SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF RIVER PHYTOPLANKTON DIVERSITY UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ANTROPOGENIC FACTORS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF HNYLOPIAT RIVER OF DNIEPER BASIN)

Yu. S. Shelyuk, K. P. Goncharenko


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1101.513

Abstract


The article deals with spatial and temporal dynamics of specifics of phytoplankton in the Hnylopiat River. For the last 10 years, the share of Euglenophyta in the phytoplankton species diversity has increased, that might be regarded as the algal communities’ natural response to organic pollution. On the contrary, Bacillariophyta have reduced their share and the absolute number of species. The quantitative values of the phytoplankton have grown up, mainly due to blue-green algae mass vegetation. We have also recorded a decrease in the planktonic algal communities’ evenness, that was caused by cultural eutrophication, and a rise in the saprobity index, that is the evidence of water qua­lity aggravation. Planktonic algal communities are distinguished by well-marked discrete pattern along the river profile under the impact of human factors, that consists in the increase of number of cells owing to mass vegetation of Cyanoprokaryota in the regulated sections; reduction in the quantitative values of algae vegetation and the rise in the share of Euglenophyta in the species composition and biomass of algal communities. Besides, water quality aggravation in the section was affected by the wastewater treatment facilities of Berdychiv city. An increase in number of forms typical for soil and land substrata in the river section located downstream of the wastewater treatment facilities and are regulated by the pond.


Keywords


phytoplankton, diversity, Hnylopiat River, anthropogenic factors

References


1. Barinova S.S., Medvedeva L.A, Anisimova O.V. Biodiversity of Algae - Indicators of Environment. Tel-Aviv: PiliesStudio, 2006. 498 p. (In Russian)

2. Directive 2000/60 EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 23 October, establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities. EN, 22.12/2000 L. 327: 1-72.

3. Goncharenko K.P., Shelyuk Yu.S. The composition and primary production of phytoplankton Berdichev Reservoir (Hnylopiat River). Biological research - 2016 Zhytomyr: "Ruta", 2016: 104-105. (In Ukrainian)

4. Igoshin N.I. The Issues of Restoration and Protection of Streams and Lakes. Hydroecological Aspects. Kharkov: Burun Kniga, 2009. 240 p. (In Russian)

5. Paerl H.W. Nuisance phytoplankton blooms in coastal, estuarine, and inland waters. Limnol. Oceanogr, 1988; 33 (4): 823-847.
https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4_part_2.0823

6. Romanenko V.D. Methods of Hydroecological Research of Surface Waters Kyiv: LOGOS, 2006. 408 p. (In Ukrainian)

7. Sivaci R., Barinova S., Cüneyt N., Çobanoglu K. Ecological assessment of Great Lota Lake (Turkey) on the base of diatom communities. Afr. J. of Biotechnol, 2013; 12(5): 453-464.
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB12.671

8. Snizhko S.I., Orlov O.O. Hydrochemistry and Radiogeochemistry of Rivers and Swamps of Zhytomyr Region. Zhytomyr: "Volyn" Publishing House, 2002. 221 p. (In Ukrainian)

9. Tsarenko P.M., Wasser S.P., Nevo E. Algae of Ukraine: diversity, nomenclature, taxonomy, ecology and geography. Vol. 1. Cyanoprocaryota, Euglenophyta, Chrysophyta, Xanthophyta, Raphidophyta, Phaeophyta, Dinophyta, Cryptophyta, Glaucocystophyta, and Rhodophyta. Ruggell: Ganter Verlag, 2006. 713 p.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Studia biologica