INTEGRATIVE ASSESSMENT OF BIOCHAR IMPACTS ON SOIL CHEMISTRY, PLANT WATER RELATIONS, AND PHOTOSYNTHETIC PIGMENT CONTENT IN FRAGARIA × ANANASSA

Stepan Tehlivets, Yeva Zaritska, Artur Banach, Nataliya Romanyuk


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.2003.895

Abstract


Background. Biochar is widely promoted as a soil amendment that can improve fertility, retain nutrients, and enhance crop performance, yet its effects vary strongly with soil type, application rate, and time since application. Evidence for perennial fruit crops grown on fertile soils without mineral fertilizer remains limited. This study evaluated how biochar affects soil chemical properties, leaf physiology, and fruit production of strawberry under field conditions.
Materials and Methods. A two-year field experiment (2024–2025) was conducted with biochar applied at 0, 2, 5, and 10 tonnes per hectare, each treatment replicated in three plots, without synthetic fertilizer. One year after application, composite soil samp­les were analyzed for acidity, soil organic matter, mineral nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulfur, calcium, and magnesium, plant-available and total trace elements, following national standard methods. Leaf relative water content and photosynthetic pigment concentrations were measured in both years, and individual fruit weight and yield were recorded.
Results. Biochar effects on bulk soil chemistry were limited and selective. Phosphorus and potassium, already abundant, and soil acidity remained unchanged. The clearest responses occurred in soluble pools: ammonium nitrogen, water-soluble calcium, and plant-available zinc and mercury declined, while water-soluble magnesium rose sharply, with several effects strongest at the lowest rate. Biochar improved leaf water status in both years and markedly increased chlorophyll b content in the second year, particularly at the highest application rate. In contrast, chlorophyll a and carotenoids levels remained largely unchanged. Compared with the control, fruit weight declined in the 5 t/ha treatment during the second growing season.
Conclusions. Biochar produced measurable but modest effects on the soil-plant system that did not translate into yield gains within two years, indicating that benefits on fertile soils emerge slowly and depend on application rate and management.


Keywords


biochar, strawberry, soil amendment, nitrogen immobilization, chlorophyll, water-soluble cations, crop yield, field experiment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aghoghovwia, M. P., Hardie, A. G., & Rozanov, A. B. (2022). Characterisation, adsorption and desorption of ammonium and nitrate of biochar derived from different feedstocks. Environmental Technology, 43(5), 774-787. doi:10.1080/09593330.2020.1804466
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, C. J., Fitzgerald, J. D., & Hipps, N. A. (2010). Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant and Soil, 337(1-2), 1-18. doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Beesley, L., Moreno-Jiménez, E., Gomez-Eyles, J. L., Harris, E., Robinson, B., & Sizmur, T. (2011). A review of biochars' potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution, 159(12), 3269-3282. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.023
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Biederman, L. A., & Harpole, W. S. (2013). Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy, 5(2), 202-214. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12037
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Blanco-Canqui, H. (2017). Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81(4), 687-711. doi:10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0017
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Davys, D., Rayns, F., Charlesworth, S., & Lillywhite, R. (2023). The effect of different biochar characteristics on soil nitrogen transformation processes: a review. Sustainability, 15(23), 16446. doi:10.3390/su152316446
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

do Nascimento, C. A. C., Pagliari, P. H., Faria, L. d. A., & Vitti, G. C. (2018). Phosphorus mobility and behavior in soils treated with calcium, ammonium, and magnesium phosphates. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 82(3), 622-631. doi:10.2136/sssaj2017.06.0211
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Garzoli, S., Cairone, F., Carradori, S., Mocan, A., Menghini, L., Paolicelli, P., Ak, G., Zengin, G., & Cesa, S. (2020). Effects of processing on polyphenolic and volatile composition and fruit quality of Clery strawberries. Antioxidants, 9(7), 632. doi:10.3390/antiox9070632
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Gelardi, D. L., Ainuddin, I. H., Rippner, D. A., Patiño, J. E., Abou Najm, M., & Parikh, S. J. (2021). Biochar alters hydraulic conductivity and impacts nutrient leaching in two agricultural soils. Soil, 7(2), 811-825. doi:10.5194/soil-7-811-2021
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

