MORPHOLOGY AND VASCULAR ANATOMY OF THE FLOWER SANSEVIERIA SUFFRUTICOSA N. E. BR. (ASPARAGACEAE LUSS.)

O. Fishchuk, A. Odintsova


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0701.260

Abstract


The results of studing flower morphology, vascular anatomy and gynoecium micromorphology of Sansevieria suffruticosa N. E. Br. are presented. In this species, there is a flower tube of semiadnated tepals and stamens and also syncarpous gyno­ecium having septal nectaries. According to our data, the vascular system of this flower is comparable with the vascular system of the flower having free tepals, stamens and carpels because all of them have independent innervation. The carpel trace consists of dorsal bundle and a median ventral bundle which bifurcated in two ventral bundles, fused with dorsal bundle in the ovary roof. The ovule is innervated from the median ventral bundle. The gynoecium of Sansevieria suffruticosa is hemisyncarpous, but it has a short synascidiate zone which is typical for the eusyncarpous gynoecium. The hemisynascidiate (fertile), hemisymplicate (higher part of the ovary) and asymplicate (style and stigma) zones are located above a synascidiate zone. The septal nectary in the ovary corresponds to the inner non-labyrinthine distinct type, and in the ovary roof – to the outer labyrinthine type. The high base and roof of the ovary, and also long septal nectary are characteristic features of the inner gynoecium structure of this species. 


Keywords


Sansevieria, flower morphology, vascular anatomy, gynoecium, septal nectaries

References


1. Барыкина Р.П., Веселова Т.Д., Девятов, А.Г. и др. Справочник по ботанической микротехнике. Основы и методы. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 2004. 287 с.

2. Волгин С.А., Тихомиров В.Н. О структурных типах моноциклического синкарпного гинецея покрытосеменных. Бюлл. МОИП, отд. биол, 1980; 85(6): 63–74.

3. APG (The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard, 1998; 85(4): 531-553.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2992015

4. APG II (The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc, 2003; 141: 399-436.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x

5. APG III (The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc, 2009; 161: 105-121.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x

6. Bos J.J. Dracaenaceae / The families and genera of vascular plants. III. Flowering plants: Monocotyledons: Lilianae (except Orchidaceae). Vol. ed. K. Kubitzki et al. Springer, 1998. Р. 238-241.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03533-7_30

7. Daumann E. Das Blütennektarium der Monocotyledonen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung. Feddes Repert, 1970; 80(7-8): 463-590.
https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.4910800702

8. Kim J. H., Kim D. K., Fores T. F. et al. Molecular phylogenetics of Ruscaceae sensu lato and related families (Asparagales) based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences. Ann. Bot, 2010; 106: 775-780.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq167
PMid:20929900 PMCid:PMC2958784

9. Leinfellner W. Der Bauplan des synkarpen Gynözeums. Österr. Bot. Zeitschr, 1950; 97(3-5): 403-436.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01763317

10. Remizova M., Sokoloff D., Rudall P.J. Evolution of the monocot gynoecium: evidence from comparative morphology and development in Tofieldia, Japonolirion, Petrosavia and Narthecium. Pl. Syst. Evol, 2006; 258: 183-209.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-005-0397-3

11. Schmid R. Functional interpretations of the morphology and anatomy of septal nectaries. Acta Bot. Neerl, 1985; 34(1): 125-128.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1985.tb01862.x

12. Takhtajan A. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. 1997. 643 p.

13. Thorne R .F., Reveal J. L. An updated classification of the class Magnoliopsida. Bot. Rev, 2007; 73(2): 67-182.
https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2007)73[67:AUCOTC]2.0.CO;2

14. Van Heel W. A. On the development of some gynoecia with septal nectaries. Blumea, 1988; 33(2): 477-504.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2013 Studia biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.