THE ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL NESTING BOXES AND BIRDS’ NESTS IN MAINTAINING VITAL ACTIVITY OF THE VESPIDAE AND APIDAE FAMILIES

O. O. Yarys, A. B. Chaplygina


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1601.675

Abstract


Background. During 2019‒2021, from the first decade of March to the third decade of July on the territory of northeastern Ukraine, ornithological studies on hollow-nesting birds populating  artificial nestings were carried out. It is common knowledge, that in urban landscapes, the presence of wildlife is limited. Among the many different measures aimed at increasing the number of different groups of animals in urbanized areas, artificial nesting is the main solution for the reproduction and conservation of the population. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate the role of artificial nesting in maintaining vital activitiy of the families Vespidae and Apidae.
Methods. When checking and examining artificial nestings, 80 nests were found 69 of which were populated by representatives of the family Vespidae and 11 – by Apidae. For identification of nests and establishing the taxonomic status of representatives of the Vespidae and Apidae families in artificial nestings, keys were used.
Results. In the territory of northeastern Ukraine, studies have been carried out in recreational areas: Homilsha Woods National Nature Park near Zadonetske and Gaidary villages (Kharkiv Region), Hetman National Nature Park near Klementove and Kamyanka villages, as well as in “Vakalivshchyna” tract near Vakalivshchyna village (Sumy Region). Among representatives of the Vespidae family in artificial nestings on the territory of northeastern Ukraine, two species ‒ Vespa crabro and Vespula vulgaris were identified; among the family Apidae – one representative species ‒ Bombus terrestris.
Conclusions. Representatives of the families Vespidae and Apidae begin to populate artificial nestings from the third decade of April till the second decade of July (21.04‒10.07). On the studied territories of northeastern Ukraine, in Hetman National Nature Park near Kamyanka village, the number of nestings by V. vulgaris was maximal throughout all the years of study, besides, the number of individuals increased over the period. During inspections of the artificial nestings on the territory of the regional landscape park “Feldman Ecopark”, nestings of representatives of the Vespidae and Apidae families were found.


Keywords


common wasp, common hornet, European bumblebee, artificial nesting boxes, hollow-nesting birds, northeastern Ukraine

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blüthgen, P. (1961). Die Faltenwespen Mitteleuropas (Hymenoptera, Diploptera) [The wasps of Central Europe (Hymenoptera, Diploptera)]. Akademie-Verlag. Berlin. doi: 10.1515/9783112537084 (In Deutsch)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bogolyubov, A. S. (2001). Izuchenie lesnykh bespozvonochnykh (2 chast: travianoi iarus, krony, vozdushnaia sreda) [Study of forest invertebrates. (Part 2: grass layer, crowns, air environment)]. Ecological Field Studies Instructive Manuals. M., 12. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Chaplygina, A. B., Bondarets, D. I., & Savinskaya, N. O. (2014). Monitorynh zaselenosti shtuchnykh hnizdivel duplohnizdnykamy na terytorii NPP "Homilshanski lisy" [Monitoring population of artificial nesting sites hollow-nesting birds on the territory NNP "Gomolsha Forest"]. Journal of Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University (Biological sciences), 8(291), Part I, 56-62. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

Detoni, M., Feás, X., Jeanne, R. L., Loope, K. J., O'Donnell, S., Santoro, D., Sumner, S., & Jandt J. M. (2021). Evolutionary and ecological pressures shaping social wasps collective defenses. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 114(5), 581-595. doi:10.1093/aesa/saaa063
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Dvořák, L., & Straka, J. (2007). Vespoidea: Vespidae (vosovití) [Vespoidea: Vespidae (wasps)]. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 11, 171-189. (In Czech)
Google Scholar

