TOPICAL RELATIONSHIPS OF COMMON BUZZARD BUTEO BUTEO L. (AVES: FALCONIFORMES) IN RIVNE NATURE RESERVE, SHATSK NATIONAL NATURE PARK AND SURROUNDING AREAS

I. V. Komarnytskyy, M. V. Franchuk


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0901.416

Abstract


In the paper some parameters of topical relationships of Common buzzard (Buteo buteo L.) in Rivne Nature Reserve and Shatsk National Park (Western Polissya) were discussed. On the study area Buzzards usually choose pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) and black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaerth.) as a nesting trees in proportion to their abundance in the environment. In case of aspen (Populus tremula L.) and Jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) Buzzards show some selectivity. Dimensions of nesting trees are in average larger than the neighboring trees (Z = 5.18, p<0.001). The height of nests location on a tree correlates positively with the height of nesting trees (r = 0.73, p<0.05). The majority of nests on the studied sites are located on a side branches (71%), less in a fork of main trunk (29 %). The nests are oriented mainly northwest (28 %) and west (19 %) directions. 30 % of nests are located at a trunk bend. As distance from the nests increases, average forest cover of nesting territory decreases from 74 % in areas within 500 m radius to 49 % in areas within 2000 m radius. Distances from buzzards’ nests to nearest settlements and shortest distance to roads in Shatsk NP and Rivne Reserve are significantly different. Average breeding productivity was 2.2 chicks per nesting pair. Significant correlations between the breeding productivity and distance from nest location to forest margin, roads, settlements, and to nearest neighbo­ring buzzard nests were not found.


Keywords


Buteo buteo, topical relationships, breeding

References


1. Austin G.E., Thomas C.J., Houston D.C., Predicting the spatial distribution of buzzard Buteo buteo nesting areas using a Geographical Information System and remote sensing. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996; 33: 1541-1550.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2404792

2. Bielański W. Nesting preferences of common buzzard Buteo buteo and goshawk Accipiter gentilis in forest stands of different structure (Niepolomice Forest, Southern Poland). Biologia, Bratislava, 2006; 61(5): 597-603.
https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0096-7

3. Bustamante J., Seoane J. Predicting the distribution of four species of raptors (Aves: Accipitridae) in southern Spain: statistical models work better than existing maps. Journal of Biogeography, 2004; 31: 295-306.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.01006.x

4. Butet A., Michel N., Rantier Y. et al. Responses of common buzzard (Buteo buteo) and Eurasian kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) to land use changes in agricultural landscapes of Western France. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2010; 138: 152-159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.04.011

5. Byholm P., Nikula A., Kentta J. et al. Interactions between habitat heterogeneity and food affect reproductive output in a top predator. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2007; 76: 392-401.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01211.x
PMid:17302847

6. Chymyn M. Current status of Falconiformes of the Volyn Polissia // Nature of Western Polissia and surrounding Areas. Lutsk, 2005; Vezha. 217-235. (In Ukrainian)

7. Chymyn M. The results of inventory of vertebrate fauna of the Nature Reserve "Rivnenskyi" // Nature of Western Polissia and surrounding Areas". Lutsk, 2005; Vezha: 250-276. (In Ukrainian)

8. Congedo L., Munafo M. Development of a Methodology for Land Cover Classification in Dar es Salaam using Landsat Imagery. 2013, Rome: Sapienza University.

9. Domashevsky S.V. Materials on ecology of buzzards in northern Ukraine. Berkut, 2004; 13(2): 230-243. (In Russian)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02073.x

10. Donner D., Anderson D., Eklund D. et al. Large-Scale Forest Composition Influences Northern Goshawk Nesting in Wisconsin. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 2013; 77(3): 495-504.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.485

11. Galushin V. M. Adaptive strategies of birds of prey. Abstracts of Thesis. Moscow: 2005. 49 p. (In Russian)

12. Galushin V. M. The Birds of Prey of Forest. Biographies. Problem. Solutions. M.: Publishing House "Lesnaya Promyshlennost", 1980. 160 p. (In Russian)

