Yatskiv, O. M. (2018). Analysis of spermograms of middle-aged men (30-39 years old) with teratozoospermia and asthenozoospermia. Young Scientist, 9(61). 286-289. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

Tsvetkova, P., Babyuk, I., Ivanova, S., & Ilieva, I. (2012). Tsitogeneticheskoe issledovanie eyakulyata pri muzhskom besplodii [Cytogenetic study of ejaculate in male infertility]. Health of men, 3, 116-117. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Weber, R. F. A., Dohle, G. R., & Romijn, J. C. (2005). Clinical laboratory evaluation of male subfertility. Advances in Clinical Chemistry, 40, 317-364. doi:10.1016/s0065-2423(05)40008-6
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

World Health Organization. (2010). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 5th ed. World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44261
Yatskiv, O. M., & Tarnovska, A. V. (2012). Causes and forms of male infertility and methods of diagnosing ejaculate as the main indicator of male health. Visnyk of Lviv National University, Biological Series, 60, 4-20. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 A. V. Tarnovska, A. B. Heneha

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.