Biol. Stud. 2018: 12(3–4); 75–94 • DOI:


Z. Barkaszi, I. Zagorodniuk


We analysed the composition of the steppe assemblage in the mammal fauna of Transcarpathia (Ukraine), which is represented by three rodent species such as the European ground squirrel Spermophilus citellus, the common hamster Cricetus cricetus, and the steppe mouse Mus spicilegus. These species have not been considered in the composition of the local fauna or they were mentioned only in general checklists, or even with obvious mistakes in descriptions of both key characters and record localities. Here we present detailed descriptions of distribution of each steppe species based on actual record localities as well as ecological and biogeographic features. In total, we have generalized data on 13 record localities of Spermophilus citellus, 7 of Cricetus cricetus, and 8 of Mus spicilegus. We also revealed and described general trends in the distribution of these species: all of them occur in the lowland part of Transcarpathia between the valleys of the Tisza and Latorica rivers and adjacent areas. Generally, steppe species in Transcarpathia are related to anthropogenically transformed biotopes: the European ground squirrel mainly occurs along banks of dammed rivers in zones of floods, while the common hamster and the steppe mouse are both related to agricultural lands. The absence of natural populations in indigenous biotopes and, in fact, the absence of typical key steppe habitats suggest that steppe species appeared in Trans­carpathia as the result of expansion from their main geographic range as suitable habitats gradually appeared at the range periphery. The closest centre of distribution of each species is located beyond the studied region, namely in the Great Hungarian Plain, and the records described here are marginal: they are instable and attributed to the zones of range pulsation, which depends on climatic factors and current landscape features of the lowland part of Transcarpathia. The state and dynamics of range-edge populations of steppe species in Transcarpathia might be largely affected by the hydrological regi­me, wintering conditions, human activity, etc., as well as by “edge effects” that usually take place in fragmented populations. The influence of such processes probably could explain the low abundance and rarity of steppe species in the region, and, in the same time, makes topical the issue of their conservation. At present, conservation issues especially concern two species, namely the European ground squirrel and the common hamster, which are keystone species in steppe and forest steppe ecosystems.

Keywords: steppe fauna, rodents, rare species, biotopes, Transcarpathia, Ukraine


Full Text:



1. Abelentsev V.I. Mustelids. Fauna of Ukraine. Volume 1. Mammals. Issue 3. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1968. 280 p. (In Ukrainian)

2. Barkaszi Z., Zagorodniuk I. The taxonomy of rodents of the Eastern Carpathians. Proceedings of the State Natural History Museum, 2016; 32: 137-154.

3. Bashta A.-T, Potish L. Mammals of the Transcarpathian region (Ukraine). Lviv, 2007. 260 p. (In Ukrainian)

4. Benedek A.M. Small mammals (Insectivora and Rodentia) from the Agnita-Sighişoara area (Transylvania, Romania). Transylvanian Review of Systematical and Ecological Research, 2007; 4: 187-198.

5. Bihari Z. A güzüegér magyarországi elterjedése és építő tevékenységének jellemzői. Vadbiolуgia, 2003; 10: 107-114.

6. Bonhomme F., Catalan J., Gerasimov S., Orsini P., Thaler L. Le complexe d'espèces du genre Mus en Europe Centrale et Orientale. I. Génétique. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 1983; 48: 78-85.

7. Botlik J. Gát. Budapest: Száz magyar falu könyvesháza Kht, 2001. 233 p.

8. Čanády A., Mošanský L., Stanko M., Fricová J. Fauna drobných zemných cicavcov (Insectivora, Rodentia) Priemyselného parku Kechnec (Košická kotlina, Východný Slovensko). Natura Carpathica, 2007; 48: 153-162.

9. Čanády A., Mošanský L., Uličná L. Variability of skull and dental characteristics in Mus spicilegus from the northern border of its distributional range. Biologia, 2014; 69(10): 1425-1430.

