METHODS OF AMPHIBIAN TRACKING

V. Strus, Iu. Strus


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1404.639

Abstract


Introduction: In this article, we present a literature review of modern, most common, and useful methods of amphibian tracking. Amphibians are the most sensitive group of animals and near 41 % of species are under the risk of extinction. Therefore, the research of spatial movements of amphibians is one of the most topical tasks of modern herpeto­logy. The information about the use of space is needed for practical protection of sensitive species of amphibians, for planning of protected areas, estimation of the potential danger for some groups of animals when designing infrastructure objects, such as roads. The movement studies gained popularity and have been undertaken since the second part of the 20th century. Such growth in the number of studies is related to the recent advances in radio-electronic technology that contributed to the creation of a range of instruments for automatic or semi-automatic tracking of individual animals. Unfortunately, most of such methods are still too expensive for scientists from developing countries. Thus, classical methods are still widely used.
Results: We describe six methods of amphibians tracking: radioisotope tracking, automated radio telemetry, harmonic direction finding, radio frequency identification, fluorescent powder, spool tracking. Each of these methods allows collecting detailed information about spatial movements of individuals. Many of these tracking methods require using of a special tag, which is attached to an animal and used for its further detection. Different types of tags have identical functions but are based on different principles of use. Two of the described methods do not require using of tags and are cheap. These are fluorescent powder and spool tracking. In the article, we provide many links to grant programs and places where special equipment can be found.
Conclusions: As a result of literature review, we created a table with concise information about all the described methods. Using this table one can choose the best method for an experiment.


Keywords


amphibians, radiotelemetry, fluorescent powder, radioisotope tracking, spool tracking

References


1. Atkinson-Adams M.R., Price C.J., Scrimgeour G.J., Paszkowski C.A. Long-toed Salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum) hibernacula in Waterton Lakes National Park revealed using Passive Integrated Transponder telemetry. The Canadian Field-Naturalist, 2018; 132(2): 168-175.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

2. Birchfield G., Deters J. Movement paths of displaced northern green frogs (Rana clamitans melanota). Southeastern Naturalist, 2005; 4: 63-76.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

3. Borzée A., Kim J.Y., da Cunha M.A.M., Lee D., Sin E., Oh S., Yi Y., Jang Y. Temporal and spatial differentiation in microhabitat use: Implications for reproductive isolation and ecological niche specification. Integrative Zoology, 2016; 11: 375-87.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

4. Borzée A., Kim Y.I., Kim K., Jang Y. Methodological development for harmonic direction finder tracking in salamanders. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 2018; 13(2): 473-478.
Google Scholar

5. Borzée A., Choi Y., Kim Y.E., Jablonski P.G., Jang Y. Interspecific variation in seasonal migration and brumation behavior in two closely related species of treefrogs. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2019; 7: 55.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

6. Breckenridge W.J., John R.T. Growth, local movements and hibernation of the manitoba toad, Bufo hemiophrys. Ecology, 1961; 42(4): 637-646.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

7. Breed M.D., Moore J. Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior. 3th Ed. In: Pinter-Wollman N., Mabry K.E. (Ed.) Remote-Sensing of Behavior. Oxford: Academic Press, 2010. Р. 33-40.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

8. Buhlmann K.A., Tuberville T.D. Use of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags for marking small freshwater turtles. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 1998; 3(1): 102-104.
Google Scholar

9. Carver A.V., Burger Jr.L.W., Brennan L.A. Passive integrated transponders and patagial tag markers for northern bobwhite chicks. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 1999; 63(1): 162-166.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

10. Charney N., Letcherd B., Haro A., Warren P. Terrestrial passive integrated transponder antennae for tracking small animal movements. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2009; 73: 1245-1250.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

11. Connette G.M., Semlitsch R.D. Successful use of a passive integrated transponder (PIT) system for below-ground detection of plethodontid salamanders. Wildlife Research, 2012; 39(1): 1-6.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

12. Dodd C.K. Jr. Amphibian ecology and conservation. A handbook of techniques. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 2009. 556 p.
Google Scholar

13. Dole J.W. Summer movements of adult Leopard Frogs, Rana pipiens (Schreber), in northern Michigan. Ecology, 1965; 46: 236-255.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

14. Eggert C. Use of fluorescent pigments and implantable transmitters to track a fossorial toad (Pelobates fuscus). Herpetological Journal, 2002; 12: 69-74.
Google Scholar

15. Fellers G.M., Drost C.A. Fluorescent powder: A method for tracking reptiles. Herpetological Review, 1989; 20: 91-92.
Google Scholar

16. Fischer M., Ringler M., Ringler E., Pašukonis A. Reproductive behavior drives female space use in a sedentary Neotropical frog. PeerJ, 2020; 8: e8920.
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

17. Gerrard M. Tagging of small animals with radioisotopes for tracking purposes: a literature review. International Journal of Apphed Radiation and Isotopes, 1969; 20: 671-676.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

