МЕТОДИ ОЦІНКИ ПОСУХОСТІЙКОСТІ СЕЛЕКЦІЙНОГО МАТЕРІАЛУ ПШЕНИЦІ
Анотація
Ключові слова
Повний текст:
PDFПосилання
Abdullaev A. A., Dzhumaev B. B., erhashev A. y dr. Vlyianye zasukhy na fotosyntetycheskye parametry flahovykh lystev razlychnykh sortov pshenytsy // Yzv. AN Respublyky Tadzhykystan. Otd. byol. y med. nauk. 2010. № 4 (173). S. 46-53.
Andriushchenko V. K., Saianova V. V., Zhuchenko A. A. y dr. Modyfykatsyia metoda opredelenyia prolyna dlia vyiavlenyia zasukhoustoichyvykh form roda Lycopersicon Tourn // Yzv. AN Mold. SSR. Ser. byol. y khym. nauk. 1981. T. 4. S. 55-60.
Borysova O., Ruzhytska O. Fizioloho-biokhimichni pokaznyky prorostkiv pshenyts Triticum aestivum L. ta Triticum spelta L. za modeliuvannia vodnoho defitsytu // Visn. Kharkiv. un-tu. Ser. biol. 2014. T. 23. № 1129. S. 81-88.
Bulavka N. V., Yurchenko T. V., Kucherenko O. M., Pirych A. V. Sorty pshenytsi miakoi ozymoi, stiiki do vplyvu nehatyvnykh chynnykiv dovkillia // Sortovyvchennia ta okhorona prav na sorty roslyn. 2018. T. 14. № 3. S. 255-261.
Bychkova O. V., Khlebova L. P. Fyzyolohycheskaia otsenka zasukhoustoichyvosty yarovoi tverdoi pshenytsy // Acta Biologica Sibirica. 2015. T. 1. № 1-2. S. 107-116. https://doi.org/10.14258/abs.v1i1-2.853
Varavkyn V. A., Taran N. Yu. Dyahnostyka zasukhoustoichyvosty sortov pshenytsy raznoi selektsyy po osmorehuliatornym svoistvam semian // ScienceRise. 2014. T. 3. № 1(3). S. 18-22.
Vasylkivskyi S. P., Hudzenko V. M., Kochmarskyi V. S., Kyrylenko V. V. Realizatsiia potentsialu sortiv zernovykh kultur - shliakh vyrishennia prodovolchoi problemy // Faktory eksperymentalnoi evoliutsii orhanizmiv. 2017. T. 21. S. 47-51. https://doi.org/10.7124/FEEO.v21.805
Vus N. O., Kobyzieva L. N., Bezuhla O. M. Selektsiina tsinnist zrazkiv nutu za posukhostiikistiu v umovakh skhidnoho Lisostepu Ukrainy // Nauk. dop. NUBiP Ukrainy. 2017. № 4 (68). http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Dopovidi/article/view/9108
Halaiev O. V., Babaiants L. T. Molekuliarno-henetychni markery dlia identyfikatsii heniv stiikosti do hrybkovykh zakhvoriuvan pshenytsi miakoi (Triticum aestivum L.) // Zb. nauk. prats SHI-NTsNS. 2015. № 25. S. 61-75.
Henerozova Y. P., Maevskaia S. N., Shuhaev A. H. Ynhybyrovanye metabolycheskoi aktyvnosty mytokhondryi etyolyrovannykh prorostkov horokha, podverhnutykh vodnomu stressu // Fyzyolohyia rastenyi. 2009. T. 56. № 1. S. 45-52.
Henkel P. A., Badanova K. A., Levyna V. V. O novom laboratornom sposobe dyahnostyky zharo- y zasukhoustoichyvosty dlia selektsyy // Fyzyolohyia rastenyi. 1970. T. 17. № 2. S. 431-437. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1970.17.3.03a00110
Hryhoriuk Y. A., Tkachev V. Y., Savynskaia S. V., Musyenko N. N. Sovremennye metody yssledovanyia y otsenky zasukho- y zharostoikosty rastenyi. K.: Naukovyi svit, 2003. 139 s.
