FEATURES OF THE 8-OXO-7,8-DIHYDRO-2′-dGTP BEHAVIOR IN ACTIVE SITE OF HUMAN DNA POLYMERASE β: STRUCTURAL INVESTIGATION IN SILICO

A. Yu. Nyporko


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0801.340

Abstract


The oxidized bases in the composition of DNA as well as DNA precursors (desoxynucleotide triphosphates, dNTPs) appearing in living cell as a result of oxidative stress are the one of major sources of genomic instability. Among oxidized forms of nitrogenous bases, the 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2-deoxyguanine (8odG, 8-oxo-dG) is the most ubiquitous. This compound has a high mutagenic potential due to its ability to preferably interact with adenine instead of cytosine. In particular, the 8odG in the composition of the incoming nucleotide triphosphate (8-oxo-GTP) is able to immediately incorporate into the growing DNA chain and, thus, to cause the invert replacement dA → dC because it is possible to pair with the incoming dCTP as well as dATP in the next round of DNA replication. The efficiency of 8oxo-dG incorporation in growing DNA clearly depends on the nature of appropriate DNA polymerases. One of the most sensitive to 8-oxo-dGTP is the eukaryotic DNA polymerase β (pol β). The binding of 8-oxo-dGTP in the active center of pol β can result in two different molecular events. First of them is the incorporation of 8oxoguanine into a growing DNA chain, the other is a discrimination of 8-oxo-dGTP from the active center. While effects of incorporation of this modified guanine in DNA are well studied, the immediate consequences of 8-oxo-dGTP discrimination are still unclear. The behavior of 8-oxo-dGTP molecule in the area of the active site of human DNA polymerase β was investigated using molecular dynamics (MD) calculation. The principle phenomenon revealed as investigation results is existence of two cardinally different models of behavior inherent to 8-oxo-dGTP molecule. In two cases the ligand molecules loses the connections with template dA and starts to migrate inside of enzyme space (migrate trajectories). In the other two cases 8-oxo-dGTP stably stays in DNA polymerase active site, “keeps in touch” with template nucleotide and maintains the hydrogen bonds with it (stable trajectories). The spatial structure of 8-oxo-dGTP in stable trajectories appears to be sufficiently rigid despite the presence of number of bonds around which the free rotation is possible, and its conformational energy is characterized by high stability over the time of studied MD. Average values of energy (-10229.7 and -10227.1 kJ/mol) are practically the same for both cases. Amino acid microenvironment of 8-oxo-dGTP also practically doesn’t change over the studied MD interval. Thus, stable variants of 8-oxo-dGTP behavior evidently correspond to case of the further incorporation modified 8-oxo-dG into growing DNA strand. The behavior of 8-oxo-dGTP molecule in migrate trajectories is significantly more complicated. The 8-oxo-dGTP loses the Н-bonds with template dA6 (at 11 and 6.5 ns of MD in first and second case respectively) and starts to migrate in DNA polymerase space. The 8-oxo-dGTP spatial structure regularly exhibits much more flexibility in comparison to itself behavior in stable trajectories that reflects in corresponded values of individual atomic fluctuations. However, contrary to the expectations the general levels of conformational energy of 8-oxo-dGTP as well as energy fluctuation patterns in both migratory trajectories are completely time stable. The average values of conformational energy are -9938.6 and -10018.6 kJ/mol for trajectories 1 and 2 respectively that is slightly more than corresponded values for stable trajectories. The 8-oxo-dGTP movement pathways of don’t coincide each other that is confirmed by differences of their conformational spaces and amino acid microenvironment. It seems to be the most important that 8-oxo-dGTP not only doesn’t leave the enzyme space but directly prevent transition of DNA polymerase from closed to open conformation as well as the further binding of incoming dNTP. This observation lets a possibility to consider it as natural inhibitor of DNA pol β activity and possible intracellular regulator which mediates the direct transition of the cell from normal state to programmed cell death omitting the malignancy stage.


