MOSS VEGETATION OF CLASS СЕRATODONTO PURPUREI-POLYTRICHЕTEA PILIFERI MOHAN 1978 IN NATURAL AND URBAN ECOSYSTEMS OF THE FOREST-STEPPE OF UKRAINE

Svitlana Hapon, Yurii Hapon, Lyubov Felbaba-Klushyna, Andrii Bizilya


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.2002.888

Abstract


Background. Bryophyte vegetation and its classification are increasingly attracting the attention of both bryologists and geobotanists. Due to their morphological and biological organization, as well as their ecological-biological and ecological-coenotic features, bryophytes manifest their coenotic role in ecosystems in various ways. They may either constitute part of the general herbaceous cover as synusiae, or they form distinct bryocoenoses with different substrate specificities-epigeic, epiphytic, and epixylic-which are classified separately from vascular plant communities using the eco-floristic classification approach to Braun-Blanquet.
At present, detailed studies of individual syntaxa of moss vegetation at the class level are becoming increasingly important. Therefore, the aim of this study was to charac­terize the class Ceratodonto purpurei-Polytrichеtea piliferi in natural and urban ecosystems of the Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine.
Materials and Methods. The material for this study consisted of geobotanical relevés of bryocoenoses belonging to this class of moss vegetation, identified within natural ecosystems of the Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine and urban ecosystems of several regional cities in the Left-Bank Dnipro Region. Bryophyte communities were classified according to the eco-floristic classification based on the Braun-Blanquet approach, following standard methodological guidelines.
Data processing and analysis were carried out using JUICE.NET software and the updated version of the TWINSPAN algorithm. The classification scheme of moss vegetation was developed using leading classification systems proposed in Central and Western Europe, taking into account the results of our own research. The nomenclature of bryophytes follows “Prodromus of Spore Plants of Ukraine: Bryophytes” (Virchenko et al, 2022), while lichens’ nomenclature follows “Prodromus of Spore Plants: Lichens” (Kondratiuk et al, 2021).
Results. Moss vegetation of the class Ceratodonto purpurei-Polytrichеtea piliferi in natural and urban ecosystems of the Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine was characterized, and its classification scheme was developed. The studied class of moss vegetation is represented by one order, two alliances, six associations, and five subassociations. The alliance Ceratodonto purpurei-Polytrichion piliferi Waldh. ex v. Hübschm. 1967 is represented by the associations Racomitrio-Polytrichetum piliferi, Brachythecietum albicantis, Polytrichetum juniperini, Buxbaumietum aphyllae, and Syntrichietum ruraliformis. The first association is also represented by four subassociations. The alliance Campylopodion polytrichoidis Giacomini 1951 is represented by the association Polytricho-formosi-Campylopodetum polytrichoides. For each identified syntaxon, ecological and eco-coenotic characteristics, as well as localities within the region, are presented. The association Polytricho-formosi-Campylopodetum polytrichoides is reported for the first time in Ukraine.
Conclusions. Unlike in Western Europe, within the studied region, class Ceratodonto purpurei-Polytrichеtea piliferi is represented by a small number of syntaxa, which are primarily confined to pine forests, sand arenas, and occasionally steppe areas. The moss vegetation of the studied territory within the class includes one order, two alliances, six associations, and five subassociations. All identified associations and subassociations were documented within natural ecosystems. Of these, two associations and four subassociations were also recorded in urban ecosystems. Therefore, further research on the bryocoenoses of this class in Ukraine is promising and requires a detailed study.