He, L., Zhong, H., Liu, G., Dai, Z., Brookes, P. C., & Xu, J. (2019). Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils by biochar: mechanisms, potential risks and applications in China. Environmental Pollution, 252(Pt A), 846-855. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.151
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

He, Y., Yao, Y., Ji, Y., Deng, J., Zhou, G., Liu, R., Shao, J., Zhou, L., Li, N., Zhou, X., & Bai, S. H. (2020). Biochar amendment boosts photosynthesis and biomass in C3 but not C4 plants: a global synthesis. GCB Bioenergy, 12(8), 605-617. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12720
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Ippolito, J. A., Cui, L., Kammann, C., Wrage-Mönnig, N., Estavillo, J. M., Fuertes-Mendizábal, T., Cayuela, M. L., Sigua, G., Novak, J., Spokas, K., & Borchard, N. (2020). Feedstock choice, pyrolysis temperature and type influence biochar characteristics: a comprehensive meta-data analysis review. Biochar, 2(4), 421-438. doi:10.1007/s42773-020-00067-x
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

IUSS Working Group WRB. (2006). World reference base for soil resources 2006: a framework for international classification, correlation and communication (World Soil Resources Reports No. 103). FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/a0510e/A0510E.pdf

Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., van der Velde, M., & Bastos, A. C. (2011). A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 144(1), 175-187. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, S., Cowie, A. L., Van Zwieten, L., Bolan, N., Budai, A., Buss, W., Cayuela, M. L., Graber, E. R., Ippolito, J. A., Kuzyakov, Y., Luo, Y., Ok, Y. S., Palansooriya, K. N., Shepherd, J., Stephens, S., Weng, Z., & Lehmann, J. (2021). How biochar works, and when it doesn't: a review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar. GCB Bioenergy, 13(11), 1731-1764. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12885
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Khan, Z., Fan, X., Khan, M. N., Khan, M. A., Zhang, K., Fu, Y., & Shen, H. (2022). The toxicity of heavy metals and plant signaling facilitated by biochar application: implications for stress mitigation and crop production. Chemosphere, 308(Pt 3), 136466. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136466
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Khomenchuk, V. O., Herts, A. I., Kononchuk, O. B., & Herts, N. V. (2022). Use of biochar and giant Miscanthus (Miscanthus giganteus) for remediation of soil contaminated by petroleum products. Scientific Issue Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University. Series: Biology, 82(4), 36-48. doi:10.25128/2078-2357.22.4.5 (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Kloss, S., Zehetner, F., Dellantonio, A., Hamid, R., Ottner, F., Liedtke, V., Schwanninger, M., Gerzabek, M. H., & Soja, G. (2012). Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41(4), 990-1000. doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0070
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2024). Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In J. Lehmann & S. Joseph (Eds.), Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation (3rd ed., pp. 1-14). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003297673-1
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Lentz, R. D., Ippolito, J. A., & Lehrsch, G. A. (2019). Biochar, manure, and sawdust alter long-term water retention dynamics in degraded soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 83(5), 1491-1501. doi:10.2136/sssaj2019.04.0115
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1987). Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. In L. Packer & R. Douce (Eds.), Methods in enzymology (Vol. 148, pp. 350-382). Academic Press. doi:10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Lindsay, W. L. (1979). Chemical equilibria in soils. John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar

