STRUCTURE OF BREEDING BIRD COMMUNITIES IN URBAN AND SUB-URBAN GREEN AREAS OF LVIV CITY WITH DIFFERENT DEGREE OF ANTHROPOGENIC PRESSURE

G. Kuzyo


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1003.489

Abstract


Difference in structure of breeding bird communities in the habitats with varying degrees of human activity is considered. Hemeroby classification, taking into account the cumulative effects of many factors on the habitat was applied. According to this classification, the model plots in Lviv city and suburbs areas belong to groups of oligo-, meso-, α-eu- and β-euhemerobic habitats. It is established that on the investigated territory, there is no inverse relationship between the rates of species richness and degree of anthropogenic pressure. The highest values of biodiversity are inherent to oligohe­merobic habitats with minor anthropogenic impacts and β-euhemerobic habitats with continuous and strong anthropogenic impacts. The number of breeding species in all β-euhe­merobic plots (N = 58) is even greater than on oligohemerobic plots (N = 40). The lowest indices of biodiversity and breeding density were found on α-euhemerobic areas. Differences were found when comparing forest habitats of oligo- and mesohe­merobic groups. In the mesohemerobic habitats, there are fewer species (N = 22) and lower average breeding density (32.7 pairs/10 ha), while both oligoheme­robic areas these are N = 33 and 50.2 pairs/10 ha respectively. Indices of Shannon, Margalef and Menghini also have lower values for the mesohemerobic areas, and dominance index of Berger–Parker, on the contrary, is higher. Unlike the mesohemerobic habitats in the oligoheme­robic habitats breeding species listed in the Red Book of Ukraine were observed. Thus, in more intensively loaded forests there is a depletion of biodiversity is observed. Environmental groups differ by the way of breeding due to more cavity-nes­ting species in the oligohemerobic habitats; by foraging substrate – due to a greater part of urbanized species in the mesohemerobic habitats.


Keywords


breeding ornithofauna, gradient of urbanization, hemeroby, urban, suburban zone, ecological groups

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Babych О. Geological conditions of forest geosystems Lviv's suburban area. Visnyk of Ternopil University. Biological Series, 2010; 27(1): 278-283. (In Ukrainian)

2. Belik V. P. Steppe birds Pridonya: formation, anthropogenic transformation and protection issues. Rostov-on-Don, 2000. 276 p. (In Russian)

3. Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A., Mustoe S.H. Bird Census Techniques, 2nd ed. London: Academic Press, 2000.

4. Bokotey А.А. The number of thrushes of Lviv and their bioindication role. The problems of urban ecology and phytomelioration: proceedings of the scientific conference. Lviv, 1991. 118 p. (In Ukrainian)

5. Chacea J.F., Walsh J.J. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006; 74: 46-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.08.007

6. Debrinyuk Yu.M., Prydka P.P. Forest stand of Ukrainian Roztochya: areal, silvicultiral and biometric features. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 2013; 23(16): 9-22. (In Ukrainian)

7. Gorban І., Gorban L.,Kyjko А. Regionally rare species of birds. Visnyk of Lviv University. Biological Series, 2006; 42: 3-14. (In Ukrainian)

8. Jalas, J. Hemerobe und hemerochore Pflanzenarten. Ein terminologischer Reformversuch, [Hemerobic and hemerochoric and plant species. An attempt of a terminological reform]. Acta Societatis pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, 1955, 72 , 1-15.

9. Khornyak М. Synurbization of Woodpigeon (Columba palumbus L.) in Lviv. Visnyk of Lviv University. Biological Series, 2003; 34: 173-179. (In Ukrainian)

10. Kiedrzynski M., Kiedrzynska E., Witoslawski P. et al. Historical land use, actual vegetation, and the hemeroby levels in ecological evaluation of an urban river valley in perspective of its rehabilitation plan. Pol. J. Environ. Stud, 2014; 23(1): 109-117.

11. Kowarik I. Some responses of flora and vegetation to urbanization in Central Europe. In: Sukopp H. et al. (Eds) Urban Ecology. Hague: Academic Publishing, 1990. P. 45-74.

12. Kucheryavyj V. Sustainable development: global, regional and local problems of environmental management. Proceedings of Shevchenko Scientific Society. Environmental Problems and Biodiversity Lviv Region, 2001: 19-27. (In Ukrainian)

13. Kuzyakin А.P. Zoogeography of USSR. Proceedings of Moscow Pedagogical Institute named after N.K. Krupskaya, 1962; 109(1): 3-182. (In Russian)

14. Nielsen A., van den Bosch M., Maruthaveeran S., van den Bosch C. Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosyst, 2014; 17: 305-327.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1

15. Pasichnyk А.О. Nest placing of the Magpie in Lviv. Berkut, 1995; 4(1-2): 47-49. (In Ukrainian)

16. Schneider S.C., Fischer J.D., Miller J.R. Two-sided edge responses of avian communities in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosystems, 2015; 18(2): 539-551.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0418-4

17. Senyk М.А, Khornyak М.М. Contemporary changes in the ornithofauna of Lviv city. Berkut, 2003; 12(1-2): 9-13. (In Ukrainian)

18. Skilsky І.V. Patterns of habitat distribution of birds in Chernivtsi: spatio-temporal aspect. Berkut, 2006; 15(1-2): 81-85. (In Ukrainian)

19. Stegmann B.K. Basics ornithogeographic division Palearctic based on the study type avifauna. Izv. AS USSR. Ser. Biol, 1936; 2(3): 523-563. (In Russian)

20. Tatarynov K.А. Population structure of blackbirds in Lviv city. The study of birds of the USSR, their protection and rational use: conference proceedings. Leningrad, 1986. 267 p. (In Russian)

21. Tatarynov K.А. Synantropisation of blackbird in Western Ukraine. Vestnik Zoologii, 1988; 2: 73-74. (In Russian)

22. The history of the towns and villages of the Ukrainian SSR: The 26 t. Lviv region / Ed. Tronko P. Т. Kyiv: Home Edition URE AN UkrSSR, 1968: 980 p. (In Ukrainian)

23. Tsaryk J.V., Senyk M.A., Gorban I.M. et al. Ecotones between forest and meadows as concentration centres of birds variety. Ecology and Noospherology, 2006; 17(1-2): 78-85. (In Ukrainian)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Studia biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.