ANALYTICAL DESCRIPTION OF GENETIC CONTROLLING SYSTEMS IN CELLS IN OF PROLIFERATION AND DIFFERENTIATION STATES
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0901.408
Abstract
Paper presents kinetic models of changes in genetic controlling systems of cells in the states of cell proliferation and differentiation. It was shown that the changes in the genetic control of cells in the state of proliferation and differentiation occur at the maximal rate of reactions constants. It was built on response surfaces for each of the reaction rate constants showing what parameters of the model make the largest contribution to the value of each of them. It was established that the greatest contribution to the rate of reaction constants of changes in the genetic controlling systems of cells in the state of proliferation have histone genes and cyclin-dependent kinases, and a little less – genes-stimulators of proliferation and transcription factors. In cells in differentiation a state of inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases, and equally transcription factors, cell cycle genes, transcription proteins genes, structural genes and hyperpolarization of the cell membrane. As a result, we got data that the value concentration of cyclin-dependent kinases and inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases in the cell is the trigger that determines whether a cell proliferates or differentiates. Also, it was set specific numerical value of each of the reactions rate constants which characterize changes in the genetic control of cell in the state of proliferation and differentiation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Allen R.E. Hepatocyte growth factor activates quiescent skeletal muscle satellite cells in vitro. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 1995; 165: 307-312. | |
| |
2. Binggeli R. Membrane potentials and sodium channels: Hypotheses for growth regulation and cancer formation based on changes in sodium channels and gap junctions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1986; 123: 377-401. | |
| |
3. Canalis E. Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Their Antagonists, and the Skeleton. Endocr. Rev, 2003; 24: 218-235. | |
| |
4. Cone C.D. Unified theory on the basic mechanism of normal mitotic control and oncogenesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1971; 30: 151-181. | |
| |
5. Csete M.E. Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science, 2002; 295: 1664-1665. | |
| |
6. De Jong H. Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. Journal of Сomputational Biology, 2002; 9: 67-103. | |
| |
7. Floss T. A role for FGF-6 in skeletal muscle regeneration. Genes Dev, 1997; 11: 2040-2051. | |
| |
8. Füchtbauer E.M. MyoD and myogenin are coexpressed in regenerating skeletal muscle of the mouse. Developmental Dynamics: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 1992; 193: 34-39. | |
| |
9. Grounds M.D. Identification of skeletal muscle precursor cells in vivo by use of MyoD1 and myogenin probes. Cell and Tissue Research, 1992; 267: 99-104. | |
| |
10. Ho L. An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is essential for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009; 106: 5181-5186. | |
| |
11. Ingalls B. Mathematical modelling in systems biology. Applied Mathematics, 2012. 312 p. | |
| |
12. Kai X. Identification of proliferation/differentiation switch in the cellular network of multicellular organisms. Plos Computational Biology, 2006; 4: 124-148. | |
| |
13. Kastner S. Gene Expression Patterns of the Fibroblast Growth Factors and Their Receptors During Myogenesis of Rat Satellite Cells. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 2000; 48: 1079-1096. | |
| |
14. Lee D.K. Androgen receptor enhances myogenin expression and accelerates differentiation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2002; 294: 408-413. | |
| |
15. Minoo P. Loss of Proliferative Potential during Terminal Differentiation Coincides with the Decreased Abundance of a Subset of Heterogeneous Ribonuclear Proteins. J. Cell Biol, 1989; 109: 1937-1946. | |
| |
16. Mykshyna V. S. Mathematical models in health reservation. Mathematical Modeling, 2009; 21: 111-121 (In Russian) | |
| |
17. Putney L.K. Na-H Exchange-dependent Increase in Intracellular pH Times G2/M Entry and Transition. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2003; 278: 44645-44649. | |
| |
18. Rubin A.B. Kinetics of biological processes. Soross Educational Journal, 1998; 10: 84-91. (In Russian) | |
| |
19. Samsonova M. NetWork: An interactive interface to the tools for analysis of genetic network structure and dynamics. Proc. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. (PSB'99), 1999; 4: 102-111. | |
| |
20. Seale P. Pax7 is required for the specification of myogenic satellite cells. Cell, 2000; 102: 777-786. | |
| |
21. Sheehan S.M. Skeletal muscle satellite cell proliferation in response to members of the fibroblast growth factor family and hepatocyte growth factor. J. Cell Physiol, 1999; 181: 499-506. | |
| |
22. Shidlovskiy N.P. Theorey and methodology development of a system mobiled pharmacy - complexed. Alphabitmedical, 2005; 8: 24-26. | |
| |
23. Stein L.J. Control of cell cycle regulated histone genes during proliferation and differentiation. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord, 1996; 3: 84-90. | |
| |
24. Sundelacruz S. Membrane Potential Controls Adipogenic and Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells. PLoS ONE, 2008; 3: 325-342. | |
| |
25. Sundelacruz S. Role of Membrane Potential in Regulation of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation. Stem. Cell Rev. and Rep, 2009; 5: 231-246. | |
| |
26. Tatsumi R. HGF/SF Is Present in Normal Adult Skeletal Muscle and Is Capable of Activating Satellite Cells. Developmental Biology, 1998; 194: 114-128. | |
| |
27. Tatsumi R. Release of Hepatocyte Growth Factor from Mechanically Stretched Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells and Role of pH and Nitric Oxide. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2002; 13: 2909-2918. | |
| |
28. Yablonka-Reuveni Z. Fibroblast Growth Factor Promotes Recruitment of Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells in Young and Old Rats. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 1999; 47: 23-42. | |
| |
29. Yablonka-Reuveni Z. Temporal expression of regulatory and structural muscle proteins during myogenesis of satellite cells on isolated adult rat fibers. Developmental Biology, 1994; 164: 588-603. | |
| |
30. Zammit P.S. Muscle satellite cells adopt divergent fates: a mechanism for self-renewal. The Journal of Cell Biology, 2004; 166: 347-357. | |
| |
31. Zavitz K. Controlling cell proliferation in differentiating tissues: genetic analysis of negative regulators of Gl-S-phase progression. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 1997; 9: 773-781. | |
| |
32. Zien A. Analysis of gene expression data with pathway scores. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. (ISMB 2000), 2000; 8: 407-417. | |
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Studia biologica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.