Demydov O. A., Khomenko S. O., Fedorenko I. V., Fedorenko M. V. Otsinka posukhostiikosti linii pshenytsi yaroi i umovakh Lisostepu Ukrainy // Selektsiia i nasinnytstvo. 2016. Vyp. 110. S. 53-60.
Derzhavnyi reiestr sortiv roslyn, prydatnykh dlia poshyrennia v Ukraini na 2019 rik; Ministerstvo ahrarnoi polityky ta prodovolstva Ukrainy. K., 2019. 497 s. https://sops.gov.ua/reestr-sortiv-roslin
Dorofeev V. F., Rudenko M. Y., Udachyn R. A. Zasukhoustoichyvye pshenytsy: metodych. ukazanyia / pod red. V.F. Dorofeeva. L.: VYR, 1974. 186 s.
Dubrovna O. V., Bavol A. V., Zinchenko M. O. ta in. Vplyv osmotychnykh rechovyn na kaliusni linii miakoi pshenytsi, stiiki do kulturalnoho filtratu Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici // Visn. Ukr. tov-va henetykiv i selektsioneriv. 2011. T. 9. № 1. S. 10-16.
Dubrovna O. V., Morhun B. V. Bavol A. V. Biotekhnolohii pshenytsi: klitynna selektsiia ta henetychna inzheneriia. K.: Lohos, 2014. 375 s.
Zhemela H. P., Kuznetsova O. A. Vplyv sortovykh vlastyvostei na produktyvnist ta yakist zerna pshenytsi miakoi ozymoi // Visn. Poltav. derzh. ahrarnoi akademii. 2012. № 3. S. 23-25.
Zykyn V. A., Rosseeva L. P., Belan Y. A., Kadykov R. K. Metodyka otsenky selektsyonnykh form y sortov miahkoi pshenytsy pry yspytanyy na otlychymost, odnorodnost y ustoichyvost k faktoram sredy: metod. rekomendatsyy. SO RASKhN, SybNYYSKh, FHOU VPO BHAU. Ufa, 2004. 39 s.
Kobyletska M., Rybak O., Telehii M. Aktyvovani salitsylatom zminy intensyvnosti peroksydatsii lipidiv u roslynakh pshenytsi ta kukurudzy za umov posukhy // Biol. studii. 2017. T. 11. № 3-4. S. 62-63.
Kozhushko N. N. Vykhod elektrolytov kak kryteryi otsenky zasukhoustoichyvosty y osobennosty eho yspolzovanyia dlia zernovykh kultur. Metody otsenky ustoichyvosty rastenyi k neblahopryiatnym uslovyiam sredy / pod red. H.V. Udovenko. L.: Kolos, 1976. S. 32-42.
Kolupaev Yu. E., Vainer A. A., Yastreb T. O. Prolyn: fyzyolohycheskye funktsyy y rehuliatsyia soderzhanyia v rastenyiakh v stressovykh uslovyiakh // Visn. Khark. nats. ahr. un-tu. Ser. biol. 2014. T. 2. № 32. S. 6-22.
Korkhova M. M., Ulich L. I. Vyvchennia posukhostiikosti sortiv ozymoi pshenytsi porivnialnym ekspres-metodom // Ahrobiolohiia. 2010. Vyp. 2 (69). S. 113-115.
Kumakov V. A., Evdokymova O. A., Buianova M. A. Sposoby ranzhyrovanyia henotypov yarovoi pshenytsy po ykh potentsyalnoi produktyvnosty y ustoichyvosty k neblahopryiatnym faktoram sredy po nakoplenyiu y raspredelenyiu sukhoi massy rastenyi v peryod vehetatsyy // Selskokhoz. byolohyia. 2000. № 1. S. 108-112.
Kunakh V. A. Mobilni henetychni elementy i plastychnist henomu roslyn. K.: Lohos, 2013. 300 s.
Liashok A. K., Musych V. N. Sposoby otbora ustoichyvykh ozymykh y yarovykh rastenyi yz yarovo-ozymykh hybrydov v fytotrone. Systemy yntensyvnoho kultyvyrovanyia rastenyi: sb. nauch. tr. L., 1987. S. 125-129.