18. Gibbons J.W., Andrews K.M. PIT tagging: simple technology at its best. BioScience, 2004; 54(5): 447-454.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

19. Gourevitch E.H.Z., Downie J.R. Evaluation of tree frog tracking methods using Phyllomedusa trinitatis (Anura: Phyllomedusidae). Phyllomedusa: Journal of Herpetology, 2018; 17(2): 233-246.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

20. Gourret A., Alford R., Schwarzkopf L. Very small, light dipole harmonic tags for tracking small animals. Herpetological Review, 2011; 42(4): 522-525.
Google Scholar

21. Hammond T.T., Curtis M.J., Jacobs L.E., Tobler M.W., Swaisgood R.R., Shier D.M. Behavior and detection method influence detection probability of a translocated, endangered amphibian. Animal Conservation, 2020.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

22. Heyer W.R., Donnelly M.A., McDiarmid R.W., Hayek L.A.C., Foster M.S. In Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. In: Ashton R.E. Jr. (Ed.) Tracking with radioactive tags. Smithsonian Institution Press, 1994: 158-163.

23. Jehle R., Hödl W. PITs versus patterns: effects of transponders on recapture rate and body condition of Danube crested newts (Triturus dobrogicus) and common spadefoot toads (Pelobates fuscus). Herpetological Journal, 1998; 8: 181-186.
Google Scholar

24. Jehle R., Arntzen J.W. Post-breeding migrations of newts (Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus) with contrasting ecological requirements. Journal of Zoology, London, 2000; 251: 297-396.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

25. Karlstrom E.L. The Use of Co60 as a tag for recovering amphibians in the field. Ecology, 1957; 38(2): 188-195.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

26. Kays R., Tilak S., Crofoot M., Fountain T., Obando D., Ortega A., Kuemmeth F., Mandel J., Swenson G., Lambert T., Hirsch B., Wikelski M. Tracking animal location and activity with an automated radio telemetry system in a tropical rainforest. The Computer Journal, 2011; 54(12): 1931-1948.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

27. Lamb J.Y., Davis M.P. Salamanders and other amphibians are aglow with biofluorescence. Scientific Reports, 2020; 10: 2821.
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

28. Langkilde T., Alford R.A. The tail wags the frog: Harmonic radar transponders affect movement behavior in Litoria lesueuri. Journal of Herpetology, 2002; 36(4): 711-715.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

29. Leskovar C., Sinsch U. Harmonic direction finding: a novel tool to monitor the dispersal of small-sized anurans. The Herpetological Journal, 2005; 15: 173-180.
Google Scholar

30. Madison D.M., Shoop C.R. Homing behavior, orientation, and home range of salamanders tagged with tantalum-182. Science, 1970; 168(3938): 1484-1487.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

31. Madison D. M., Farrand L. Habitat use during breeding and emigration in radio-implanted tiger salamanders, Ambystoma tigrinum. Copeia, 1998; 1998(2): 402-410.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

32. Mascanzoni D., Wallin H. The harmonic radar: a new method of tracing insects in the field. Ecological Entomology, 1986; 11(4): 387-390.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

33. Matos C., Petrovan S.O., Wheeler P.M., Ward A.I. Short-term movements and behaviour govern the use of road mitigation measures by a protected amphibian. Animal Conservation, 2019; 22(3): 285-296.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

34. McAllister K.R., Watson J., Risenhoover K., McBride T. Marking and radiotelemetry of Oregon spotted frogs (Rana pretiosa). Northwestern Naturalist, 2004; 85(1): 20-25.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

35. McDiarmid R.W., Foster M.S., Guyer C., Gibbons J.W., Chernoff N. Raptile biodiversity: Standard methods for inventory and monitoring. London: University of Callifornia Press, 2012. 424 p.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

36. Mellor D.J., Beausoleil N.J., Stafford K.J. Marking amphibians, reptiles and marine mammals: animal welfare, practicalities and public perceptions in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation, 2004. 55 p.
Google Scholar

37. Miles M.A. A simple method of tracking mammals and locating triatomine vectors of Trypanosoma cruzi in Amazonian forest. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1976; 25(5): 671-674.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

38. Miles M.A. Mammal tracking and nest location in Brazilian forest with an improved spool-and-line device. Journal of Zoology, 1981; 195(3): 331-347.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

39. Mullican T.R. Radio telemetry and fluorescent pigments: a comparison of techniques. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 1988; 52(4): 627-631.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
40. Naef-Daenzer B. Früh D., Stalder M., Welti P., Weise E. Miniaturisation (0.2 g) and evaluation of attachment techniques of telemetry transmitters. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2005; 208: 4063-4068.
CrossrefPubMed ● PMC ● Google Scholar

41. Okamiya H., Kusano T. Evaluating movement patterns and microhabitat selection of the japanese common toad (Bufo japonicus formosus) using fluorescent powder tracking. Zoological Science, 2018 35(2): 153-160.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

