THE INVERSE GAUSSIAN PLUME METHOD FOR ESTIMATING THE LEVEL OF AIR POLLUTION

Volodymyr Hura, Liubomyr Monastyrskyi

Abstract


Background. Rapid industrialization and urbanization have escalated air pollution, posing significant health and environmental threats. Precise quantification of air pollutant dispersion is critical for effective control and mitigation strategies. The Inverse Gaussian Plume Model (IGPM) is a robust analytical tool used for estimating pollutant concentration levels from point sources.

Materials and Methods. This research utilized IGPM to estimate ground-level concentrations of airborne pollutants originating from specific point sources. The model's application was rigorously grounded in comprehensive datasets encompassing detailed meteorological parameters, essential source emission characteristics, and relevant topographical information. Meteorological inputs included hourly averaged wind speed and direction, atmospheric stability classifications, ambient temperature, and mixing layer height, which collectively govern pollutant transport and dilution. Source characteristics incorporated stack height, flue gas exit velocity, gas temperature, and pollutant emission rates specific to the investigated sources. Topographical data considered local terrain features that could influence plume trajectory and dispersion patterns.

Results and Discussion. The model successfully predicted pollutant concentrations, demonstrating high correlation with observed data. Sensitivity analyses underscored the influence of atmospheric stability and wind speed on plume dispersion. The IGPM proved effective in diverse meteorological scenarios, emphasizing its adaptability for air quality assessments.

Conclusion. The findings of this investigation affirm that IGPM serves as a reliable and accurate methodology for estimating air pollution levels stemming from point sources. Its demonstrated predictive capability makes it an asset for enhancing environmental monitoring programs, potentially supplementing fixed monitoring networks and identifying areas of concern. Furthermore, the model's utility extends significantly into the domain of regulatory compliance, facilitating environmental impact assessments for proposed industrial activities and evaluating the effectiveness of emission control measures.

Keywords: air pollution, Inverse Gaussian Plume Model, forecasting, pollutant concentration, autonomous systems, control algorithms, machine learning.


Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. Smith, J.A., et al. (2019). Advances in Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Application. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(12), 6511-6519.
  2. Jones, A.M. (2015). Challenges in Predicting Air Quality: Implications of Model Uncertainty and Da-ta Limitations. Atmospheric Environment, 107, 88-101.
  3. Diaz, J., Reyna, S. (2018). Estimation of Air Pollutant Emissions Using Inverse Dispersion Modeling: A Review. Journal of Air & Waste Management Association, 68(3), 224-239.
  4. Chen, Y., et al. (2021). Application of Inverse Modeling Methods for Identification of Point Source Emissions. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 12(2), 101-112.
  5. Nguyen, H.T., et al. (2022). Evaluating the Inverse Gaussian Plume Method for Source Apportionment in Urban Environments. Atmosphere, 13(2), 211.
  6. Li, Y., Sokhi, R. (2021). Understanding the Meteorological Influence on Urban Air Pollution with Implications for Regulation and Management. Urban Climate, 35, 100719.
  7. Zhou, B., et al. (2019). Leveraging Advanced Technology for High-Resolution Air Pollution Exposure Measurements and Modeling. Environmental Research, 176, 108549.
  8. Kumar, P., et al. (2020). New Directions: Air Pollution Challenges for Developing Megacities like Delhi. Atmospheric Environment, 224, 117353.
  9. Morawska, L., et al. (2018). Applications of Low-Cost Sensing Technologies for Air Quality Monitoring and Exposure Assessment: How Far Have They Gone? Environment International, 116, 286-299.
  10. Jacob, D.J., Winner, D.A. (2009). Effect of Climate Change on Air Quality. Atmospheric Environment, 43(1), 51-63.
  11. Carruthers, D. J., et al. (2015). A review of the efficacy of the Gaussian plume dispersion model and its applications in risk assessment and management. Risk Management, 17(1), 1-22.
  12. Smith, J. D., & Lee, K. (2017). Evaluating Dispersion Coefficients in Gaussian Plume Modeling for Industrial Emissions. Journal of Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 22(4), 271-283.
  13. Miller, E. J., et al. (2015). Evaluating the Performance of Inverse Modeling Techniques for Estimating Emissions in Urban Areas. Journal of Air & Waste Management, 65(8), 987-1000.
  14. Thompson, R. L., et al. (2015). "Inverse Modelling Techniques for the Assessment of Source Contributions to Air Quality Parameters". Environmental Modelling & Software, 67, 170-183.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/eli.29.9

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.