DOMINANT MICROBIAL ASSOCIATIONS OF ORAL CAVITY AT PERIODONTITIS AND FEATURES OF THEIR SENSITIVITY TO ANTIBACTERIAL DRUGS

M. V. Kryvtsova, Ye. Ya. Kostenko


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1401.613

Abstract


Opportunistic microorganisms play a significant role in the development of inflammatory diseases, including generalized periodontitis. The growing tendency towards the formation of antibiotic resistant microorganisms causes the relevance of monitoring the microorganisms’ sensitivity to antimicrobial drugs and the development of new approaches to the antimicrobial therapy. The purpose of this work was to determine the dominant microbial associations of the oral cavity in the conditions of generalized perio­dontitis, to study their sensitivity to antibiotics, antiseptics and phytopreparations. The mic­robial associations’ study at generalized periodontitis was performed by bacteriological monitoring of the pathological material from the foci of the inflammatory process. Determination of the isolates’ antibiotic susceptibility to antiseptics and phytopreparations was carried out by the disc diffusion method, in the agar. As test culture, the follo­wing bacteria and yeast from the American Type Culture Collection were used: Candida albicans ATCC 885-653; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923; Escherichia coli ATCC 25922; Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212; Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615; and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC ATCC 27853. We also used clinical strains of bacteria and yeasts (S. aureus, K. rhinoscleromatis, H. alvei, E. coli, S. pyogenes, S. pneumoniae, C. albicans, C. glabrata isolated from the oral cavities of patients suffering from the inflammatory periodontium. We selected clinical strains with multiple resistance to antibio­tics. The results of studies have shown that the opportunistic microorganisms dominated in 100 % of cases within the oral cavity microbiota in patients with generalized periodontitis. The most pronounced clinical symptoms of the disease and recurrent inflammation were observed with the persistence of the Staphylococcus genus bacteria association with the Enterobacteriaceae family bacteria and Pseudomonas bacteria genera, microscopic Candida genus fungi in the oral cavity. It was found that the fluoroquinolones and cefoperazone/sulbactam were the most effective against the isolates. Among the commercial preparations, Sangviritrin showed the most expressive antimicrobial activity and its antibacterial effect was registered on the clinical isolates of S. aureus. It is worth noting that the Sangviritrin showed the antimicrobial effect against an extra antibiotic-resistant isolates resistant to all phytopreparations and disinfectants used in the test. A high antimicrobial activity of Decasanum and Sangviritrin against the multi-antibiotic resistant strains, most by against Gram-positive bacteria, was established. The established regularities determine the relevance of the antibiotic therapy taking into account the antibiotic susceptibility of the inflammatory process pathogens and the development of a comprehensive approach for correction of the opportunistic microbiota at genera­lized periodontitis.


Keywords


antibiotic resistant isolates, opportunistic microorganisms, antibacterial activity, oral cavity microbiota

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Al Jehani Y.A. Risk factors of periodontal disease: review of the literature. International Journal of Dentistry, 2014; 1-9.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

2. Assaf A.М., Amro B.І., Mashallah S., Haddadin R.N. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory potential therapy for opportunistic microorganisms. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 2016; 10(05): 494-505.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

3. Balouiri M., Sadik M., Ibn Souda S.K. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2016; 6(2): 71-79.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

4. Cazzaniga A., Galli C., Fiorini A., Cantini E., Lodi G. Systemic antibiotics as adjunctive treatment for chronic periodontitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005; 1: Art. No.: CD005099.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

5. Faustova M.O. Sensitivity of dominant pathogens of infectious and inflammatory complications after dental implantation to antibiotics and antiseptics. Annals of Mechnikov Institute, 2017; 2: 68.

6. Fluit A., Schmitz F., Verhoef J. Multi-resistance to antimicrobial agents for the ten most frequently isolated bacterial pathogens. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2001; 18(2): 147-60.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

7. Jakobi M., Stumpp S., Stiesch M., Eberhard J., Heuer W. The Periimplant and periodontal microbiota in patients with and without clinical signs of inflammation. Dentistry Journal, 2015; 3(2): 24-42.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

8. Krisenko O.V., Sklyar T.V., Voronkova O.S., Sіrokvasha O.A., Shevchenko T.M. Features of microbial assotiation composition an antibioticresistence of oral cavity microflora. Microbiolo­gy & Biotechnology. 2014; 1(25): 35-44.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar
9. Kryvtsova M. V., Kostenko Ye. Ya., Salamon I. Compositions of essential oils with antimicrobial properties against isolates from oral cavities of patients with inflammatory diseases of parodentium. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 2018; 9(4): 491-4.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

10. Kryvtsova M.V., Trush K., Eftimova J., Koščová, J., Spivak M.J. Antimicrobial, antioxidant and some biochemical properties of Vaccinium vitis-idea L. Mikrobiolohichnyi Zhurnal, 2019; 3: 40-52.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

11 Liljemark W. F., Bloomquist C. Human oral microbial ecology and dental caries and periodontal diseases. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology Medicine, 2016; 2(7): 180-198.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

12. Mazur I., Stavska D., Gelashvili L. The usage of pharmaceutical drugs in dentistry. Sovremennaya Stomatologiya, 2016; 2: 24-27. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

13. Noiri Y., Ehara A., Kawahara T., Takemura N., Ebisu S. Participation of bacterial biofilms in refractory and chronic periapical periodontitis. Journal of Endodontics, 2002; 10 (28): 679-683.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

14. Pérez-Chaparro P. J, Gonçalves C., Figueiredo L.C., Faveri M., Lobão E., Tamashiro N., Duarte P., Feres M. Newly identified pathogens associated with periodontitis: a systematic review. J Dent Res, 2014; 93(9): 1-13.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

15. Ricucci D., Siqueira J. F. Jr. Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopathologic findings. Journal of Endodontics, 2010; 8 (36): 1277-1288.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

16. Salamon I., Kryvtsova M., Bucko D., Tarawneh Amer H. Chemical characterization and antimicrobial activity of some essential oils after their industrial large-scale distillation. The Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 2018; 8(3): 965-969.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

17. Schindel L. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Unexpected Reactions to Modern Therapeutics, 2013; 94-101.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

18. Tada A., Senpuku H., Motozawa Y., Yoshihara A., Hanada N., Tanzawa H. Association between commensal bacteria and opportunistic pathogens in the dental plaque of elderly individuals. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2006; 12(8): 776-781.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 M. V. Kryvtsova, Ye. Ya. Kostenko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.