Malenka U., Kobyletska M., Terek O. Vplyv salitsylovoi kysloty na vmist vilnykh aminokyslot i prolinu v roslyn pshenytsi ta kukurudzy za umov posukhy // Biol. studii. 2014. T. 8. № 2. S. 123-132. https://doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0802.332
Mamenko T. P., Yaroshenko O. A. Zminy aktyvnosti antyoksydantnykh fermentiv u lystkakh ozymoi pshenytsi, indukovani salitsylovoiu kyslotoiu v umovakh posukhy // Fyzyolohyia y byokhymyia kult. rastenyi. 2010. T. 42. № 6. S. 513-521.
Metodyka derzhavnoho sortovyprobuvannia silskohospodarskykh kultur / za red. V. V. Volkodava. 2000. K.: Alefa, C. 10-50.
Morhun V. V., Dubrovna O. V., Morhun B. V. Suchasni biotekhnolohii otrymannia stiikykh do stresiv roslyn pshenytsi // Fyzyolohyia rastenyi y henetyka. 2016. T. 48. № 3. S. 196-214.
Morhun V. V., Stasyk O. O., Kirizii D. A., Priadkina H. O. Zviazok reaktsii fotosyntetychnykh pokaznykiv i zernovoi produktyvnosti na gruntovu posukhu v kontrastnykh za stiikistiu sortiv ozymoi pshenytsi // Fyzyolohyia rastenyi y henetyka. 2016. T. 48. № 5. S. 371-381.
Nykytyn V. A. Bystryi sposob opredelenyia elektroprovodnosty rastytelnoi tkany // Fyzyolohyia rastenyi. 1964. T. 13. № 2. S. 373-376.
Oleinykova T. V., Osypov Yu. F. Opredelenye zasukhoustoichyvosty sortov pshenytsy y yachmenia, lynyi y hybrydov kukuruzy po prorastanyiu semian na rastvorakh sakharozy s vysokym osmotycheskym davlenyem. Metody otsenky ustoichyvosty rastenyi k neblahopryiatnym uslovyiam sredy / pod red. H. V. Udovenko. L.: Kolos, 1976. S. 23-32.
Pat. 132899 Ukraina, MPK A01H 1/04. Sposib otsinky henotypiv pshenytsi miakoi ozymoi do dii vodnoho defitsytu / Yurchenko T.V., Demydov O.A., Pykalo S.V., Prokopik N.I., Fomaniuk V.A.; Myronivskyi instytut pshenytsi imeni V.M. Remesla NAAN. No 201811089; Zaiavl. 09.11.2018; Opubl. 11.03.2019, Biul. № 5. 4 s.
Pat. 25624 Ukraina: MPK A01C 1/00. Sposib otsinky stiikosti sortiv zernovykh kolosovykh kultur do stresovykh umov vyroshchuvannia / Dindoroho V. H., Klymenko I. I., Lutsenko L. A., Valyvakhin H. M., Kontar O. A.; Instytut roslynnytstva imeni V.Ia. Yurieva UAAN. No 200704566; Zaiavl. 24.04.2007; Opubl. 10.08.2007, Biul. № 12. 5 s.
Pat. 42371 A Ukraina: MPK A01C 1/00, A01G 7/00. Sposib otsinky posukhostiikosti ozymoi pshenytsi / Zhuk O. I., Hryhoriuk I. P.; Instytut fiziolohii roslyn i henetyky NAN Ukrainy. No 2001010698; Zaiavl. 30.01.2001; Opubl. 15.10.2001, Biul. № 9.
Pykalo S. V., Zinchenko M. O., Voloshchuk S. I., Dubrovna O. V. Selektsiia in vitro trytykale ozymoho na stiikist do vodnoho defitsytu // Biotechnologia Acta. 2015. T. 8. № 2. S. 69-77. https://doi.org/10.15407/biotech8.02.069
Pykalo S. V., Demydov O. A., Prokopik N. I. ta in. Skryninh in vitro hibrydiv F2 pshenytsi yaroi na stiikist do vodnoho defitsytu // ScienceRise: Biological Science. 2018. № 3(12). S. 12-18. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-8025.2018.133030
Posylaeva O. A., Kyrychenko V. V. Yskhodnyi materyal soy dlia selektsyy na zharo- y zasukhoustoichyvost // Vestn. Belorus. hos. selskokhoz. akademyy. 2014. № 3. S. 94-98.
