MODELING OF CHROMIUM EFFECT ON ECOPHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF SOIL–PLANT SYSTEM
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0902.425
Abstract
Ecophysiological parameters of soil–plant system under the effect of trivalent chromium and hexavalent chromium were studied using small artificial ecosystems ─ the microcosms. Emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) from soil and soil–plant system, morphometry and carbon concentration in shoots of Phaseolus vulgaris L. were determined. We established that effect of Cr(VI) decreased CO2 emission and increased NOx emission from soil microcosms and soil–plant microcosms. In turn, the effect of Cr(III) did not cause statistically significant changes on the emission of investigated gases in microcosms models. An inverse relationship between CO2 and NOx emissions was found by the correlation analysis. The emission intensity of investigated gases from soil without plants was higher than that from soil with plant cover. This fact stresses that the soil devoid of plant cover is an additional source of greenhouse gases emissions. Statistically significant changes effect in of Cr(VI) on morphometry and carbon concentration in the shoots of investigated plants was not found. In turn, Cr(III) decreased leaf growth in length and carbon concentration in shoots of P. vulgaris. Changes of investigated parameters showed that the problem of contamination of soil and groundwater with Cr(III) is important as pollution by Cr(VI).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Ahmad M., Ahmad S., Wahid A. et al. Ecophysiological responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to hexavalent chromium. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2011; 43(6): 2853-2859. | |
| |
2. Anderson A.I., Maye D.B., Maye F.K. Heavy metal toxicities: levels of nickel, cobalt and chromium in the soil plants associated with visual symptoms and variation in growth of an oat crop. Australian Journal of Agriculture Resistance, 1972; 24(4): 557-571. | |
| |
3. Bessonova V.P., Ivanchenko O.E. Chromium in the environment. Questions of Bioindication and Ecology, 2011; 16(1): 13-29. (In Russian) | |
| |
4. Bessonova V.P., Ivanchenko O.Y. Chromium accumulation in plants and its toxicity. Questions of Bioindication and Ecology, 2011; 16(2): 35-52. (In Ukranian) | |
| |
5. Boeckx P., Van Cleemput O. Estimates of N2O and CH4 fluxes from agricultural lands in various regions of Europe. Nutrient Cycles in Agroecosystems, 2001; 60: 35-47. | |
| |
6. Crow S. E., Wieder R. K. Sources of CO2 emission from a northern peatland: The role of root respiration, root exudates, and soil organic matter. Ecology, 2005; 86: 1825-1834. | |
| |
7. Glazovskaya M.A. The role and functions of the lithosphere in the Carbon cycle. Pedology, 1996; 10: 174-186. (In Russian) | |
| |
8. Glyanko A.K., Mitanova N.B., Stepanov A.V. The physiological role of nitric oxide (NO) in plant organisms. Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, 2009; 3(5): 33-52. (In Russian) | |
| |
9. Kasparov V.V. Methodological aspects of the research of gas exchange in the soil-atmosphere system. Moscow: Moscow State University, 1985. 48 p. (In Russian) | |
| |
10. Kudeyarov V.N. Nitrogen cycle and nitric oxide production. Pedology, 1999; 8: 988-998. (In Russian) | |
| |
11. Kudeyarov V.N., Kurganov I.N. Soil respiration of Russia: database analysis, long-term monitoring, general estimates. Pedology, 2005; 9: 1113-1121. (In Russian) | |
| |
12. Kurakov A.V., Evdokimov I.V., Popov A.I. Heterotrophic nitrification in soils. Pedology, 2001; 10: 1250-1260. (In Russian) | |
| |
13. Kurganova I.N. Emissions and the balance of carbon dioxide in terrestrial ecosystems. Moscow: Moscow State University, 2010. 50 p. (In Russian) | |
| |
14. Mineev V.G. Practical works on agrochemistry. Moscow: Moscow State University, 2001. 687 p. (In Russian) | |
| |
15. Rosswall T., Bolin B., Cook R. The nitrogen cycle. The major biogeochemical cycles and their interactions, 1983; 21: 46-50. | |
| |
16. Rudenko S.S., Kostyshyn S.S., Sitnikova I.O. Artificial systems in ecology. Chernivtsi: Ruta, 2006. 200 p. (In Ukranian) | |
| |
17. Rudenko S.S., Kostyshyn S.S., Morozova T.V. General ecology. Practical course. Chernivtsi: Ruta, 2003. Vol. 1. 320 p. (In Ukranian) | |
| |
18. Sauerbeck D. R. Plant, element and soils properties governing uptake and availability of heavy metals derived from sewage sludge. Water Air Soil Pollution, 1991; 57: 222-237. | |
| |
19. Sharkov I. N. Comparative characteristics two modifications of adsorbtion method for determining soil respiration. Pedology,1987; 10: 53-157. (In Russian) | |
| |
20. Singh A.K. Effect of trivalent and hexavalent chromium on spinach (Spinacea oleracea L.). Environmental Ecology, 2001; 19: 807-810. | |
| |
21. Smil V. Nitrogen in crop production: an account of global flows. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1999; 13: 647-662. | |
| |
22. Sologoub L.I., Antonyak G.L., Babich N.O. Chromium in organism of humans and animals. Biochemical, immunological and environmental aspects. Lviv: Yevrosvit, 2007. 128 p. (In Ukranian) | |
| |
23. Van Voris P., O'Neil R.V., Emanuil W. R., Shugart H.H. Functional complexcity and ecosystem stability. Ecology, 1980; 61: 1352-1360. | |
| |
24. Vernay P., Gauthier-Moussard G., Jean L. et al. Effect of chromium species on phytochemical and physiological parameters in Datura innoxia. Chemosphere, 2008; 72: 763-771. |
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Studia biologica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.