DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES IN GENETIC CONTROL IN CELLS AT THEIR PROLIFERATION AND DIFFERENTIATION

I. V. Stadnyk, D. I. Sanagursky


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0801.329

Abstract


On the basis of previously built kinetic model of changes in genetic controlling systems in cells at their proliferation and differentiation, it was held that these changes take place on gene, chromosome, membrane and ion levels. The mathematic description of kinetic model of changes in genetic controlling systems in cells either in a state of proliferation and in a state of differentiation was made. Differential equations systems which describe these changes were solved using numerical integration method. Parameters of kinetic model of changes in genetic controlling systems in proliferating and differentiating cells were presented graphically. It was found, that when reaction speed constants are minimal (k = 10-8–10-6), concentration of kinetic model parame­ters is constant during the whole time, and when they are maximal (k = 0.25–1) – non-linear time changes of parameters, which characteristic for living systems. These results postulate that changes in genetic controlling systems in living cells take place when reaction speed constants are maximal.


Keywords


proliferation, differentiation, numerical integration, differential equations system, kinetic model

References


1. Дьяконов В.П. MATLAB и SIMULINK для радиоинженеров. Москва: ДМК-Пресс, 2011. 976 с.

2. Самарский А.А. Введение в численные методы. Москва: Наука, 1987. 487 с.

3. Allen R.E. Sheehan S.M., Taylor R.G. Hepatocyte growth factor activates quiescent skeletal muscle satellite cells in vitro. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 1995; 165(2): 307-312.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041650211
PMid:7593208

4. Binggeli R., Weinstein R.C. Membrane potentials and sodium channels: Hypotheses for growth regulation and cancer formation based on changes in sodium channels and gap junctions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1986; 123: 377-401.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80209-0

5. Canalis E., Economides A.N., Gazzero E. Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Their Antagonists, and the Skeleton. Endocrinology Review, 2003; 24(2): 218-235.
https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2002-0023
PMid:12700180

6. Coila B. Cell differentiation and proliferation biology. Biology, 2009; 32: 241-250.

7. Cone C.D. Unified theory on the basic mechanism of normal mitotic control and oncogenesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1971; 30: 151-181.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90042-7

8. Floss T., Arnold H.H., Braun T. A role for FGF-6 in skeletal muscle regeneration. Genes Development, 1997; 11(16): 2040-2051.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.16.2040
PMid:9284044 PMCid:PMC316448

9. Fϋchtbauer E.M., Westphal H. MyoD and myogenin are coexpressed in regenerating skeletal muscle of the mouse. Developmental Dynamics: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 1992; 193(1): 34-39.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001930106
PMid:1311614

10. Grounds M.D., Garrett K.L., Lai M.C. Identification of skeletal muscle precursor cells in vivo by use of MyoD1 and myogenin probes. Cell and Tissue Research, 1992; 267(1): 99-104.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318695
PMid:1310442

11. Ho L., Ronan J., Wu J. An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is essential for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009; 106(13): 5181-5186.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812889106
PMid:19279220 PMCid:PMC2654396

12. Kai X., Dong D., Shanshan Z. Identification of proliferation/differentiation switch in the cellular network of multicellular organisms. Plos Computational Biology, 2006; 4: 124-148.

13. Kastner S., Elias M.C., Rivera A.J. Gene Expression Patterns of the Fibroblast Growth Factors and Their Receptors During Myogenesis of Rat Satellite Cells. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 2000; 48(8): 1079-1096.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002215540004800805
PMid:10898801

14. Kim Y., Zheng X., Zheng Y. Proliferation and differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells lacking all lamins. Cell Research, 2013; 55: 213-226.
https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2013.118
PMid:23979018 PMCid:PMC3847566

15. Lee M.H., Javed A., Kim H.J. Transient upregulation of CBFA1 in response to bone morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor β1 in C2C12 myogenic cells coincides with suppression of the myogenic phenotype but is not sufficient for osteoblast differentiation. Journal Cell Biochemistry, 1999; 73: 114-125.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19990401)73:1<114::AID-JCB13>3.0.CO;2-M

16. Minoo P., Sullivan W., Solomon L. Loss of Proliferative Potential during Terminal Differentiation Coincides with the Decreased Abundance of a Subset of Heterogeneous Ribonuclear Proteins. Journal Cell Biology, 1989; 109(5): 1937-1946
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.109.5.1937
PMid:2808514

17. Putney L.K. Na-H Exchange-dependent Increase in Intracellular pH Times G2/M Entry and Transition. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2003; 278: 44645-44649.
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M308099200
PMid:12947095

18. Ravasi T. The transcriptional network that controls growth arrest and differentiation in a human myeloid leukemia cell line. Nature Genetics, 2009; 41: 553-562.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.375
PMid:19377474

19. Seale P., Sabourin L.A., Girgis-Gabardo A. Pax7 is required for the specification of myogenic satellite cells. Cell, 2000; 102(6): 777-786.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00066-0

20. Sheehan S.M., Allen R.E. Skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation in response to members of the fibroblast growth factor family and hepatocyte growth factor. Journal Cell Physiology, 1999; 181(3): 499-506.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199912)181:3<499::AID-JCP14>3.0.CO;2-1

21. Stein L.J., Lian J.B., Stein J.S. Control of cell cycle regulated histone genes during proliferation and differentiation. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord, 1996; 3: 84-90.

22. Sundelacruz S., Levin M., Kaplan D. Membrane Potential Controls Adipogenic and Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. PLoS ONE, 2008; 3(11): 325-342.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003737
PMid:19011685 PMCid:PMC2581599

23. Sundelacruz S., Levin M., Kaplan D. Role of Membrane Potential in Regulation of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation. Stem Cell Review and Reproduction, 2009; 5: 231-246.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-009-9080-2
PMid:19562527

24. Tatsumi R., Anderson J.E., Nevoret C.J. HGF/SF Is Present in Normal Adult Skeletal Muscle and Is Capable of Activating Satellite Cells. Developmental Biology, 1998; 194(1): 114-128.
https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1997.8803
PMid:9473336

25. Tatsumi R., Hattori A., Ikeuchi Y. Release of Hepatocyte Growth Factor from Mechanically Stretched Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells and Role of pH and Nitric Oxide. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2002; 13(8): 2909-2918.
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e02-01-0062
PMid:12181355 PMCid:PMC117951

26. Yablonka-Reuveni Z., Seger R., Rivera A.J. Fibroblast Growth Factor Promotes Recruitment of Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells in Young and Old Rats. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 1999; 47(1): 23-42.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002215549904700104
PMid:9857210

27. Yablonka-Reuveni Z., Rivera A.J. Temporal expression of regulatory and structural muscle proteins during myogenesis of satellite cells on isolated adult rat fibers. Developmental Biology, 1994; 164(2): 588-603.
https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1994.1226
PMid:7913900 PMCid:PMC4128087

28. Zammit P.S., Golding J.P., Nagata Y. Muscle satellite cells adopt divergent fates: a mechanism for self-renewal. The Journal of Cell Biology, 2004; 166(3): 347-357.
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200312007
PMid:15277541 PMCid:PMC2172269

29. Zavitz K., Zipursky L. Controlling cell proliferation in differentiating tissues: genetic analysis of negative regulators of Gl-S-phase progression. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 1997; 9: 773-781.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80077-4

30. Zhao X., Yang Z., Liang G. et al. Dual effects of isoflurane on proliferation, differentiation and survival in human neuroprogenitor cells. Anesthesiology, 2013; 118(3): 537-549.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182833fae
PMid:23314167 PMCid:PMC3580019


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Studia biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.