THE SURVIVAL OF LACTOBACILLI AND AGROBACTERIA INTRODUCED INTO PLANT PHYLLOSPHERE

N. V. Korotaieva, N. V. Limanska, O. V. Basiul, Zh. Yu. Sergieieva, V. O. Ivanytsia


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0902.409

Abstract


The survival of bacteria Lactobacillus plantarum ОNU 12 on leaf surfaces of Kalanchoe daigremontiana Mill., green shoots of grape Vitis vinifera L. cultivar Pinot noire, stems of tomato plants Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cultivar Ballada, and the joint survival of L. plantarum ОNU 12 and the phytopathogenic bacteria Rhizobium radiobacter C58 in case of the simultaneous inoculation of kalanchoe leaf surfaces was investigated. It was shown that the lactic acid bacteria survived on tomato and grape stems for 30 days and on kalanchoe leaves more than 30 days. In any variant of the simultaneous inoculations with lactic acid bacteria, R. radiobacter C58 was not found on the surfaces of plants already after the third day of the experiment. In case of the simultaneous application with the phytopathogen, lactic acid bacteria L. plantarum ONU 12 survived on plant surfaces for 8 days whereas being inoculated before or after the phytopathogen – survived for 14 days. The protective activity of lactic acid bacteria in inhi­biting the crown gall on test plants was shown. Lactic acid bacteria L. plantarum ONU 12 appeared to be the perspective microorganisms for biological protection against infection caused by the phytopathogen Rhizobium radiobacter and R. vitis.


Keywords


Lactobacillus plantarum, Rhizobium radiobacter, introduction, plants, survival

References


1. Bertani G. Studies on lysogenesis. I. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol, 1951; 62: 293-300.

2. de Man J.C., Rogosa M., Sharpe M.E. A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol, 1960; 23: 130-135.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1960.tb00188.x

3. de Vries M.C., Vaughan E.E., Kleerebezem M., de Vos W.M. Lactobacillus plantarum - survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal tract. Intern. Dairy J, 2006; 16: 1018-1028.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.09.003

4. Escobar M.A., Dandekar A.M. Agrobacterium tumefaciens as an agent of disease. Trends in Plant Science, 2003; 8(8): 380-386.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00162-6

5. Galkіn M.B., Lіmanska N.V., Phіlіpova Т.О., Ivanytsіa V.O. Biofilm formation by Lactobacillus plantarum bacteria on Lepidium sativum L. roots. Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012; 3: 34-43. (In Ukrainian)
https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-4663.2012.3(19).92620

6. Korotaeva N.V., Kondratiuk T.V., Basiul O.V. et al. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum ONU 87 in mixture with autolysate of erwinias on formation of tumors caused by Rhizobium radiobacter C58. Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013; 22(2): 6-14.
https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-4663.2013.2(22).48880

7. Kos B., Suskovic J., Vukovic S. et al. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. J. Appl. Microbiol, 2003; 94: 981-987.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01915.x
PMid:12752805

8. Kurylenko V.V., Ivanova E.P., Mikhailov V.V. Features of the adhesion of epiphytic bacteria on the leaves of the sea grass Zostera marina and non-biological surfaces. Microbiology, 2007; 76 (4): 502-506. (In Russian)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261707040091

9. Lwin M., Ranamukhaarachchi S. L. Development of biological control of Ralstonia solanacearum through antagonistic microbial populations. Int. J. Agricult. Biol, 2006; 8(5): 657-660.

10. Mobili P., Gerbino E., Tymczyszyn E.E., Gomez-Zavaglia A. S-layers in lactobacilli: structural characteristics and putative role in surface and probiotic properties of whole bacteria. Current Research, Technology and Educational Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology. In: Mendez-Vilas A. (Ed.). FORMATEX, Argentine, 2010: 1224-1234.

11. Reina L.D., Fleming H.P., Breidt F.Jr. Bacterial contamination of cucumber fruit through adhesion. J. Food Protection, 2002; 65(7): 1881-1887.
https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-65.12.1881

12. Sergeeva Zh.U., Krylova K.D., Limanska N.V. et al. Influence of bacteria Lactobacillus plantarum ONU-87 and autolysate of bacteria Erwinia carotovora ZM1 on soft rot disease infectious process. Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012; 20(4): 18-28.
https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-4663.2012.4(20).90438

13. Tallon R., Arias S., Bressolier P., Urdaci M.C. Strain- and matrix-dependent adhesion of Lactobacillus plantarum is mediated by proteinaceous bacterial compounds. J. Appl. Microbiol, 2007; 102: 442-451.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03086.x
PMid:17241350

14. Prokaryotes. Third Ed. A Handbook on the biology of bacteria: firmicutes, cyanobacteria. In: Dworkin M., Falkow S., Rosenberg E. et al. (Ed.). Springer, 2006: 336-338.

15. Trias R., Baneras L., Montesinos E., Badosa E. Lactic acid bacteria from fresh fruit and vegetables as biocontrol agents of phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi. International Microbiology, 2008; 11: 231-236.

16. Young J.M., Kuykendall L.D., Martinez-Romero E. et al. A revision of Rhizobium Frank 1889, with an emended description of the genus, and the inclusion of all species of Agrobacterium Conn 1942 and Allorhizobium undicola de Lajude et al. 1998 as new combinations: Rhizobium radiobacter, R. rhizogenes, R. rubi, R. undicola and R. vitis. Int. Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2001; 51: 89-103.
https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-1-89
PMid:11211278


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Studia biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.