Keywords


bryophytes, bryocoenoses, bryophyte communities, bryosyntaxa, eco-floristic classification, Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine, pine and mixed forests, Latoritsa River basin, beech forests

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alataş, M. (2018). Checklist of Turkish bryophyte vegetation. Botanica Serbica, 42(2), 173-179.
Google Scholar

Alataş, M., & Uyar, G. (2017). A new bryophyte community and three new records for the epiphytic bryophyte vegetation of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, 41, 308-323. doi:10.3906/bot-1611-23
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Alataş, M., Batan, N., Ezer, T., Özdemir, T., & Erata, H. (2021). Epiphytic bryophyte communities of forests dominated by Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertner in Altindere Valley National Park (Trabzon, Turkey). Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 42(11), 155-167. doi:10.5252/cryptogamie-bryologie2021v42a11
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Alataş, M., Ezer, T., Erata, H., Batan, N., & Ursavaş, S. (2023). The epiphytic bryophyte vegetation of Buxus sempervirens L. forests in the Fırtına Valley (Rize, Turkey). Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 44(5), 123-132. doi:10.5252/cryptogamie-bryologie2023v44a5
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bardat, J., & Hauguel, J.-C. (2002). Synopsis bryosociologique pour la France. Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 23(4), 279-343.
Google Scholar

Batan, N., Özcan, O., Ezer, T., Erata, H., & Alataş, M. (2025). The epiphytic bryophyte vegetation of the Karçal Mountains (Artvin, Türkiye). Biology Bulletin, 52(38), 11-28. doi:10.1134/s1062359024606992
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Can Gözcü, M., Uyar, G., Alataş, M., Ezer, T., & Ören, M. (2018). Epiphytic bryophyte vegetation of the Samanlı Mountains (Sakarya-Kocaeli-Yalova-Bursa) in Northwest Turkey. Botanica Serbica, 42(2), 157-171.
Google Scholar

Didukh, Y., Chorney, I., Budzhak, V., Vasheniak, J., Bezsmertna, O., Gleb, R., & Nyporko, S. (2023). Rare shady chasmophytic habitat communities (8210) in Ukraine. Hacquetia, 22(2), 143-160. doi:10.2478/hacq-2022-0022
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Hapon, S. V., & Hapon, Yu. S. (2018). Syntaksonomiia mokhovoi roslynnosti Ukrainy (Lisostep) [Syntaxonomy of bryophyte vegetation of Ukraine (Forest-Steppe)]. FOP Kulibaba. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

Hugonnot, V., Pépin, F., & Freedman, J. (2026). Bryophyte communities from AlUla County (Saudi Arabia). Nova Hedwigia. doi:10.1127/nova_hedwigia/1128
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Karpinets, L. I., Lobachevska, O. V., & Sokhanchak, R. R. (2017). Ecological structure of epigeic synusiae of mosses on rock dumps of Chervonograd industrial mining region. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 74(2), 154-162. doi:10.15407/ukrbotj74.02.154. (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Kentjens, W., Glenny, D., Curran, T. J., & Sullivan, J. J. (2025). Bryophyte community composition is influenced by microhabitat and cover of vascular plants and lichens in New Zealand montane forest. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 63(4), 573-596. doi:10.1080/0028825x.2023.2284205
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Khodosovtsev, O. Ye., & Boiko, M. F. (2012). Lichen and bryophyte associations at the black sea biosphere reserve (Ivano-Rybalchansky plot). Pryrodnychyi Almanakh, 18, 199-206. https://geobot.org.ua/files/publication/949/169-631-1-pb.pdf (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

Khodosovtsev, A., Boiko, M., Nadyeina, O., & Khodosovtseva, Y. (2011). Lichen and bryophyte associations on the lower Dnieper sand dunes: syntaxonomy and weathering indication. Chornomorski Botanical Journal, 7(1), 44-66. doi:10.14255/2308-9628/11.71/5 (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Kondratiuk, S. Ya., Popova, L. P., Fedorenko, N. M., & Khodosovtsev, O. Ye. (2021). Prodromus sporovykh roslyn Ukrainy: lyshainyky [Prodromus of spore plants of Ukraine: lichen-forming fungi] (P. M. Tsarenko, Ed.). Naukova dumka. https://botany.kiev.ua/doc/prodr_lysh.pdf (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

Marino, M. L., Campisi, P., & Cirlincione, F. (2025). Old-growth forests and bryophyte communities in Italy and the broader Mediterranean region: a literature review. Plants, 14(18), 2824. doi:10.3390/plants14182824
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Marstaller, R. (2006). Syntaxonomischer Konspekt der Moosgesellschaften Europas und angrenzender Gebiete. Haussknechtia Beiheft 13.
Google Scholar