Prokopik N. I., Chuhunkova T. V., Khomenko S. O. Otsinka posukhostiikosti sortiv pshenytsi miakoi ozymoi riznoho ekoloho-heohrafichnoho pokhodzhennia za umov osmotychnoho stresu // Nauk. dop. NUBiP Ukrainy. 2019. № 3 (79).
URL: http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Dopovidi/article/view/12692
Prianyshnykov D. N. Vehetatsyonnyi metod y eho rol v ahrokhymycheskom yssledovanyy. M.: Yzd-vo AN SSSR, 1963. S. 5-16.
Reshetnykov V. N., Spyrydovych E. V., Nosov A. M. Byotekhnolohyia rastenyi y perspektyvy ee razvytyia // Fyzyolohyia rastenyi y henetyka. 2014. T. 46. № 1. S. 3-18.
Rosseev V. M., Belan Y. A., Rosseeva L. P. Testyrovanye in vitro yarovoi miahkoi pshenytsy na zasukhoustoichyvost // Vest. Alt. hos. ahr. un-ta. 2011. T. 76. № 2. S. 32-34.
Rossykhina H. S., Popov V. Ia. Systematyzatsiia ta vdoskonalennia metodolohichnoho zabezpechennia doslidzhennia posukhostiikosti roslyn // Visn. Dnipropetr. un-tu. Biolohiia, ekolohiia. 2009. Vyp. 17. T. 1. S. 199-204. https://doi.org/10.15421/010930
Tahymanova D. S., Erhalyeva A. Zh., Raizer O. B., Khapylyna O. N. Otsenka henotypov yarovoi miahkoi pshenytsy na zasukhoustoichyvost v uslovyiakh in vitro // Byotekhnolohyia. Teoryia y praktyka. 2013. № 2. S. 42-46.
Tumanov Y. Y. Nedostatochnoe vozobnovlenye y zaviadanye rastenyia kak sredstva povyshenyia eho zasukhoustoichyvosty // Trudy po prykladnoi botanyke, henetyke y selektsyy. 1926. T. 16. № 4. S. 293-388.
Ulich L. I., Bochkarova L. P., Lysikova V. M., Semenikhin O. V. Posukhostiikist sortiv pshenytsi ozymoi (Triticum aestivum L.), prydatnykh do poshyrennia v Ukraini // Sortovyvchennia ta okhorona prav na sorty roslyn. 2008. № 1. S. 106-113.
Cherenkov A. V., Hasanova I. I., Solodushko M. M. Pshenytsia ozyma - rozvytok ta selektsiia kultury v istorychnomu aspekti // Biul. In-tu silskohosp. step. zony. 2014. № 6. S. 3-6.
Shelepov V. V., Malasai V. M., Penzev A. F. y dr. Morfolohyia, byolohyia, khoziaistvennaia tsennost pshenytsy. K.: Yzd-vo Myronovsk. yn-ta pshenytsy, 2004. 524 s.
Abd El-Hadi A. A. Molecular characterization of some durum wheat drought tolerant mutants by RAPD and ISSR analysis // Arab J. Biotech. 2012. Vol. 15. N 1. Р. 77-90.
Ahmed A. Response of immature embryos in vitro regeneration of some wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under different osmotic stress of mannitol // J. Agric. Sci. 1999. Vol. 30. N 3. P. 25-34.
Bartels D., Sunkar R. Drought and salt tolerance in plants // Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2005. Vol. 24. N 1. P. 23-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680590910410
Bavol A. V., Zinchenko M. O., Dubrovna O. V. Molecular polymorphism of wheat cell lines resistant to metabolites produced by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici under the effect of osmotic stress // Cytol. Genet. 2014. Vol. 48. N 1. P. 49-54. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452714010022
Beltrano J., Marta G. R. Improved tolerance of wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.) to drought stress and rewatering by the arbuscularmycorrhizal fungus Glomusclaroideum: Effect on growth and cell membrane stability // Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2008. Vol. 20. N 1. Р. 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202008000100004
Blum A. Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential - are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? // Austr. J. Agricult. Res. 2005. Vol. 56. N 11. P. 1159-1168. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05069
Breiman A., Graur D. Wheat evaluation // Isr. J. Plant Sci. 1995. Vol. 43. N 2. P. 58-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/07929978.1995.10676595
Butt A., Ahmed N., Mubin M. et al. Effect of PEG and mannitol induced water stress on regeneration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) // Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 2015. Vol. 52. N 4. Р. 1025-1033.
