CONNECTIONS OF ALIEN BIRD SPECIES WITH ALIEN PLANTS OF PARKS AND BOTANICAL GARDENS

T. V. Shupova


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1501.648

Abstract


Introduction. In urban conditions, alien species of biota have become an integral part of the cultural landscape. Today, an overall assessment of the influence of alien species on the functioning of ecosystems of their secondary range as is relevant. Such an assessment requires knowledge of the connections formed by alien species in the secondary habitat. The purpose of the study was to find the connections of alien bird species with alien plant species in the parks and botanical gardens of Kyiv.
Methods. Assessment was carried out in 10 forest parks, 3 botanical gardens, and 14 urban parks. In parks and botanical gardens, there is a wide range of plants alien to Kyiv Region, in contrast to forest parks. The number and distribution of birds were determined using the method of transect counts. The total area under study was about 370 hectares. Principal Component Analysis of the characteristics of habitats on which the number of alien birds may depend has been carried out. In the research, α-diversity indices of bird communities; number of people (individuals/km); number of pets (individuals/km); park’s area (ha); part of the territory; under the trees (%); part of alien species on plants communities (%) were analyzed.
Results. Parus major, Turdus merula, Erithacus rubecula, Fringilla сoelebs dominate in all communities. Columba palumbus, Ficedula albicollis, Turdus pilaris, Columba livia, Apus apus, Sturnus vulgaris, Passer domesticus sometimes dominate in bird communities in parks and botanical gardens. There are no alien species in forest parks. 4 alien species nest in parks and botanical gardens: Streptopelia decaocto, Dendrocopos syriacus, Phoenicurus ochruros, Serinus serinus (from the last century). Phylloscopus trochiloides was observed for the first time. Nesting of Ph. trochiloides was not confirmed. Alien birds are not evenly distributed (0–3 species). Nest density is low: S. decaocto 0.013±0.01–0.021±0.01, D. syriacus 0.031±0.01–0.043±0.04, Ph. ochruros 0–0.034±0.02, S. serinus 0.013±0.01–0.017±0.01. We assume that alien bird species is an element that replaces the species that were eliminated from the community. Their nesting in forest parks is an indicator of a disruption of the functioning of the forest ecosystem as a result of anthropogenic transformation of the forest. The presence of alien species of birds in modern parks and botanical gardens is normal. Their biotopes were created on the sites of destroyed landscapes and with using alien plant species.
Conclusion. In parks and botanical gardens, a specific structure of the plant community has developed due to the introduction of alien plant species, with a tree height of 3–5 m. As a consequence, alien birds find nesting stations in communities of nesting birds, which were not occupied by native species due to the absence of many species of tree canopy nesters and ground nesters birds. Alien species of birds also get access to vacant food resources. Alien birds use vacant resources. It was found that the area of parks has the most profound positive impact on the number of species of alien birds (+0.517), as well as the ratio of alien birds (+0.227). Other important correlations observed were the following: the number of species of alien birds in the bird communities – a part of alien species in plant communities (+0.084), the ratio of alien birds – part of alien species in plant communities (+0.041). The strongest negative connection is as follows: the number of species of alien birds in the bird communities – the number of pets (-0.213), the ratio of alien birds – the number of pets (-0.384).


Keywords


alien species, “alien birds–alien plants” сonnections, nesting stations, feeding stations

References


1. Amrhein V. Wild bird feeding (probably) affects avian urban ecology. In: Gil D., Brumm H. (Ed.) Avian Urban Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013: 29-38.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

2. Ayup M.M., Montti L., Aragón R., Grau H.R. Invasion of Ligustrum lucidum (Oleaceae) in the southern Yungas: Changes in habitat properties and decline in bird diversity. Acta Oecologica, 2014; 54: 72-81.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

3. Belik V.P. Serin and Black redstart in Sumy Polesie. Оrnithologia, 1977; 13: 187-188 (In Russian)
http://zmmu.msu.ru/ornithology/arch/ornitologija_1977_13.pdf

4. Bibby C., Burgess N., Hill D., Mustoe S. Bird census techniques. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press, 2000. 303 p.
Google Scholar

5. Blinkova O., Ivanenko О. Communities of woody vegetation and wood destroying fungi in natural and semi-natural forests of Kyiv city, Ukraine. Central European Forestry Journal, 2018; 64: 55-66.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

6. Blinkova O., Shupova T. Bird communities and vegetation composition in the urban forest ecosystem: correlations and comparisons of diversity indices. Ekológia (Bratislava), 2017; 36(4): 366-387.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

