STRUCTURE OF THE SOD-LITHOGENIC SOIL ON RED-CLAY BURIH: THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT

G. O. Zadorozhna


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1002.475

Abstract


The dynamics of spatial heterogeneity of the sod-lithogenic soil on red-clay burіh clays has been studied in the environmental aspect in terms of hardness. The ecomorphic analysis of vegetation of the section was carried ont. The ordination of data of soil hardness has been realized by the non-metric multidimensional scaling. The three-dimensional variant of multidimensional scaling was applied. The relationship of varying the hardness of the soil and environmental factors has been determined using phytoindicative scales. Using the technique of spatial data analysis (PCNM) the elements of spatial autocorrelation data of soil hardness and defined processes underlying its formation have been highlighted. It was established that statistically significant phytoindicative scales describe from 7 to 49% of the variability of the multidimensional measurements. Temperature value of soil and cryoregime have a value for the formation of the first coordinate axis. The axis marks the conditions distinguishing soil hardness in layers of 10–35 cm from those located above and below of the selected block. The second coordination axis reflects the opposite phenomenon in soil structure above and below the level of 20 cm and describes the representation of gigromorphes in plant community. The highest values in the formation of the third coordination axis have light scales and ombroregime. Measurement selects the contrast on the basis of hardness at the level 10–35 cm from the surrounding soil layers. During fractionation of variations hardness of the studied soil site it was established that environmental factors determine 56 % of the total variability of the results. PCNM-variables describe 7 % of the variation of indicators of soil hardness and spatial patterns deterministic environment – 10 % of feature variability. Herewith the most important environmental factors for describing of large-scale spatial component of variation of soil hardness are the content of carbonate salts, digestible forms of nitrogen, thermo- and ombroregime, salt regime and continentality climate. The components of the spatial variability of the hardness of a long-period fluctuations are associated with the distribution of plant gigromorphes. Spatial variability of detailed scale components is dependent on soil aeration and ombroregime. High-frequency periodic oscillations of hardness are related to such factors as aeration of the soil, ombroclimate and also distribution structure of trophomorphes, gigromorphes and heliomorphes.

Keywords: soil hardness, phytoindicate, multidimensional scaling.


References


1. Anderson M.J. Navigating the multiple meanings of b diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecology Letters, 2011; 14: 19-28.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x
PMid:21070562

2. Belgard A.L. Forest vegetation of the south east of the Ukraine. Kiev: KSU, 1950. 263 р. (In Russian)

3. Bobrovskij M.V. The role of the environment transforming activity of the soil fauna key species to form soil structure. In: Methodical approaches for ecological assessment of the forest cover in the small river basin. Moscow: Tovarishhestvo nauchnyh izdanij KMK, 2010. P. 40-48. (In Russian)

4. Bondar G.A., Zhukov, A.V. Plant cover ecological structure formed as a results of self-growing of the sod-lithogenic soils on loess-like clays. Visnyk of the Dnipropetrovsk State Agrarian University, 2011; 1: 54-62. (In Russian)

5. Borcard D., Legendre P., Avois-Jacquet C., Tuosimoto H. Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multi-ple scales. Ecology, 2004; 85: 1826-1832.
https://doi.org/10.1890/03-3111

6. Borcard D., Legendre P. Environmental control and spatial structure in ecological communities: an example using oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatei). Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 1994; 1: 37-61.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00714196

7. Cecilia M., Jesus H. C., Cortes С.А. Soil penetration resistance analysis by multivariate and geostatistical methods. Eng. Agric. Jaboticabal, 2012; 32(1): 91-101.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162012000100010

8. Clemens J., Schillinger M.P., Golodbach H., Huwe B. Spatial variability of N2O emissions and soil parametrs of sn arable silt loam - a field study. Biol. Fert. Soils, 1999; 28(4): 403-406.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050512

9. Demidov A.A., Kobets A.S., Gritsan Y.I., Zhukov A.V. Spatial ecology and land reclamation. Dnepropetrovsk: Publishing House "Svidler AL", 2013. 560 p. (In Russian)

10. Diduh Ya.P., Plyuta P.G. Comparative characteristic of the phytoindicator scales (termoregime and edaphic scales as examples) Russ. J. Ecol., 1994; 2: 34-43. (In Russian)

11. Dray S., Legendre P., Peres-Neto P. Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal сoordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol. Model, 2006; 196: 483-493.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015

12. Ertsen A.C.D., Alkemade J.R.M., Wassen M.J. Calibrating Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, acidity,nutrient availability and salinity in the Netherlands. Plant Ecol, 1998; 135: 113-124.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009765529310

13. Yeterevska L.V., Momot G.F., Lehtsіer L.V. Reclaimed soils: approaches to classification and taxonomy. Gruntoznavstvo, 2008; 9(3): 147-150. (In Ukraіnian)