Catsky J. Water saturation deficit (relative water content). Methods of Studying Plant Water Relations / Ed. N. Slavik. Springer-Verlag, 1974. Р. 136-156.
Chaichi M., Sanjarian F., Razavi K., Gonzalez-Hernandez J. L. Analysis of transcriptional responses in root tissue of bread wheat landrace (Triticum aestivum L.) reveals drought avoidance mechanisms under water scarcity // PloS one. 2019. Vol. 14. N 3. e0212671. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212671 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212671
Chaichi M., Sanjarian F., Razavi K., Gonzalez-Hernandez J. L. Phenotypic diversity among Iranian bread wheat landraces, as a screening tool for drought tolerance // Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2019. Vol. 41. N 6. P. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2882-1
Chandra D., Islam M. A. Genetic variation and heritability of excised-leaf water loss and its relationship with yield and yield components of F5 bulks in five wheat crosses // J. Biol. Sci. 2003. Vol. 3. N 11. P. 1032-1039. https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2003.1032.1039
Chеrnobaі L. N., Ponurenko S. G., Sikalova O. V. Evaluation of stability for maize genotype characteristics by drought tolerance indices under different hydrothermal conditions // Wschodnioeuropejskie Czasopismo Naukowe (East European Scientific Journal). 2016. Vol. 8. N 6. P. 69-75.
De Leonardis A. M., Marone S., Mazzucotelli E. et al. Durum wheat genes upregulated in the early phases of cold stress are modulated by drought in a developmental and genotype dependent manner // Plant Sci. 2007. Vol. 172. N 5. P. 1005-1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.02.002
Dehghani I., Mostajeran A., Esmaeili A., Ghannadian M. The role of DREB2 gene in drought tolerance of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) associated with Azospirillum Brasilense // Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2019. Vol. 17. N 2. P. 4883-4902. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1702_48834902
Dodig D., Zorić M., Mitić N. et al. Tissue culture and agronomic traits relationship in wheat // Plant Cell, Tiss .Org. Cult. 2008. Vol. 95. N 1. P. 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-008-9421-x
Dragiiska R., Djilianov D., Denchev P., Atanassov A. In vitro selection for osmotic tolerance in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) // Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 1996. Vol. 22. N 3-4. P. 30-39.
Dubrovna O. V., Bavol A. V. Variability of the wheat genome during in vitro culture // Cytol. Genet. 2011. Vol. 45. N 5. P. 333-340. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452711050033
Eid M. Validation of SSR molecular markers linked to drought tolerant in some wheat cultivars // J. Plant Breed. Genet. 2018. Vol. 6. N 3. С. 95-109. https://doi.org/10.33687/pbg.006.03.2739
Fàbregas N., Fernie A. R. The metabolic response to drought // J. Exp. Bot. 2019. Vol. 70. N 4. P. 1077-1085. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery437
FAO. Crop Prospects and Food Situation ‑ Quarterly Global Report. № 4. December 2019. Rome. 46 p. http://www.fao.org/3/ca7236en/ca7236en.pdf
Farshadfar E., Jamshidi B., Cheghamirza K., da Silva J. A. T. Evaluation of drought tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using in vivo and in vitro techniques // Ann. Biol. Res. 2012. Vol. 3. N 1. P. 465-476.
Fernandez George C. J. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress. Aug. 13-16, Shanhua, Taiwan, 1992. Р. 257-270.
Fisher R. A., Maurer R. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. 1. Grain yield responses // Aust. J. Agr. Res. 1978. Vol. 29. N 5. Р. 897-912. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
Gavuzzi P., Rizza F., Palumbo M. et al. Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals // Can. J. Plant Sci. 1997. Vol. 77. N 4. Р. 523-531. https://doi.org/10.4141/P96-130
Gawande N. D., Mahurkar D. G., Rathod T. H. et al. In vitro screening of wheat genotypes for drought tolerance // Ann. Plant Physiol. 2005. Vol. 19. N 2. P. 162-168.