Ertürk, Ö., & Sarıkaya, A. (2020). Determination of some structural features of the nest paper materials of Vespa crabro germana Christ, 1791 (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in Turkey. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 93(1), 1-13. doi:10.2317/0022-8567-93.1.1
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Haeseler, V. (1988). A nest of Paravespula vulgaris (L.) (Hym., Vespidae) in a juniper-tree. Journal of Applied Entomology, 105(1-5), 14-18. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1988.tb00155.x
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Honchar, H., Kumpanenko, A, & Koniakin, S. (2020). Vykorystannia shtuchnykh hnizdovykh konstruktsii dlia peretynchastokrylykh komakh (Hymenoptera, Aculeata) u misti [Using artificial nesting structures for hymenopteran insects (Hymenoptera, Aculeata) in the city]. Environmental sciences, 5(32), 82-90. doi:10.32846/2306-9716/2020.eco.5-32.12 (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Medvedev, G. S. (ed.) (1978). Opredelitel nasekomykh Evropeiskoi chasti SSSR [Keys to the insects of the European part of the USSR. Hymenoptera]. Part ІІ, Nauka, 3, 584. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Kremen, C., Williams, N. M., Aizen, M. A., Gemmill-Herren, B., LeBuhn, G., Minckley, R., Packer, L., Potts, S. G., Roulston, T., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Vázquez, D. P., Winfree, R., Adams, L., Crone, E. E., Greenleaf, S. S., Keitt, T. H., Klein, A. M., Regetz, J., & Ricketts, T. H. (2007). Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecology Letters, 10(4), 299-314. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Lester, P. J., & Beggs, J. R. (2019). Invasion success and management strategies for social Vespula wasps. Annual Review of Entomology, 64(1), 51-71. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-111812
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Lezhenina, I. P., Gramma, V. N., Chaplygina, A. B., & Savinskaya, N. A. (2009). Chlenystonohye v hnezdakh mukholovky-belosheiky v nahornoi dubrave (Kharkovskaia oblast) [Arthropoda in nests of Muscicapa albicollis in highland oak-grove (Kharkov region)]. Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Natural Sciences, 3(58), 95-100. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Michener, Ch. D. (2007). The Bees of the World. Baltimore, London: John Hopkins University Press. Second edition, 953.
Google Scholar

Olsson, O., Bolin, A., Smith, H. G., & Lonsdorf, E. V. (2015). Modeling pollinating bee visitation rates in heterogeneous landscapes from foraging theory. Ecological Modelling, 316, 133-143. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.009
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Rahimi, E., Barghjelveh, S., & Dong, P. (2021). Using the Lonsdorf model for estimating habitat loss and fragmentation effects on pollination service. Ecological Processes, 10(1). doi:10.1186/s13717-021-00291-8
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Shapoval, A. P. (2019). Ispolzovanie iskusstvennyih gnezdoviy dlya ptits drugimi zhivotnyimi na Kurshskoy kose. [Use of artificial nests for birds by other animals on the Curonian Spit]. Russian Ornithological Journal, 28(1746), 1294-1297. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Tarantovich, M. V. (2012). Gnezdovaia biologiia sizovoronki (Coracias garrulus) v Belarusi [Nesting biology of the European roller (Coracias garrulus) in Belarus]. Materials of the Republican Scientific and Practical Conference (Grodno, March 2-4, 2012). Grodno: GRSMU, 149-152. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Vaudo, A. D., Ellis, J. D., Cambray, G. A., & Hill, M. (2011). The effects of land use on honey bee (Apis mellifera) population density and colony strength parameters in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Journal of Insect Conservation, 16(4), 601-611. doi:10.1007/s10841-011-9445-0
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Williams, I. H., Corbet, S. A., & Osborne, J. L. (1991). Beekeeping, wild bees and pollination in the European Community. Bee World, 72(4), 170-180. doi:10.1080/0005772x.1991.11099101
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Yarys, O., Chaplygina, A., & Kratenko, R. (2021). Breeding phenology of Common Redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) and its reproduction biology with artificial nests in Northeastern Ukraine. Ornis Hungarica, 29(2), 122-138. doi:10.2478/orhu-2021-0024
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Yarys, О. О. (2021). Fenologіya ta bіologіya rozmnozhennya Ficedula albicollis (Temminck) u shtuchnih gnіzdіvlyah na teritorії regіonal'nogo landshaftnogo parku "Fel’dman Ekopark" [Phenology and biology of Ficedula albicollis (Temminck) reproduction in artificial nests on tne territory of regional landscape park Feldman Ecopark]. Biodiversity, ecology and experimental biology, 1(23), 42-51. doi:10.34142/2708-5848.2021.23.1.06 (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Yuzyk, D. І., & Chaplygina, А. B. (2016). Synytsia blakytna (Parus caeruleus L.) v systemi konsortsii v umovakh lisovykh tsenoziv Pivnichno-Skhidnoi Ukrainy [Blue tit (Parus caeruleus L.) in the system of consortia in the minds of forest cenoses in North-Eastern Ukraine]. III International Scientific and Practical Conference "Regional aspects of floristic and faunal studies" (May 13-14, smt. Putila, Chernivtsi, Ukraine), 83-87. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 O. O. Yarys, A. B. Chaplygina

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.