10. Cserkész T. Az ürge (Spermophilus citellus) gyakoriságának változása Magyarországon 1950 és 2017 között. LIFE13NAT/HU/000183 számú "A kerecsensólyom és a parlagi sas táplálékbázisának megőrzése a Kárpát-medencében" LIFE+NATURE projekt A1 akciуja. 2018. 25 p.

11. Donovan T.M., Jones P.W., Annand E.M., Thompson III F.T. Variation in local-scale edge effects: mechanism and landscape context. Ecology, 1997; 78(7): 2064-2075.[2064:VILSEE]2.0.CO;2

12. Éhik Gy. A mezei görény (Mustela eversmanni Less.) hazánkban. Annales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, 1928; 25: 1-38.

13. Filipenko S. Records of the steppe polecat (Mustela eversmanni Lesson, 1827) in Ukraine: review of zoological collections. Proceedings of the Theriological School, 2014; 12: 102-107. (In Ukrainian).

14. Grulich I. Populationsdichte des Hamsters (Cricetus cricetus, Mamm.). Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Brno, 1980; 14(6): 1-44.

15. Hanski I., Ovaskainen O. Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes. Theoretical Population Ecology, 2003; 64(1): 119-127.

16. Harris L. D. Edge effects and conservation of biotic diversity. Conservation Biology, 1988; 2(4): 330-332.

17. Heptner V.G. On some features of distribution of mammals in the European part of the Soviet Union. In: Kratochvíl, J., Obrtel, R. (Eds) Symposium Theriologicum II (Brno). Praha: Academia, 1974. P. 93-97. (In Russian)

18. Janák M., Marhoul P., Matějů J. Action plan for the conservation of the European ground squirrel Spermophilus citellus in the European Union. European Commission, 2013. 61 p.

19. Kondratenko A. V. The mound-building mouse, Mus spicilegus (Mammalia, Rodentia) in eastern regions of Ukraine. Proceedings of the Theriological School, 2006; 7: 63-66. (In Russian)

20. Konkoly-Gyuró É., Balázs P. Erdőborítás-változás a Kárpát-medence térségében a 19. század közepétől napjainkig. Erdészettudományi Közlemények, 2016; 6(1): 79-97.

21. Korchinsky A. Rodents of the Ukrainian Carpathians (research results). In: Issues of protection and rational use of plants and animals of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Uzhgorod: MOIP, 1988. P. 156-173. (In Russian)

22. Korobchenko M., Zagorodniuk I. Taxonomy and levels of differentiation in mole-rats (Spalacidae) of the fauna of Ukraine and adjacent countries. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod University, Series Biology, 2009; 26: 13-26. (In Ukrainian)

23. Krištofík J., Danko Š. Distribution of Mus spicilegus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Slovakia. Lynx, Praha, n. s., 2003; 34: 55-60.

24. Kryštufek B. Spermophilus citellus (Linnaeus, 1766). In: Mitchell-Jones A.J., Amori G., Bogdanowicz W., Kryštufek B., Reijnders P.J.H., Spitzenberger F., Stubbe M., Thissen J.B.M., Vohralík V., Zima J. (Eds) The Atlas of European Mammals. London: Academic Press, 1999. P. 190-191.

25. Kuznetsov B.A. On some patterns of distribution of mammals in the European part of the Soviet Union. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 1936; 15(1): 96-127. (In Russian)

26. La Haye M.J.J., Neumann K., Koelewijn H.P. Strong decline of gene diversity in local populations of the highly endangered common hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in the western part of its European range. Conservation Genetics, 2012; 13(2): 311-322.

27. La Haye M.J.J., Swinnen K.R.R., Kuiters A.T., Leirs H., Siepel H. Modelling population dyna­mics of the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus): timing of harvest as a critical aspect in the conservation of a highly endangered rodent. Biological Conservation, 2014; 180: 53-61.

28. Lehoczky T. Bereg vármegye monographiája. I kötet. Ungvár, 1881. 472 p.

29. Macholán M. Mus spicilegus Petenyi, 1882 in Transcarpathian Ukraine? A revision of Štépánek (1934). Časopis Národního muzea. Řada přírodovědná, 1995; 164: 33-37.