Keywords


8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-dGTP, 8-oxo-dGTP, DNA polymerase β, mole­cular dynamics, structural analysis, delayed dissociation

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Batra V.K., Beard W.A., Hou E.W. et al. Mutagenic conformation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-dGTP in the confines of a DNA polymerase active site. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 2010; 17(7): 889-890.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1852
PMid:20526335 PMCid:PMC2921931

2. Batra V.K., Shock D.D., Beard W.A. et al. Binary complex crystal structure of DNA polymerase β reveals multiple conformations of the templating 8-oxoguanine lesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2012; 109(1): 113-118.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112235108
PMid:22178760 PMCid:PMC3252918

3. Beard W.A., Batra V.K., Wilson S.H. DNA polymerase structure-based insight on the mutagenic properties of 8-oxoguanine. Mutat Res, 2010; 703(1): 18-23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.07.013
PMid:20696268 PMCid:PMC3023916

4. Berdis A. J. Mechanisms of DNA polymerases. Chem. Rev, 2009; 109(7): 2862-2879.
https://doi.org/10.1021/cr800530b
PMid:19489544

5. Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res, 2000; 28: 235-242.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.235
PMid:10592235 PMCid:PMC102472

6. Brown J.A., Duym W.W., Fowler J.D., Suo Z. Single-turnover kinetic analysis of the mutagenic potential of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine during gap-filling synthesis catalyzed by human DNA polymerases λ and β. J. Mol. Biol, 2007; 367: 1258-1269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.01.069
PMid:17321545

7. Bussi G., Donadio D., Parrinello M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys, 2007; 126: 014101.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2408420
PMid:17212484

8. Cadet J., Wagner J.R. DNA base damage by reactive oxygen species, oxidizing agents, and UV radiation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol, 2013; 5(2): pii a012559.
https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a012559
PMid:23378590 PMCid:PMC3552502

9. Cadet J., Douki T., Gasparutto D., Ravanat J.L. Oxidative damage to DNA: formation, measurement and biochemical features. Mutat. Res, 2003; 531(1-2): 5-23.
https://doi.org/10.1615/JEnvPathToxOncol.v23.i1.30

10. Chen V.B., Arendall W.B. 3rd, Headd J.J. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr, 2010; 66(Pt 1): 12-21.
https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909042073
PMid:20057044 PMCid:PMC2803126

11. Darden T., York D., Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: An Nlog(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys, 1993; 98: 10089-10092.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464397

12. Das B., Meirovitch H., Navon I.M. Performance of hybrid methods for large-scale unconstrained optimization as applied to models of proteins. J. Comput. Chem, 2003; 24: 1222-12231.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10275
PMid:12820130

13. Davis I.W., Leaver-Fay A., Chen V.B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res, 2007; 35 (Web Server issue): W375-383.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm216
PMid:17452350 PMCid:PMC1933162

14. Dizdaroglu M. Oxidatively induced DNA damage: mechanisms, repair and disease. Cancer Lett, 2012; 327(1-2): 26-47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2012.01.016
PMid:22293091

15. Einolf H.J., Guengerich F.P. Fidelity of nucleotide insertion at 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine by mammalian DNA polymerase delta. Steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetic analysis. J. Biol. Chem, 2001; 276: 2763764-3771.
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M006696200
PMid:11110788

16. Eoff R.L., Irimia A., Angel K.C. et al. Hydrogen bonding of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxodeoxyguanosine with a charged residue in the little finger domain determines miscoding events in Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA polymerase Dpo4. J. Biol. Chem, 2007; 282(27): 19831-19843.
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M702290200
PMid:17468100

17. Feig D.I., Reid T.M., Loeb L.A. Reactive oxygen species in tumorigenesis, Cancer Res, 1994; 541890s-1894s.

18. Guex N., Peitsch M.C. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis, 1997; 18: 2714-2723.
https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150181505
PMid:9504803

19. Hockney R. W., Goel S. P., Eastwood J. Quiet High resolution computer models of a plasma. J. Comp. Phys, 1974; 14: 148-158.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(74)90010-2

20. Hess B., Kutzner C., van der Spoel D., Lindhal E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. Chem. Theory Comput, 2008; 4: 435-447.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ct700301q
PMid:26620784

21. Hübscher U., Spadari S., Villani G., Maga G. DNA Polymerases: Discovery, characterization and functions in cellular DNA transactions. World Scientific, New Jersey, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814299176

22. Jena N. R. DNA damage by reactive species: Mechanisms, mutation and repair. J. Biosci, 2012; 37(3): 503-517.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-012-9218-2
PMid:22750987

