IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL PARAMETERS OF CELL TRANSITION FROM THE STATE OF PROLIFERATION TO THE STATE OF DIFFERENTIATION

I. V. Stadnyk, D. I. Sanagursky


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0803.363

Abstract


This paper describes by mathematical modeling changes in the genetic control of cell in a state of proliferation and differentiation. It was constructed seventeen response surfaces for each of the speed rate constants that characterize the transformations in these systems. Based on the constructed models, it was revealed which of the parameters make the largest contribution to the value of each of the constants and which para­meters have the greatest influence on the proliferation and differentiation of cells. It was established that the greatest contribution to the rate of reaction constant of changes in the genetic controlling systems in cells in the state of proliferation have histone genes and cyclin-dependent kinases, and a little less the genes – stimulators of proliferation and transcription factors; in cells in a state of differentiation – inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases, and equally transcription factors, cell cycle genes, gene transcription, structural genes and hyperpolarization of the cell membrane. As result, we got data that the value concentration of cyclin – dependent kinases and inhibitors of cyclin – dependent kinases in the cell is the trigger that determines whether a cell proliferate or differentiate.


Keywords


response surface, mathematical modeling, genetic control, proliferation, differentiation

References


1. Csete M.E., Doyle J.C. Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science, 2002; 295: 1664-1665.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1069981
PMid:11872830

2. De Jong H. Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. Journal of Сomputational Biology, 2002; 9 (1): 67-103
https://doi.org/10.1089/10665270252833208
PMid:11911796

3. Ingalls B. Mathematical modeling in systems biology. Applied Mathematics, 2012; 312 p.

4. Mykshyna V.S. Mathematical models in health reservation. Mathematical Modeling, 2009; 21 (4): 111-121. (In Russian)

5. Rubin A.B. / Kinetics of biological processes. Soross Educational Journal, 1998; 10: 84-91. (In Russian)

6. Samsonova M., Serov V.N. NetWork: An interactive interface to the tools for analysis of genetic network structure and dynamics. Proc. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. (PSB'99), 1999; 4: 102-111.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814447300_0010

7. Shidlovskiy N.P. Theorey and methodology development of a system mobiled pharmacy - complexed. Alphabitmedical, 2005; 8: 24-26.

8. Stadnyk I. Role of transmembrane potential and cyclin-dependent kinases in control of cell proliferation and differentiation. Journal of Lviv University. Seria Biologica, 2014; 64: 33-51. (In Ukrainian)

9. Stadnyk I., Sanagursky D. Kinetic model of changes in genetic controlling systems in cells in a state of proliferation and differentiation. Biophysical Journal, 2013; 1(29): 63-70. (In Ukrainian)

10. Stadnyk I.V., Sanagursky D.I. Description of changes in genetic control in cells in a state of proliferation and differentiation. Studia Biologica, 2014; 8(1): 53-62. (In Ukrainian)
https://doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0801.329

11. Zien A., Küffner R. Analysis of gene expression data with pathway scores. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. (ISMB 2000), 2000; 407-417.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Studia biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.