Geravandi M., Farshadfar E., Kahrizi D. Evaluation of some physiological traits as indicators of drought tolerance in bread wheat genotypes // Rus. J. Plant Physiol. 2011. Vol. 58. N 1. Р. 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443711010067
Grandbastien M.-A. Activation of plant retrotransposons under stress conditions // Trends Plant Sci. 1998. Vol. 3. N 5. Р. 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01232-1
Grzesiak M. T., Hordyńska N., Maksymowicz A. et al. Variation among spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes in response to the drought stress. II - Root system structure // Plants. 2019. Vol. 8. N 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants8120584
Haley S. D. Quick J. S., Morgan J. A. Excised-leaf water status evaluation and associations in field-grown winter wheat // Can. J. Plant Sci. 1993. Vol. 73. N 1. P. 55-63. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps93-008
Koszegi B., Farshadfar E., Vagujfalvi A., Sutka J. Drought tolerance studies on wheat/Rye disomic chromosome addition lines // Acta Agron. Hung. 1996. Vol. 44. P. 121-126.
Makar O. O., Patsula O. I., Kavulych Y. Z. et al. Excized leaf water status as a measure of drought resistance of Ukrainian spring wheat // Studia Biologica. 2019. Vol. 13. N 2. P. 41-54. https://doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1302.604
McClintock B. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge // Science. 1984. Vol. 226. N 4676. P. 792-801. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.15739260
Mehraban A., Tobe A., Gholipouri A. et al. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices and yield stability of wheat cultivars to drought stress in different growth stage // World J. Environ. Biosci. 2018. Vol. 7. N 1. P. 8-14.
Mwadzingeni L., Shimelis H., Dube E. et al. Breeding wheat for drought tolerance: Progress and technologies // J. Integr. Agr. 2016. Vol. 15. N 5. Р. 935-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61102-9
Plaut Z. Plant exposure to water stress during specific growth stages // Encyclopedia of Water Science. 2003. P. 673-675.
Rane J. M., Maheshwari S. N. Effect of pre-anthesis water stress on growth, photosynthesis and yield of six wheat cultivars differing in drought tolerance // Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 2001. Vol. 6. N 1. Р. 53-60.
Raveena, Bharti R., Chaudhary N. Drought resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a review // Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2019. Vol. 8. N 9. Р. 1780-1792. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.809.206
Ribaut J.-M., Poland D. Molecular approaches for the genetic improvement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments. A Strategic Planning Workshop held at CIMMYT. 1999. 180 p.
Sallam A., Alqudah A. M., Dawood M. F. et al. Drought stress tolerance in wheat and barley: advances in physiology, breeding and genetics research // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019. Vol. 20. N 13. 3137. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20133137
Sattar S., Afzal R., Bashir I. et al. Biochemical, molecular and morpho-physiological attributes of wheat to upgrade grain production and compete with water stress // Int. J. Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research. 2019. Vol. 3. N 3. Р. 510-528. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2019.206.16
Sivamani E., Bahieldin A., Wraith J.M. et al. Improved biomass productivity and water use efficiency under water deficit conditions in transgenic wheat constitutively expressing the barley HVA1 gene // Plant Sci. 2000. Vol. 155. N 1. Р. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00247-2
Sönmezoğlu Ö. A., Terzi B. Characterization of some bread wheat genotypes using molecular markers for drought tolerance // Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants. 2018. Vol. 24. N 1. Р. 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-017-0492-1
Ştefîrţă A., Brânză L., Leahu I. et al. Identificarea implicării statusului apei în formarea stres-memoriei la plantele expuse repetat la stresul cauzat de secetă // Buletinul AŞM. Ştiinţele vieţii. 2017. N 1 (331). P. 48-58.
Talebi R., Fayaz F., Naji A. M. Effective selection criteria for assessing drought stress tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) // Gen. Appl. Plant Physiol. 2009. Vol. 35. N ½. Р. 64-74.
Yadav A. K., Carroll A. J., Estavillo G. M. et al. Wheat drought tolerance in the field is predicted by amino acid responses to glasshouse-imposed drought // J. Exp. Bot. 2019. Vol. 70. N 18. P. 4931-4948. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz224
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/vlubs.2020.82.05
Посилання
- Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.