7. Blinkova O., Shupova T. Bird communities and vegetation composition in natural and semi-natural forests of megalopolis: correlations and comparisons of diversity indices (Kyiv city, Ukraine). Ekológia (Bratislava), 2018; 37(3): 259-288.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

8. Blinkova O.I., Shupova T.V., Raichuk L.A. Syn-Ecological Connections and Comparison of A-Diversity Indices of Plant and Bird Communities on Cultivated Coenosises. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 2020; 13(2): 62-78.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

9. Camprodon J., Brotons L. Effects of undergrowth clearing on the bird communities of the Northwestern Mediterranean Coppice Holm oak forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006; 221(1−3): 72−82.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

10. Chaplygina A.B., Pakhomov O.Y., Brygadyrenko V.V. Trophic links of the song thrush (Turdus philomelos) in transformed forest ecosystems of North-Eastern Ukraine. Biosystems Diversity, 2019; 27(1): 51-55.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

11. Chaplygina A.B. Pakhomov O.Y., Yevtushenko H.A., Brygadyrenko V.V. Trophic links of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) in transformed forest ecosystems of North-Eastern Ukraine. Biosystems Diversity, 2020; 28(1): 92-97.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

12. Chaplygina A.B., Shupova T.V., Nadtochiy A.S. The avifauna of the National Nature Park "Homilshanski Lisy". Biosystems Diversity, 2016; 24(1): 124-133. (In Russian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

13. Crocq C. Frugivory in overwintering Black Redstarts Phoenicurus ochruros in south-eastern France. Alauda, 2002; 70(3): 351−361.
Google Scholar

14. Ditchkoff S.S., Saalfeld S.T., Gibson C.J. Animal behavior in urban ecosystems: Modifications due to human-induced stress. Urban Ecosystem, 2006; 9(1); 5-12.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

15. Fesenko G.V. Birds of gardens and parks of Kyiv. Kryvyi Rih: Mineral, 2010. 236 p. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

16. Heyman E. Clearance of understory in urban woodlands: assessing impact on bird abundance and diversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010; 260(1): 125−131.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

17. Gaiduk V., Abramova I. Ecology of birds of the south-west of Belarus. Passerine. Brest: BrGU, 2013. 298 p. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

18. Gaychenko V.A., Shupova T.V. Diversity of bird communities of the forest in the Boyarska experimental station at the gradient of anthropic load. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 2020; 11(2): 74-82. (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

19. Guitian J., Fuentes M., Bermejo T., Guitian P., Larrinaga A.R., Amezquita P. Interactions between the Black Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros) and St. Lucie cherry (Prunus mahaleb) in rocky habitats. Revue d'Écologie (Terre & Vie), 2001; 56(1): 81−92.
Google Scholar

20. Gutiérrez J.L., Jones C.G., Sousa R. Toward an integrated ecosystem perspective of invasive species impacts. Acta Oecologica, 2014; 54: 131-138.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

21. Jang W., Eskelson B.N.I. T. Murray T., Crosby K.B., Wagner Sh., Gorby E., Aven N.W. Relationships between invasive plant species occurrence and socio-economic variables in urban green spaces of southwestern British Columbia, Canada. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2020; 47: 126527.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

22. Khuzhakhmetova A., Lazarev S., Semenyutina V. Ecological and biological assessment of climbing shrubs for landscaping residential areas. World Ecology Journal, 2020; 10(2): 88-109.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

23. Klausnitzer B. Ecology of urban fauna. Moscow: Mir, 1990. 248 p. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

24. Knysh N.P., Malyshok V.M. The European serin Serinus serinus in the north-east of Ukraine (Sumy Oblast): distribution and features of biology. Russian Ornithological Journal, 2015; 24(1156): 2147-2160. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

25. Koniakin S., Shupova T., Gubar L., Bilushenko A. Vertebrates of local landscape Feofaniya. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Series: Biology, 2019; 78(2): 19-27. (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

26. Magurran E. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Moscow: Mir, 1992. 161 p. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

27. Marisova I.V. About the Syrian woodpecker (Dendrocopos syriacus Hemp. et Ehrenb.) in Ukraine. Zoologicheskiy zhurnal, 1965; 44(11): 1735-1737. (In Russian)

28. McLaughlan C., Gallardo B., Aldridge D.C. How complete is our knowledge of the ecosystem services impacts of Europe's top 10 invasive species? Acta Oecologica, 2014; 54: 119-130.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

29. Mityai I.S., Koshelev A.I. Functional role of woodpeckers (Piciiformers) in natural and artificial forests of Middle Dneiper and North Azov region. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 2012; 1(4): 126-142. (In Russian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