23. Johansson M.U., Zoete V., Michielin O., Guex N. Defining and searching for structural motifs using DeepView/Swiss-PdbViewer. BMC Bioinformatics, 2012; 13: 173
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-173
PMid:22823337 PMCid:PMC3436773

24. Katafuchi A., Nohmi T. DNA polymerases involved in the incorporation of oxidized nucleotides into DNA: their efficiency and template base preference. Mutat Res, 2010; 703(1): 24-23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.06.004
PMid:20542140

25. Katafuchi A., Sassa A., Niimi N. et al. Critical amino acids in human DNA polymerases η and κ involved in erroneous incorporation of oxidized nucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res, 2010; 38: 859-867.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1095
PMid:19939936 PMCid:PMC2817480

26. Kunkel T. A. DNA replication fidelity. J. Biol. Chem, 2004; 279(17): 16895-16898
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R400006200
PMid:14988392

27. MacKerell A.D Jr., Banavali N., Foloppe N. Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids. Biopolymers, 2000-2001; 56(4): 257-265.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0282(2000)56:4<257::AID-BIP10029>3.0.CO;2-W

28. Mackerell A.D. Jr., Feig M., Brooks C.L. 3rd. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem, 2004; 25(11): 1400-1415.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20065
PMid:15185334

29. Maiorov V. N., Crippen G.M. Size-independent comparison of protein three-dimensional structures. Proteins, 1995; 22: 273-283
https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340220308
PMid:7479700

30. Mahoney M.W., Jorgensen W.L. A five-site model for liquid water and the reproduction of the density anomaly by rigid, non-polarizable potential functions. J. Chem. Phys, 2000; 112: 8910-8922.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481505

31. Markkanen E., Hübscher U., van Loon B. Regulation of oxidative DNA damage repair: the adenine:8-oxo-guanine problem. Cell Cycle, 2012; 11(6): 1070-1075.
https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.11.6.19448
PMid:22370481

32. Miller H., Prasad R., Wilson S.H. et al. 8-oxodGTP incorporation by DNA polymerase β is modified by active-site residue Asn279. Biochemistry, 2000; 39: 1029-1033.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi991789x
PMid:10653647

33. Nakabeppu Y., Sakumi K., Sakamoto K. et al. Mutagenesis and carcinogenesis caused by the oxidation of nucleic acids. Biol. Chem, 2006; 387(4): 373-379.
https://doi.org/10.1515/BC.2006.050
PMid:16606334

34. O'Boyle N.M., Banck M., James C.A. et al. Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminform, 2011; 3: 33
https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-3-33
PMid:21982300 PMCid:PMC3198950

35. Pronk S., Páll S., Schulz R. et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics, 2013; 29(7): 845-854.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055
PMid:23407358 PMCid:PMC3605599

36. Schlitter J. Estimation of absolute and relative entropies of macromolecules using the covariance matrix. Chem. Phys. Letters, 1993; 215(6): 617-621.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(93)89366-P

37. Shimizu M., Gruz P., Kamiya H., Kim S.R., Pisani F.M., Masutani C., Kanke Y., Harashima H., Hanaoka F., Nohmi T. Erroneous incorporation of oxidized DNA precursors by Y-family DNA polymerases. EMBO Rep, 2003; 4: 269-273.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.embor765
PMid:12634844 PMCid:PMC1315893

38. Shimizu M., Gruz P., Kamiya H. et al. Efficient and erroneous incorporation of oxidized DNA precursors by human DNA polymerase η. Biochemistry, 2007; 46: 5515-5522.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi062238r
PMid:17439242

39. Van der Spoel D., Lindahl E., Hess B. et al. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem, 2005; 26: 1701-1718.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20291
PMid:16211538

40. Wang J., Bruschweiler R. J. Chem. Theory Comput, 2006; 2(1): 18-24.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ct050118b
PMid:26626374

41. Van Loon B., Markkanen E., Hübscher U. Oxygen as a friend and enemy: How to combat the mutational potential of 8-oxo-guanine. DNA Repair (Amst), 2010; 9(6): 604-616.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.03.004
PMid:20399712

42. Zhao Y., Truhlar D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functional. Theor. Chem. Acc, 2008; 120: 215-241.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x

43. Zoete V., Cuendet M.A., Grosdidier A., Michielin O. SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J. Comput. Chem, 2011; 32(11): 2359-2368.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21816
PMid:21541964


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Studia biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.