42. Orlofske S.A., Grayson K.L., Hopkins W.A. The Effects of fluorescent tracking powder on oxygen consumption in salamanders using either cutaneous or bimodal respiration. Copeia, 2009; 2009(3): 623-627.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

43. Ousterhout B.H,. Burkhart J.J. Moving beyond the plane: measuring 3D home ranges of juvenile salamanders with passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2017; 71(59).
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

44. Pašukonis A., Warrington I., Ringler M., Hödl W. Poison frogs rely on experience to find the way home in the rainforest. Biology Letters, 2014; 10: 20140642.
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

45. Patt H., Swift M. Influence of temperature on the response of frogs to X irradiation. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 1948; 155(3): 388-393.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

46. Pellet J., Rechsteiner L., Skrivervik A.K., Zurcher J.F., Perrin N. Use of the harmonic direction finder to study the terrestrial habitats of the european tree frog (Hyla arborea). Amphibia-Reptilia, 2006; 27: 138-142.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

47. Pengilly D., Watson L.J. Automated detection of internally injected tags in red king crabs at crab processing facilities. Fisheries Research, 1994; 19: 93-300.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

48. Prentice E.F., Park D.L. (Ed.) A study to determine the biological feasibility of a new fish tagging system. Annual Report of Research. Seattle, Washington, 1983. 43 p.
Google Scholar

49. Ramírez P.A., Bell B.D., Germano J.M., Bishop P.J., Nelson N.J. Tracking a small cryptic amphibian with fluorescent powders. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 2017; 41(1): 134-138.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

50. Reshetylo O., Stakh V., Osiyeva A.-A., Dykyy I., Andriyishyn B., Panchuk M., Tsaryk I. Morta­lity of amphibians on the roads of Lviv province (Ukraine): trend for the last decade. Vestnik Zoologii, 2019; 53 (2): 131-140.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

51. Reshetylo O., Strus V., Andriishyn B. A field key for the identification of amphibians killed on the roads. Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, 2020. 42 p.

52. Riley J.R., Valeur P., Smith A.D., Reynolds D.R., Poppy G.M., Löfstedt C. Harmonic radar as a means of tracking the pheromone-following flight of male moths. Journal of Insect Beha­vior, 1998; 11: 287-296.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

53. Rittenhouse T.A.G., Altnethert. T. Fluorescent Powder pigments as a harmless tracking me­thod for ambystomatids and ranids. Herpetological Review, 2006; 37(2): 188-191.
Google Scholar

54. Roe A.W., Grayson K.L. Repeated exposure to fluorescent powder does not affectsurvival or mass in Eastern red-spotted newts, Notophthalmus viridescens. Applied Herpetology, 2009; 6(3): 295-299.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

55. Roznik E.A., Alford R.A. Seasonal ecology and behavior of an endangered rainforest frog (Litoria rheocola) threatened by disease. PLoS One, 2015; 10(5): e0127851.
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

56. Rowley J.J.L., Alford R.A. Techniques for tracking amphibians: The effects of tag attachment, and harmonic direction finding versus radio telemetry. Amphibia-Reptilia, 2007; 28(3): 367-376.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

57. Schabetsberger R., Jehle R., Maletzky A., Pesta J., Sztatecsny M. Delineation of terrestrial reserves for amphibians: Post-breeding migrations of the Italian crested newt (Triturus c. carnifex) at high altitudes. Biological Conservation, 2004; 117: 95-104.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

58. Schooley R.L., van Horne B., Burnham K.P. Passive integrated transponders for marking free-ranging townsend's ground squirrels. Journal of Mammalogy, 1993; 74(2): 480-484.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

59. Smyth B., Silke N. Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tags in the study of animal movement. Nature Education Knowledge, 2013; 4(3): 3.
Google Scholar

60. Stearner S.P. The effect of X irradiation on Rana pipiens (leopard frog), with special reference to survival and the response of the peripheral blood. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 1950; 115: 251-262.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

61. Stille W.T. The loss of jaw tags by toads. Chicago Nat. Hist. Mus., Nat. Hist. Misc., 1950; 74: 2 p.
Google Scholar

62. Sutherland D., Glen A., Cruz J. An alternative spool-and-line tracking device for medium-sized animals. Australian Mammalogy, 2008; 30: 89-90.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

63. Testud G., Vergnes A., Cordier P., Labarraque D., Miaud C. Automatic detection of small PIT-tagged animals using wildlife crossings. Animal Biotelemetry, 2019; 7: 21.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

64. Waddell E., Whitworth A., MacLeod R. A first test of the thread bobbin tracking technique as a method for studying the ecology of herpetofauna in a tropical rainforest. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 2016; 11: 61-71.
Google Scholar

65. Weber L., Šmejkal M., Bartoň D., Rulík M. Testing the applicability of tagging the Great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) using passive integrated transponders. PLoS One, 2019; 14(7): e0219069.
Crossref PubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

66. Windmiller B. Tracking techniques useful for field studies of anuran Google Scholar


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Studia Biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.