Marstaller, R. (2017). Moosgesellschaften auf Schieferhalden in der Umgebung von Ludwigsstadt im Frankenwald (Landkreis Kronach, Oberfranken). Berichte der Bayerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft, 87, 129-158.
Google Scholar

Mehta, D., & Shah, D. (2023). Bryophyte colonization on the monuments of Champaner Pavagadh - UNESCO World Heritage Site and its association with geological substrates. Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 44(8), 183-195. doi:10.5252/cryptogamie-bryologie2023v44a8
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Möller, T., Kaufmann, S., & Hauck, M. (2026). Effects of habitat quality and fine-scale spatial structure on epiphytic lichen and bryophyte communities. Journal of Ecology, 114(3), e70274. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.70274
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Mucina, L., Bültmann, H., Dierßen, K., Theurillat, J. P., Raus, T., Čarni, A., ... & Tichý, L. (2016). Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Applied Vegetation Science, 19(1), 3-264. doi:10.1111/avsc.12257
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Pleskach, L., Virchenko, V., & Onyshchenko, V. (2024). Epiphytic bryophyte communities of the Dendrological Park "Olexandria" of the NAS of Ukraine. Plant Introduction, 101-102, 19-30./doi:10.46341/pi2024002
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Puglisi, M., Privitera, M., & Spampinato, G. (2022). The bryophyte vegetation of the gypsum outcrops of Sicily. Plant Sociology, 59(2), 27-37. doi:10.3897/pls2022592/03
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Putrika, A., Salamah, A., Winarni, N. L., Hendrayanti, D., & Dewi, C. (2026). The epiphytic bryophyte diversity across urban land-use type in Southern Jakarta. Journal of Urban Ecology, 12(1), juag002. doi:10.1093/jue/juag002
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Rahulina, M. Ye., & Orlov, O. L. (2021). Bryophyte vegetation of the rock outcrops of "Chortova Skelia" forest reserve and its anthropogenic dynamics. Proceedings of the State Natural History Museum, 37, 131-142. doi:10.36885/nzdpm.2021.37.131-142 (In Ukrainian)
Crossref

Rahulina, M., Orlov, O., & Borniak, U. (2024). Obrostannia kryptohamiv na murakh oboronnoho monastyria dominikantsiv u Pidkameni v konteksti zberezhennia pam'iatok arkhitektury [Biofouling of cryptogams on the walls of the Dominican defensive monastery in Pidkamin in the context of architectural heritage conservation]. In Istoriia Pidkamenia v konteksti politychnykh, sotsialno-ekonomichnykh ta kulturnykh protsesiv na zakhidnoukrainskykh zemliakh (Vol. 4, pp. 269-274). Levada. (In Ukrainian)

Rumin, P., & Rimac, A. (2025). Epiphytic bryophytes of an urban forest: diversity, ecology, and host tree preference in Maksimir Forest Park, Zagreb. Natura Croatica, 34(2), 303-325. doi:10.20302/nc.2025.34.24
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Su, X., Qi, T., Li, Y., Wang, W., Li, D., Yang, X., & Hao, J. (2025). Bryophyte community composition and diversity as bioindicators of elevational zonation in tropical rainforests in Hainan Island, China. Plants, 14(20), 3209. doi:10.3390/plants14203209
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Takashima-Oliveira, T. T. G., De Medeiros, P. S., & Tavares-Martins, A. C. C. (2020). Bryophyte communities across the ecological succession process in the Caxiuanã National Forest, Pará, Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 92(1), e20180626. doi:10.1590/0001-3765202020180626
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Virchenko, V. M., & Nyporko, S. O. (2022). Prodromus sporovykh roslyn Ukrainy: mokhopodibni [Prodromus of spore plants of Ukraine: bryophytes] (P. M. Tsarenko, Ed.). Naukova dumka. https://www.botany.kiev.ua/doc/prodr_moh.pdf (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Svitlana Hapon, Yurii Hapon, Lyubov Felbaba-Klushyna, Andrii Bizilya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.