14. Goncalves A. C.A., Folegatti M. V., Silva A.P. Estabilidade temporal da especial da umidade do solo em area irrigate por vivo central. Rev. Brasil. Cienc. Solo, 1999; 23(1): 155-164.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06831999000100019

15. Grunwald S., McSweeney K., Rooney D.J., Lowery B. Soil layer models created with profile cone pen-etrometer data. Geoderma, 2001; 1103(1-2): 181-201.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00076-3

16. Hamza, M.A., Anderson W.K. Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil Till. Res, 2005; 82(2): 121-145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009

17. Hu Y.-H, Sheng D.Y., Xiang Y.Z. et al. The environment, not space, dominantly structures the landscape patterns of the richness and composition of the tropical understory vegetation. PLoSONE, 2013; 8(11): 1.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081308
PMid:24278417 PMCid:PMC3838366

18. Jiménez Juan J., Decaëns T., Lavelle P., Rossi J. Dissecting the multi-scale spatial relationship of earthworm assemblages with soil environmental variability. BMC Ecology, 2014; 14: 26-45.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-014-0026-4
PMid:25476419 PMCid:PMC4261983

19. Karpachevskij L.O., Zubkova T.A., Tashninova L.N., Rudenko R.N. Soil cover and forest biogeoceonosis parcelar structure. Russian Forest Sciences, 2007; 6: 107-113. (In Russian)

20. Legendre P. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 1993; 74(6): 1659-1673.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1939924

21. Legendre P., Mi X., Ren H. et al. Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broadleaved forest of China. Ecology, 2009; 90: 663-674.
https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1880.1
PMid:19341137

22. Legendre P., Gallagher E.D. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia, 2001; 129: 271-280.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100716
PMid:28547606

23. Lukina N.V., Nikonov, V.V. Biogeochemical cycles in North forest in aerotechnogenic contamination: in two parts. Izd-vo Kol'skogo NC RAN, Apatity, 1996. Pt. 1-213 p., Pt. 2-192 p. (In Russian)

24. Lukina N.V., Nikonov V.V. Nutrient regime of the north taiga forests: natural and technogenic aspects. Izdatel'stvo Kol'skogo NC RAN, Apatity, 1998. 316 p. (In Russian)

25. Lukina N.V., Gorbacheva T.T., Nikonov V.V., Lukina M.A. Spatial variability of the Al-Fe-podzol acidity. Eurasian Soil Sci+, 2002; 2: 163-176. (In Russian)

26. Lukina N.V., Nikonov V.V., Isaeva L.G. Acidity and nutrient regime of the spruce forest soils In: Indigenous spruce forests: biodiversity, structure, function. Moscow: Nauka, 2006; P. 215-253. (In Russian)

27. Masjuk N.T., Bekarevich N.E. Rational use of bulk soil remediation at sites in the chernozem zone. In: The development of disturbed lands. Moscow: Nauka, 1976. P. 112-150. (In Russian)

28. Matveev N.M. The system of the A.L. Belgard ecomorphes optimization for the sake of the ecotope and biotope phytoindication. Visn. Dnipropetr. Univ. Ser. Biol. Ecol, 2003; 11(2): 105-113. (In Russian)

29. Medvedev V.V. The hardness of the soil. Kharkov: Publishing House of the KP "Urban Тypography", 2009. 152 p. (In Russian)

30. Medvedev V.V., Mel'nik A.I. Heterogeneity of Soil Agrochemical Properties in the Space and the Time. Agricultural Chemistry, 2010; 1: 20-26. (In Russian)

31. Minchin P.R. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio, 1987; 67: 1167-1179.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4061-1_9

32. Moiseev K.G. Sod-podsol sands soils density calculation on the basis of the soil penetration resistance diagrams. Eurasian Soil Sci+, 2013; 10: 1228-1233. (In Russian)

33. Murphy S.J., Audino L.D., Whitacre J. et al. Species associations structured by environment and land-use history promote beta-diversity in a temperate forest. Ecology, 2015; 96(3): 705-715.
https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0695.1
PMid:26236867

34. Novakovskij A.B. Ordination methods in the modern geobotanics (in Russian). Bulletin of the Biology Institute. Komy SC UrD RAS, 2008; 132 (10): 2-8. (In Russian)

35. Orlova M.A., Lukina N.V. & Nikonov V.V. Spruce influence on the spatial variability north taiga forests soils acidity. Russian Forest Sciences, 2003; 6: 3-11. (In Russian)

36. Oksanen J., Blanchet F.G., Kindt R. et al. Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-2. // 2011. - http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.

37. Parackova A., Zaujec A. Evaluation of human impacts on soils on the Borska lowland. Ekologia Bratislava, 2001; 20 (3): 299-304.

