MARGINAL AND EXTERNAL GORGANY FLORA’S SYNANTHROPIZATION

K. Danylyuk


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0903.420

Abstract


A scarce information is avaliable on vascular plants of Marginal and External Gorgany flora. A focused study of its synanthropic component was not implemented. Analysis of the herbaria collections, published data and own field research findings found that synanthropic fraction of flora consists of 268 species (28 % of the species composition of the flora), 144 (54 %) of which are apophytes, 124 (46 %) – adventive species (inclu­ding archeophytes – 66 (52.8 %) species and kenophytes comprises group of 58 (47.2 %). 75 (52.1 %) species of apophytes group participates only in the ruderal communities, 54 (37.5 %) species – both in the segetal and ruderal ones, only in segetal – 15 (10.4 %) species. A low percentage of segetal species is explained by a small fraction of the plowed areas and the fact that agricultural land is not plowed up annually and periodically are left fallow. Most by species of adventive fraction of Marginal and External Gorgany flora have a tendency to occupy man-made habitats (A) – 83.3 %, semi-natural (S) – 23.0 %, 16 % of listed species into natural communities (N) penetrate. On the altitudinal gradient, synanthropic species are distributed evenly. It is associated with a small difference altitudinal range of the study area and considerable forest cover. Most synanthropic species prefer the meadow cenoses because they are more anthropogenically modified than the forests.


Keywords


flora, vascular plants, synanthropization, Marginal and External Gorgany

References


1. Chopyk V. (Ed.). Plants of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1977. 434 p. (In Ukrainian)

2. Danylyuk K. History of study of Marginal and External Gorgany flora. Studia Biologica, 2014; 8(1): 237-246. (In Ukrainian)
https://doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0801.333

3. Gureeva I. Herbarium case. Tomsk: The Publishing House of Tomsk University, 2013. 194 p. (In Russian)

4. Kornaś J. Geograficzno-historyczna klasyfikacja roślin synantropijnych. Mater. Zakł. Fitosoc. Stos, UW. Warszawa; Białowieża, 1968; 25: 33-41.

5. Kruhlov I. Delimitation, metrisation and classification of morphogenic ecoregions for the Ukrainian Carpathians. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 2008; 3: 59-68. (In Ukrainian)

6. Mosyakin S., Fedoronchuk M. Vascular plants of Ukraine. A nomenclatural checklist. Kiev, 1999. 345 p.

7. Prokudin Yu. (Ed.). Keys to Vascular Plants of Ukraine. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1987. 548 p. (In Russian)

8. Protopopova V. Influence of adventive plant species on plants of Ukraine. In: Sheliag-Sosonko Yu. (Ed.) Assessment and Ways to Reduce Threats to Biodiversity of Ukraine. Kyiv: Himgest, 2003: 129-155. (In Ukrainian)

9. Protopopova V. Synanthropic flora of Ukraine and ways of its development. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1991. 204 p. (In Russian)

10. Takhtajan A. Flowering plants. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009. 871 p.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9609-9

11. Tokarska-Guzik B., Dajdok Z., Zając M. et al. Rośliny obcego pochodzenia w Polsce ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem gatunków inwazyjnych. Warszawa, 2012. 197 p.

12. Yunnatov A. Content of geobotanical research. Selection of test areas and the initiation of environmental profiles. In: Lavrenko E., Korchagina A. (Ed.) Field Geobotany. Moscow, Leningrad, 1964(3): 9-35. (In Russian)

13. Zając A. Studies on the origin of archaeophytes in Poland. Part II. Taxa of Mediterranean and Atlantic-Mediterranean origin. Zesz. Nauk. Un-tu Jagiellońskiego. Prace Botan, 1987; 14: 7-50.

14. Zając A. Studies on the origin of archaeophytes in Poland. Part III. Taxa of Irano-Turanian, Euro-Siberian-Irano-Turanian and Mediterranean-Irano-Turanian origin. Zesz. Nauk. Un-tu Jagiellońskiego. Prace Botan, 1987; 15: 93-129.

15. Zając A. Studies on the origin of archaeophytes in Poland. Part IV. Taxa of Pontic-Pannonian, Mediterraneo-South-Asiatic, South-Asiatic and Middle-European origin. Archaeophyta anthropogena. Archaeophyta resistentia. Archaeophytes of unknown origin. Zesz. Nauk. Un-tu Jagiellońskiego. Prace Botan, 1988; 17: 23-51.

16. Zając A., Zając M., Tokarska-Guzik B. Kenophytes in the flora of Poland: list, status and origin. Phytocoenosis. Synanthropization of Plant Cover in New Polish Research. 1998; 10: 107-116.

17. Zając M., Zając A. A tentative list of segetal and ruderal apophytes in Poland. Zesz. Nauk. Un-tu Jagiellońskiego. Prace Botan, 1992; 24: 8-21.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Studia biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.