30. Magyari E.K., Chapman J.C., Passmore D.G., Allen J.R.M., Huntley J.P., Huntley B. Holocene persistence of wooded steppe in the Great Hungarian Plain. Journal of Biogeography, 2010; 37: 915-935.

31. Mezhzherin S.V. The common hamster Cricetus cricetus (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Akimov I.A. (Ed.) Red Data Book of Ukraine. Animals. Kyiv: Globalkonsalting, 2009 a. P. 531. (In Ukrainian)

32. Mezhzherin S.V. The European ground squirrel, Spermophilus citellus Linnaeus, 1766. In: Akimov I.A. (Ed.) Red Data Book of Ukraine. Animals. Kyiv: Globalkonsalting, 2009 b. P. 517. (In Ukrainian)

33. Mezhzherin S.V., Zagorodnyuk I.V. Morphological, karyological and genetic divergences of the house (Mus musculus musculus) and mound-building mice (Mus musculus hortulanus). In: Sokolov V. E. (Ed.) House Mouse. Moscow, 1989; P. 99-114. (In Russian)

34. Mezhzherin S.V., Lashkova O.I. Mammals of Ukraine. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 2013. 356 p. (In Ukrainian)

35. Mojsisovich A. Az Osztrák-Magyar Monarchia állatvilága. In: Habsburg-Lothringen R. et al. (Eds) Az Osztrák-Magyar Monarchia írásban és képben. Budapest: Magyar Királyi Államnyomda, 1887. P. 253-338.

36. Munteanu C., Kuemmerle T., Boltiziar M., Butsic V., Gimmi U., Halada L., Kaim D. et al. Forest and agricultural land change in the Carpathian region - a meta-analysis of long-term pattern and drivers of change. Land Use Policy, 2014; 38: 685-697.

37. Nechay G., Hamar M., Grulich I. The common hamster (Cricetus cricetus [L.]): a review. EPPO Bulletin, 1977; 7(2): 255-276.

38. Neumann K., Jansman H., Kayser A., Maak S., Gattermann R. Multiple bottlenecks in threa­tened western European populations of the common hamster Cricetus cricetus (L.). Conservation Genetics, 2004; 5(2): 181-193.

39. Prots B., Kagalo O. (Eds). Catalogue of habitat types of the Ukrainian Carpathians and Transcarpathian lowland. Lviv: Institute of Ecology of the Carpathians, 2013. 294 p. (In Ukrainian)

40. Ramos-Lara N., Koprowski J. L., Kryštufek B., Hoffmann I. E. Spermophilus citellus (Rodentia: Sciuridae). Mammalian Species, 2014; 46(913): 71-87.

41. Reshetnyk E.G. Systematics and geographical distribution of ground squirrels (Citellus) in the UkrSSR. Trudy Instytutu zoologii AN URSR, 1948; 1: 84-113. (In Ukrainian)

42. Reshetnyk E.G. The European ground squirrel (Citellus citellus L.) in Transcarpathia. In: Terrestrial Vertebrates of Ukraine. Kyiv, 1965. P. 122-123. (In Ukrainian)

43. Rusin M.Yu., Banaszek A., Mishta A.V. The common hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in Ukraine: evidence for population decline. Folia Zoologica, 2013; 62(3): 207-213.

44. Shaffer M.L. Minimun population sizes for species conservation. BioScience, 1981; 31(2): 131-134.

45. Skilsky I.V., Smirnov N.A., Meleshchuk L.I. Rare vertebrate animals. In: Korzhyk V.P. (Ed.). Khotyn Upland. Chernivtsi: Druk Art, 2012. P. 252-288. (In Ukrainian).