30. Mityai I.S. Syrian woodpecker (Dendrocopos syriacus) in the Dnieper forest-steppe. Russian Ornithological Journal, 2005; 14(292): 596-597. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

31. Mohring, B., Brischoux, F., Angelier, F. Vineyards, but not cities, are associated with lower presence of a generalist bird, the Common Blackbird (Turdus merula), in Western France. Avian Research, 2021; 12: 3.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

32. Moffatt S.F., McLachlan S.M., Kenkel N.C. Impacts of land use on riparian forest along an urban - rural gradient in southern Manitoba. Plant Ecology, 2004; 174: 119-135.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

33. Møller A. Nest site selection across field-woodland ecotones: the effect of nest predation. Oikos, 1989; 56(2): 240-246.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

34. Netsvetov M., Prokopuk Y., Puchałka R., Koprowski M., Klisz M., Romenskyy M. River regulation causes rapid changes in relationships between floodplain oak growth and environmental variables. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019; 10: 96.
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

35. Nadtochiy A.S., Ziomenko S.K. To the ecology of the ringed Turtle dove in Kharkov. In: Voinstvensky M.A., Mamontova V.A. (Ed.) Ecology of nesting, changes in numbers birds under the influence of recreation. Kyiv: AS UkrSSR, 1987: 5-7. (In Russian)

36. Nadtochiy A.S. The first registration of Serin in Kharkov region. Branta, 2002; 5: 156. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

37. Nieolai B. Zu Vorkommen und Ernährung des Hausrotschwanzes Phoenicurus ochruros auf Mallorca im Winter. Journal für Ornithologie, 1998; 139: 67-70.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

38. Oleinik D.S. About the wintering of the Black redstart in the south of Ukraine. Berkut, 2005; 14(1): 142-143. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

39. Olney P. Berries and birds. Birds, 1966; 1(5): 98-99.
Google Scholar

40. Paker Y., Yom-Tov Y., Alon-Mozes T., Barnea A. The effect of plant richness and urban garden structure on bird species richness, diversity and community structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014; 122: 186-195.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

41. Panasenko N.N., Anishchenko L.N. Influence of invasive plants Parthenocissus vitacea and Vinca minor on biodiversity indices of forest communities. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2018; 11: 614-623.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

42. Pesotskaya V.V. To ornitofauna of the maniforated forestry of the Kharkov region. Ecology and Noospherology, 2019; 30(1): 56-61. (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

43. Pesotskaya V.V. Chaplygina A.B., Shupova T.V., Kratenko R.I. Fruit and berry plants of forest belts as a factor of species diversity of ornithofauna during the breeding season and autumn migration period. Biosystems Diversity, 2020; 28(3): 290-297.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

44. Prokopuk Yu., Krylov Ya. Condition, protection and maintenance of age-old pedunculate oak trees in Feofania forest. Ecology and Noospherology, 2018; 29(1): 36-41. (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

45. Shupova Т.V. Avifauna in settlement zone of Kiev. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Biology", 2014; 21: 83-91. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

46. Shupova Т.V. Adaptations of Black Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros S.G. Gmelin) to inhabit in Kyiv city metropolis. Studia Biologica, 2014; 8(1): 187-196. (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

47. Shupova Т.V. Black Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros) in Krivoi Rog city. Optimization and Protection of Ecosystems, 2014; 10: 116-121. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

48. Shupova Т.V. Adaptation of the birds the order Columbiformes to the transformation of habitat. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Series: Biology, 2015; 1(69): 46-51. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

49. Shupova T.V. Transformation in the diversity of avifauna under the influence of recreational load. Biosystems Diversity, 2017; 25(1): 45-51. (In Russian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

50. Shupova T.V., Koniakin S.N. Formation of nesting bird communities in parks on the gradient of anthropic load in Kiev metropolis. Branta, 2020; 23: 41-59. (In Russian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

51. Skilsky I.V. About synanthropization degree of the ornithofauna: approaches, methods, results (on example of Chernivtsi city). Berkut, 2001; 10(2): 140-152. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

52. Soltani G.A., Shilnikov D.S. Transformation of historical landscapes as a result of biological invasions. Plant Biology and Horticulture: theory, innovation. 2020; 156: 37-43 (In Russian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

53. Yang X.J., Sun Z.Y., Han L., Ju G.S., Peng Z.H. Study on semi-lethal low temperatures and physiological index for cold resistance of four Parthenocissus species. Forest Research, Beijing, 2010; 23(1): 147-150.
Google Scholar

54. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Fomin_Botanical_Garden

55. http://www.nbg.kiev.ua/collections_expositions

56. http://izan.kiev.ua/term_com/aves.htm


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 T. V. Shupova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.