ADAPTIVE REACTIONS OF WHEAT PLANTS TO DROUGHT CONDITIONS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF SALICYLIC ACID

Myroslava Kobyletska, Oksana Velychko, Oksana Mamchur


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1704.749

Abstract


Background. Drought is one of the most important factors affecting plant growth and productivity. The study addressed the perspectives of usage of salicylic acid, a stress protective compound, to increase the adaptive potential of Triticum aestivum L. plants under drought conditions. The effect of salicylic acid on the photosynthetic apparatus of wheat plants under the conditions of drought with a subsequent gradual resumption of watering was investigated.
Materials and methods. Plants of the Podolyanka variety of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were the objects of our study. Seeds were pre-soaked in a solution of salicylic acid (50 mM) for 3 h. First seeds germinated in an incubator, and on the 3rd day of growth were transplanted into plastic pots (d = 14 cm). Plants were grown on soil substrate, whose humidity was maintained at 60 % of full moisture capacity – the optimal water supply. The model of drought was created by the simultaneous cessation of irrigation (30 % of soil moisture capacity) for 12 days. Upon termination of the drought, soil moisture in the pots was adjusted to 60 % of its full capacity. The control plants were grown from the seeds not treated with salicylic acid under conditions of optimal water supply (60 %). Study samples were taken from the shoots of wheat on the 7th, 9th and 12th days of the drought period and on the first day after the resumption of irrigation (14 days). The concentrations of TBA-active products, chlorophyll, carotenoids, glucose, sucrose and chlorophyllase activity were determined.
Results. The influence of salicylic acid on the content of chlorophyll, carotenoids and TBA-active products along with chlorophyllase activity in shoots of wheat under the drought conditions on the early stages of ontogenesis was determined. It was found that both drought and salicylic acid modify the content of chlorophyll and carotenoids in the shoots of Triticum aestivum L., apparently by altering their metabolism. Chlorophyllase plays an important role in the adaptation of photosynthetic apparatus to the drought conditions. Our results suggest that salicylic acid causes an increase in the content of photosynthetic pigments and a decrease in chlorophyllase activity in drought conditions. In addition, salicylate causes the accumulation of glucose and sucrose in the shoot tissues of wheat plants under stressful conditions.
Conclusions. Our research suggests participation of salicylic acid in the plants’ adaptation processes under the conditions of moisture deficiency. It was also found that under the effect of salicylic acid the content of TBA-active products decreases in the plant shoots under the conditions of drought. Considering the fact that the content of TBA-active products is an important indicator of lipid peroxidation intensity, the decrease of this index reveals the reduced activity of free radical processes in plant tissues under the effect of salicylic acid. Thus, it can be assumed that SA has a positive effect on plant metabolism under drought conditions.


Keywords


adaptation, drought stress, Triticum aestivum L., TBA-active products, photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyllase, carbohydrates

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anesheh, H. P., Emam, Y., Ashraf, M., & Foolad, M. R. (2012). Exogenous application of salicyclic acid and chlomequat chloride alleviate negative effects of drought stress in wheat. Advanced Studies in Biology, 4(11), 501-520.
Google Scholar

Barnaby, J. Y., Kim, M., Bauchan, G., Bunce, J., Reddy, V., & Sicher, R. C. (2013). Drought responses of foliar metabolites in three maize hybrids differing in water stress tolerance. PLoS One, 8(10), e77145. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077145
Crossref ● PubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Buysse, J., & Merckx, R. (1993). An improved colorimetric method to quantify sugar content of plant tissue. Journal of Experimental Botany, 44(10), 1627-1629. doi:10.1093/jxb/44.10.1627
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Guidi, L., Lo Piccolo, E., & Landi, M. (2019). Chlorophyll fluorescence, photoinhibition and abiotic stress: does it make any difference the fact to be a C3 or C4 species? Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 174. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00174
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Gupta, D. K., Palma, J. M., & Corpas, F. J. (Eds.). (2015). Reactive oxygen species and oxidative damage in plants under stress. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20421-5
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Hatanaka, R., & Sugawara, Y. (2010). Development of desiccation tolerance and vitrification by preculture treatment in suspension-cultured cells of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. Planta, 231(4), 965-976. doi: 10.1007/s00425-010-1101-5
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Iusypiva, Т., & Borisova, О. (2015). Man-caused impact on soluble carbohydrate form сoncentration dynamics in Acer L. representatives leaves. Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Biology, 69, 174-182.
Google Scholar