46. Sokur I.T. New data on the mammal fauna of Transcarpathia. Dopovidi AN URSR, 1949; 5: 83-91. (In Ukrainian)

47. Sokur I.T. Mammals of the Soviet Carpathians and their economic importance. Kyiv: AS UkrSSR, 1952. 68 p. (In Ukrainian)

48. Štěpánek O. Mus spicilegus Petényi v Československu. Sborník zoologické oddělení Národního Muzea v Praze, 1934; 1: 56.

49. Surov A., Banaszek A., Bogomolov P., Feoktistova N., Monecke S. Dramatic global decrease in the range and reproduction of the European hamster Cricetus cricetus. Endangered Species Research, 2016; 31: 119-145.

50. Tatarynov K. A. Mammals of the western regions of Ukraine. Kyiv: AS UkrSSR, 1956. 188 p. (In Ukrainian)

51. Tews J., Brose U., Grimm V., Tielbölger K., Wichmann M. C., Schwager M., Jeltsch F. Animal Species diversity driven by habitat heterogenity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography, 2004; 31: 79-92.

52. Turianyn I. I. Fur-bearing and industrial mammals and game birds of the Carpathians. Uzhgorod, 1975. 176 p. (In Ukrainian)

53. Turianyn I.I. Current state of some cricetids in the territory between the upper courses of the Dniester and Tisza rivers. In: Cricetids of the Ukrainian Fauna. Preprint 7.87. Kyiv: Institute of Zoology AS UkrSSR, 1987. P. 3-9. (In Russian)

54. Ulbrich K., Kayser A. A risk analysis for the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus). Biological Conservation, 2004; 117(3): 263-270.

55. Volokh A.M. The current state of populations of the steppe polecat (Mustela eversmanni Lesson, 1827) in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod University, Series Biology, 2004; 15: 105-109. (In Ukrainian)

56. Zagorodniuk I.V. Steppe fauna core of Eastern Europe: its structure and prospects of protection. Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 1999 a; No. 5: 203-210. (In Ukrainian)

57. Zagorodniuk I. The common hamster - Cricetus cricetus. Proceedings of the Theriological School, 1999 b; 2: 144-148. (In Ukrainian)

58. Zagorodniuk I.V. Mortality of animals on roads: assessment of vehicle traffic's influence at populations of wild and domestic animals. Proceedings of the Theriological School, 2006; 8: 120-125. (In Ukrainian)

59. Zagorodniuk I.V., Berezovsky V.I. Mus spicilegus (Mammalia) in the fauna of Podolia and the northern border of its range in Eastern Europe. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 1994; 73(6): 110-119. (In Russian)

60. Zagorodniuk I.V., Emelyanov I.G. Taxonomy and nomenclature of mammals of Ukraine. Proceedings of the National Museum of Natural History, 2012; 10: 5-30. (In Ukrainian)

61. Zagorodniuk I., Filipchuk N. "Bern" species of rodents in the Red Data Book of Ukraine (Spermophilus citellus, Sicista subtilis, Spalax graecus). Proceedings of the Theriological School, 1999; 2: 152-162. (In Ukrainian)

62. Zagorodniuk I.V., Emelyanov I.G., Khomenko V.N. Estimation of taxonomic diversity in faunistic communities. Reports of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 1995; No. 7: 145-148. (In Russian)

63. Zagorodniuk I., Pokynchereda V., Kyselyuk O., Dovganych Ya. Theriofauna of the Carpathian Biosphere Reserve. Vestnik zoologii, 1997; Suppl. 5: 1-60. (In Ukrainian)

64. Zagorodniuk I.V., Zizda Ju.E., Drobotun O.V. Former geographical distribution of the ground squirrel Spermophilus citellus (Rodentia, Sciuridae) in the Transcarpathians (Ukraine). Vestnik Zoologii, 2010; 44(2): 183-188. (In Ukrainian)

65. Zagorodniuk I., Korobchenko M., Parkhomenko V., Barkaszi Z. Steppe rodents at the edge of their range: a case study of Spalax microphthalmus in the north of Ukraine. Biosystems Diversity, 2018; 26(3): 188-200.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Studia biologica