13. Global Visualization Viewer. U.S. Geological Survey <http://glovis.usgs.gov>

14. Havryluk М.Н. Methodical recommendations to monitoring program of raptors in Ukraine. Cherkasy, 2009. 20 p. (In Ukrainian)

15. Hrom М. М. Forest taxation. Handbook. 2nd ed. Lviv: UNFU, 2007. 416 p. (In Ukrainian)

16. Jung M. LecoS - A QGIS plugin for automated landscape ecology analysis. PeerJ PrePrints, 2013 1:e116v1. <https://peerj.com/preprints/116v1/>
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.116v2

17. Lõhums A. Nest-tree and nest-stand characteristics of forest-dwelling raptors in east-central Estonia: implications for forest management and conservation. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Biology and Ecology, 2006; 55: 31-50.

18. Nature of Rivne region. E. K.I. Hеrenchuk. Lviv: Vyscha Shkola, 1976. 156 p. (In Ukrainian)

19. Nature of Volyn region. Ed. K.I. Hеrenchuk. Lviv: Vyscha Shkola, 1975. 147 p. (In Ukrainian)

20. Nature Reserve Fund of Rivne region. Ed. I. M. Hruschenko. Rivne: Volynski Obe¬rehy, 2008. 216 p. (In Ukrainian)

21. Novikova L.M. Locations of Goshawk Habitats in Vegetation Areas of Kerzhenskiy State Nature Reserve, Russia. Raptors Conservation, 2008; 14: 96-107. (In Russian)

22. Novikova L.M. Number and Distribution of the Common Buzzard in the Kerzhenskiy State Nature Reserve, Russia. Raptors Conservation, 2009; 16: 139-150. (In Russian)

23. Prushynskyy M.S., Shydlovskyy I.V. To Common Buzzard span in Western Ukraine. Materials of 2 Conference of YOUU (4-7 April 1996, Kaniv). Chernivtsi, 1996, 151-154. (In Ukrainian)

24. Redinov K.O. Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo) in Mykolaiv region. Branta, 2009; 12: 70-80. (In Russian)

25. Romanov M.S. Topical relationships of forest birds of prey in the mosaic of vegetation: Ph. D. thesis (03.00.16 - ecology) Moskov: MSPU, 2001. 225 p. (In Russian)

26. Reliable prognosis <http://rp5.ua/>

27. Shydlovskyy I.V. Characteristics of species of the order Falconiformes of the Shatsk National Nature Park // Condition and biodiversity of ecosystems of Shatsky National Nature Park. Materials of scientific conference (Ivan Franko National University of Lviv and Shatsky NNP, 16-18 September 2005, Shatsk). Lviv: Spolom, 2005, 72-74. (In Ukrainian)

28. Siders M.S., Kennedy P.L. Forest structural characteristics of Accipiter nesting habitat: is there an allometric relationships? Condor, 1996; 98: 123-132.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1369515

29. Sim I.M.W., Cross A.V., Lamacraft D.L. at al. Correlates of Common Buzzard Buteo buteo density and breeding success in the West Midlands. Bird Study, 2001; 48(3): 317-329.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650109461231

30. Steiniger S., Hay G.J. Free and open source geographic information tools for landscape ecology. Ecological Informatics, 2009; 4(4): 183-195.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2009.07.004

31. Zhuravchak R.O., Franchuk M.V. Ornithofauna of Ramsar site "Perebrody Peatlands" // Nature of Polissia: research and conservation. Materials of international scientific-practical conference, dedicated to the 15th anniversary of the Nature Reserve "Rivnenskyi" and the 10th anniversary of the Ramsar site "Perebrody Peatlands" (Sarny, 3-5 July 2014) / Edited by. R.O. Zhuravchak/ Rivne, OJSC "Rivnenska Drukarnia", 2014. 680 p. (In Ukrainian)

32. Zubarovskyy V.M. Fauna of Ukraine. V. Birds. Birds of Prey. Kyiv: Nauk. Dumka.1977. 332 p. (In Ukrainian)

33. Zuberogoitia I., Martínez J.E., Martínez J.A. et al. Influence of management practices on nest site habitat selection, breeding and diet of the Common Buzzard Buteo buteo in two different areas of Spain. Ardeola, 2006; 53(1): 83-98.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Studia biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.