Jo, M., Knapp, M., Boggs, D. G., Brimberry, M., Donnan, P. H., & Bridwell-Rabb, J. (2023). A structure-function analysis of chlorophyllase reveals a mechanism for activity regulation dependent on disulfide bonds. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 299(3), 102958. doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2023.102958
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Khan, M. I. R., Fatma, M., Per, T. S., Anjum, N. A., & Khan, N. A. (2015). Salicylic acid-induced abiotic stress tolerance and underlying mechanisms in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00462
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Kobyletska, M. S. (2020). Fatty acid composition of corn and wheat plant shoots under the action of salicylate in drought conditions. Studia Biologica, 14(3), 91-104. doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1403.629
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Li, M., & Kim, C. (2022). Chloroplast ROS and stress signaling. Plant Communications, 3(1), 100264. doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100264
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Magwanga, R. O., Lu, P., Kirungu, J. N., Lu, H., Wang, X., Cai, X., Zhou, Z., Zhang, Z., Salih,ìH., Wang, K., & Liu, F. (2018). Characterization of the late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins family and their role in drought stress tolerance in upland cotton. BMC Genetics, 19(1), 6. doi:10.1186/s12863-017-0596-1
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Moustakas, M., Sperdouli, I., & Moustaka, J. (2022). Early drought stress warning in plants: color pictures of photosystem II photochemistry. Climate, 10(11), 179. doi:10.3390/cli10110179
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Nahar, K., Rhaman, M. S., Parvin, K., Bardhan, K., Marques, D. N., García-Caparrós, P., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2022). Arsenic-induced oxidative stress and antioxidant defense in plants. Stresses, 2(2), 179-209. doi:10.3390/stresses2020013
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Nisar, N., Li, L., Lu, S., Khin, N. C., & Pogson, B. J. (2015). Carotenoid metabolism in plants. Molecular Plant, 8(1), 68-82. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.007
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Nxele, X., Klein, A., & Ndimba, B. K. (2017). Drought and salinity stress alter ROS accumulation, water retention, and osmolyte content in sorghum plants. South African Journal of Botany, 108, 261-266. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2016.11.003
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Sadasivam, S., & Manickam, A. (2007). Biochemical methods (pp. 42-43). New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd Publishers.
Google Scholar

Skubacz, A., Daszkowska-Golec, A., & Szarejko, I. (2016). The role and regulation of ABI5 (ABA-Insensitive 5) in plant development, abiotic stress responses and phytohormone crosstalk. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1884. doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01884
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Uarrota, V. G., Stefen, D. L. V., Leolato, L. S., Gindri, D. M., & Nerling, D. (2018). Revisiting carotenoids and their role in plant stress responses: from biosynthesis to plant signaling mechanisms during stress. In D. Gupta, J. Palma & F. Corpas, (Eds.), Antioxidants and antioxidant enzymes in higher plants (pp. 207-232). Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75088-0_10
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Ullah, A., Manghwar, H., Shaban, M., Khan, A. H., Akbar, A., Ali, U., Ali, E., & Fahad, S. (2018). Phytohormones enhanced drought tolerance in plants: a coping strategy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(33), 33103-33118. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3364-5
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Voitsekhivska, O. V., Kapustian, A. V., Kosyk, O. I., Musiienko, M. M., Olkhovych, O. P., Parshykova, T. V. (Ed.). (2010). Fiziolohiya roslyn. Praktychnyy kurs [Plant physiology. Practical course]. Lutsk: Teren.

Wang, Z., Li, G., Sun, H., Ma, L., Guo, Y., Zhao, Z., Gao, H., & Mei, L. (2018). Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron transport chain in young apple tree leaves. Biology Open, 7(11), bio035279. doi:10.1242/bio.035279
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Yang, X., Lu, M., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., & Chen, S. (2021). Response mechanism of plants to drought stress. Horticulturae, 7(3), 50. doi:10.3390/horticulturae7030050
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Yilmaz, C., & Gökmen, V. (2016). Chlorophyll. In B. Caballero, P. M. Finglas, F. Toldrá (Eds.), Encyclopedia of food and health (pp. 37-41). Academic Press. doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00147-1
CrossrefGoogle Scholar


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Myroslava Kobyletska, Oksana Velychko, Oksana Mamchur

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.