ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF NATURAL SOAPS TESTED BY BIOSCREEN METHODOLOGY

B. Antonić, D. Dordević, S. Jančíková, I. Kushkevych


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1401.608

Abstract


The aim of this study was to combine the utilization of waste frying oils within soap making process in order to make useful and environmentally friendly solutions and development of methods for determination of the antimicrobial effect of those created products. Soaps were made from edible oils which are fried in laboratory conditions. The antimicrobial activity of soaps was done against Staphylococcus aureus species as one of the representatives of the human skin microbiome. Two methods were applied: agar dilution method and the method including kinetics following on Bioscreen micro­biology reader. In the first method, the number of CFU was followed on agar medium with and without different soap solutions after incubation for 24 hours at 30 °C. The result for IC50 (inhibition concentration for 50% of population) was 0.08 mg/mL. Minimal inhibition concentration was detected at 0.41 mg/mL and minimal bactericidal concentration was observed at > 0.75 mg/mL for selected soap solution. Soap concentrations of 0.3 mg/mL of soaps (made from fresh and fried oil) were used for Bioscreen assessment with measurement on every hour during the 7 hours of incubation at 30 °C. 5-second sequence of shaking of the microplate was applied before each measurement which was done at the wavelength of 610 nm. The growth coefficients of the culture with soap solutions added and from the growth of culture only were compared. The growth of S. aureus subjected to soaps made from fresh and fried oils was inhibited 55.3% and 69.7% respectively against the control during the first seven hours of incubation. From results obtained, it was concluded that there is a great potential of the Bioscreen as a method for further studies on antibacterial activity of soaps made from waste frying oils.


Keywords


skin microbiome, staphylococci, frying oils, soap, disinfection, new soap application, Bioscreen

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Abdoulaye T., Severin K. K., Bakary C., Karamoko O., Adama C. Antibacterial activity of soap containing hexane extract of leaves of Morinda morindoides (Morinda; Rubiaceae) against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci, 2017; 6: 512-517.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

2. Aiello A.E., Larson E. Antibacterial cleaning and hygiene products as an emerging risk factor for antibiotic resistance in the community. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2003; 3(8): 501-506.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

3. Aiello A.E., Larson E.L., Levy S.B. Consumer antibacterial soaps: effective or just risky? Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2007; 45(2): S137-S147.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

4. Anon, 2020: [ebook] Available at: http://www.bioscreen.fi/images/Bioscreen%20User%20Manual%202015.pdf
[Accessed 30 Jan. 2020]

5. Azahar W.N.A.W., Bujang M., Jaya R.P., Hainin M.R., Mohamed A., Ngad N. Jayanti D.S. The potential of waste cooking oil as bio-asphalt for alternative binder - an overview. Jurnal Teknologi, 2016; 78(4): 111-116.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

6. Bedoux G., Roig B., Thomas O., Dupont V., Le Bot B. Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2012; 19(4): 1044-1065.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

7. Brandwein M., Doron S., Shiri M. Microbial biofilms and the human skin microbiome. NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes, 2016; 2(1): 1-6.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

8. Félix S., Araújo J., Pires A.M., Sousa A.C. Soap production: A green prospective. Waste Management, 2017; 6: 190-195.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

9. Griffin S.G., Markham J.L., Leach D.N. An agar dilution method for the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration of essential oils. Journal of Essential Oil Research, 2000; 12: 249-255.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

10. James J.Y., Manus M.B., Mueller O., Sarah C. Windsor, Julie E. Horvath, Charles L. Nunn. Antibacterial soap use impacts skin microbial communities in rural Madagascar. PLOS ONE, 2018; 13(8): e0199899.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

11. Kolarević S., Milovanović D., Avdović M., Oalđe M., Kostić J., Sunjog K., Nikolić B., Knežević-Vukčević J., Vuković-Gačić B. Optimisation оf the microdilution method for detection of minimum inhibitory concentration values in selected bacteria. Botanica Serbica, 2016; 40: 29-36.

12. Lambert R.J., Johnston M.D., Simons E.A. Disinfectant testing: use of the Bioscreen Microbiological Growth Analyser for laboratory biocide screening. Letters in Applied Micro­biology, 1998; 26: 288-292.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

13. Maniak B., Szmigielski M., Piekarski W. and Markowska A. Physicochemical changes of post frying sunflower oil. Int. Agrophysics, 2009; 23: 243-248.

14. Maotsela T., Gwiranai D., Edison M. Utilization of Waste Cooking Oil and Tallow for Production of Toilet "Bath" Soap. Procedia Manufacturing, 2019; 35: 541-545.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

15. Nikolaou I.E., Evangelinos K.I. Allan S. A reverse logistics social responsibility evaluation framework based on the triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013; 56: 173-184.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

16. Obi C.N. Antibacterial Activities of Some Medicated Soaps on Selected Human Pathogens. American Journal of Microbiological Research, 2014; 2(6): 178-181.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

17. Percival S.L., Emanuel C., Cutting K.F., Williams, D.W. Microbiology of the skin and the role of biofilms in infection. International Wound Journal, 2012; 9: 14-32.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

18. Riaz S., Adeel A., Shahida H. Antibacterial activity of soaps against daily encountered bacteria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2009; 8(8): 1431-1436.

19. Scalise A., Bianchi A., Tartaglione C., Bolletta E., Pierangeli M., Torresetti M., Marazzi M., Di Benedetto G. Microenvironment and microbiology of skin wounds: the role of bacterial biofilms and related factors. In: Seminars in Vascular Surgery, Vol. 28, WB Saunders, 2015; No. 3-4: 151-159.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

20. Singh-Ackbarali D., Maharaj R., Mohamed N., Ramjattan-Harry V. Potential of used frying oil in paving material: solution to environmental pollution problem. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017; 24: 12220-12226.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

21. Syed A.K., Ghosh S., Love N.G., Boles B.R. Triclosan promotes Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization. MBio, 2014; 5(2): e01015-13.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

22. Wu Y., Griffiths M.W., McKellar R.C. A comparison of the Bioscreen method and microscopy for the determination of lag times of individual cells of Listeria monocytogenes. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2000; 30: 468-472.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 B. Antonić, D. Dordević, S. Jančíková, I. Kushkevych

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.