38. Prentice I.C. Non-metric ordination methods in ecology. Journal of Ecology, 1977; 65: 85-94.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2259064

39. Ramenskij L.G., Cacenkin I.A., Chizhikov O.N., Antipov N.A. Grasslands ecological assessment on the basis of the plant cover. Moscow: Selhozgiz, 1956. 472 p. (In Russian)

40. Ramires-Lopez L., Reina-Sanchez A., Camacho-Tamayo J.H. Variabilidad espacial de atributos fisicos de un Typic Haplustox de los Llanos Orientales de Colombia. Eng. Agric., Jaboticabal, 2008; 28(1): 55-63.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162008000100006

41. Samsonova V.P. Spatial variability of the soil properties: sod-podzol soils as example. Moscow: LKI, 2008. 160 p. (In Russian)

42. Schaffers A.P., Sykora K.V. Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements. J. Veg. Sci, 2000; 11: 225-244.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3236802

43. Selles F., Campbell C.A., McConkey B.G. et al. Relationships between biological and chemical measures of N supplying power and total N at field scale. Canad. J. Soil Sci,1999; 79: 353-366.
https://doi.org/10.4141/S98-035

44. Serafim M.E., Vitorino A.C.T., Peixoto P.P.P. et al. Intervalo hidrico otimo em um latossolo vermelho distroferrico sob diferentes sistemas de producao. Eng. Аgríc., Jaboticabal, 2008; 28(4): 654-665.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162008000400005

45. Shein Е.В. Spatial heterogeneity of the properties on the different hierarchical levels is a basis of the soils structure and functions. In: Scales effects following soils invesigation. Moscow: MGU, 2001; P. 47-61. (In Russian)

46. Shitikov V. K., Rozenberg G.S., Zinchenko T.D. Quantitative hydroecology: system identification methods. IJeVB RAN, Toljatti, 2003. 463 p. (In Russian)

47. Shtirts A. D., Zadorozhnaya G.A., Kunakh O.N., Zhukov A.V. Spatial organization of oribatid mites community (Acari: Oribatida) in soil of an agricultural field in conditions of steppe zone of Ukraine. The Kharkov Entomol. Soc. Gaz, 2013; 21(1): 49-60. (In Russian)

48. Siefert A., Ravenscroft C., Weiser M.D., Swenson N.G. Functional beta-diversity patterns reveal deterministic community assembly processes in eastern North American trees. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2013; 6: 682-691.
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12030

49. Soracco C.G., Lozano L.A., Sarli G.O. et al. Anisotropy of saturated hydraulic conductivity in a soil under conservation and no-till treatments. Soil Till. Res, 2010; 109: 18-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.03.013

50. Tarasov V.V. Flora of the Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhia regions. Dnipropetrovsk: Lira, 2012. 296 p. (in Ukrainian)

51. Tolstova Ju.N. Multidimensional scales basis. Moscow: KDU, 2006. 160. (In Russian)

52. Tryfanova M., Zadorojhna G., Zhukova J. Gray heron colony impact on soil cellulolytic acti­vity. Visnyk of Lviv University. Ser. Biol, 2014; 65: 245-254. (In Ukranian)

53. Voron Ye.A. Propetiеs of soil created by means of layerwise mine-technical and biological recultivation. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, 2010; 5: 23-28. (in Russian)

54. Wright S.A. Axis and Circumference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988. 367 p.

55. Zadorozhna G.O. The spatial organization of soddy lithogenic soils on the grey-grin clays. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Khmelnytsky Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 2012; 2(1): 48-57. (In Ukranian)
https://doi.org/10.7905/bbmspu.v1i1(4).49

56. Zagul'nova L.B., Lukina N.V., Tihonova E.V. Spatial structure of the biogeocoenotic forest cover. In: Methodical approaches for ecological assessment of the forest cover in the small river basin. Tovarishhestvo nauchnyh izdanij KMK, Moscow, 2010; 10-19. (In Russian)

57. Zagul'nova L.B., Tihonova E.V. Phytoindication of the ecological regimes in small basin. In: Methodical approaches for ecological assessment of the forest cover in the small river basin. Moscow: Tovarishhestvo nauchnyh izdanij KMK, 2010. P. 156-158. (In Russian)

58. Zhukov O.V., Zadorozhna G.O. Ecomorphic organisation of the soil body: geostatistical approach. Studia Biologica, 2015; 9(3-4): 119-128. (In Ukrainian)
https://doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0903.423

59. Zhukov A.V. Influence of usual and dual wheels on soil penetration resistance: the GIS-appoach. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 2015; 5(3): 73-100. (In Russian)

60. Zhukov A.V., Kunakh O.N., Novikova V.A. The ecomorphic organization of mesopedobionts community of oak forest with the fresh grass on arena of the Dnieper river. The Kharkov Entomol. Soc. Gaz, 2015; 23(2): 39-53. (In Russian)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Studia biologica