Luo, L., Li, J., Xing, Z., Jing, T., Wang, X., & Zhang, G. (2025). Biochar for mitigating nitrate leaching in agricultural soils: mechanisms, challenges, and future directions. Water, 17(17), 2590. doi:10.3390/w17172590
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Makar, O. O., Patsula, O. I., Kavulych, Y. Z., Batrashkina, T. I., Bunio, L. V., Kozlovskyy, V. I., Vatamaniuk, O., Terek, O. O., & Romanyuk, N. D. (2019). Excised leaf water status as a measure of drought resistance of Ukrainian spring wheat. Studia Biologica, 13(2), 41-54. doi:10.30970/sbi.1302.604
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Makar, O., Kuźniar, A., Patsula, O., Kavulych, Y., Kozlovskyy, V., Wolińska, A., Skórzyńska-Polit, E., Vatamaniuk, O., Terek, O., & Romanyuk, N. (2021). Bacterial endophytes of spring wheat grains and the potential to acquire Fe, Cu, and Zn under their low soil bioavailability. Biology, 10(5), 409. doi:10.3390/biology10050409
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Mazurak, O., Mazurak, I., Razanova, A., & Kovaliv, Yu. (2025). Biochar from agricultural waste: sustainable development technologies. Bulletin of Lviv National Environmental University. Series Agronomy, 29, 37-43. doi:10.31734/agronomy2025.29.037 (In Ukrainian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Orlandella, I., Smith, K. N., Belcore, E., Ferrero, R., Piras, M., & Fiore, S. (2025). Monitoring strawberry plants' growth in soil amended with biochar. AgriEngineering, 7(10), 324. doi:10.3390/agriengineering7100324
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Rathinapriya, P., Maharajan, T., Lim, T.-J., Kang, B., & Jeong, S. T. (2025). Biochar enhances nutrient uptake, yield, and NHX gene expression in Chinese cabbage under salinity stress. Plants, 14(17), 2743. doi:10.3390/plants14172743
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Razzaghi, F., Obour, P. B., & Arthur, E. (2020). Does biochar improve soil water retention? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geoderma, 361, 114055. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114055
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Sarraf, M., Janeeshma, E., Arif, N., Yadav, V., Zahra, N., Bouzroud, S., Mirmazloum, I., Yadi, R., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2024). Biochar for the mitigation of metal/metalloid stress in plants. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 43(10), 3303-3319. doi:10.1007/s00344-024-11335-6
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, H.-P., Kammann, C., Hagemann, N., Leifeld, J., Bucheli, T. D., Sánchez Monedero, M. A., & Cayuela, M. L. (2021). Biochar in agriculture - a systematic review of 26 global meta-analyses. GCB Bioenergy, 13(11), 1708-1730. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12889
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Sil, S., Souza, F. R. d., Bullard, B., Mlsna, T., & Tseng, T.-M. (2025). Biochar herbicide protection pods for mitigating herbicide sensitivity in tomato plants. Agronomy, 15(5), 1188. doi:10.3390/agronomy15051188
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Song, Z., Yan, D., Fang, W., Zhang, D., Jin, X., Li, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, G., Li, Q., & Cao, A. (2023). Response of strawberry fruit yield, soil chemical and microbial properties to anaerobic soil disinfestation with biochar and rice bran. Agriculture, 13(7), 1466. doi:10.3390/agriculture13071466
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

State Standard of Ukraine. (2004). Yakist gruntu. Metody vyznachannia orhanichnoi rechovyny (DSTU 4289:2004) [Soil quality. Methods for determination of organic matter]. https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=56400 (In Ukrainian)

State Standard of Ukraine. (2015). Yakist gruntu. Vyznachennya lehkohidrolizovanoho azotu za metodom Kornfilda (DSTU 7863:2015) [Soil quality. Determination of easily hydrolyzable nitrogen by the Cornfield method]. https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=62745 (In Ukrainian)

State Standard of Ukraine. (2015). Yakist gruntu. Vyznachennya obminnoi kyslotnosti (DSTU 7910:2015) [Soil quality. Determination of exchange acidity]. https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=62774 (In Ukrainian)

State Standard of Ukraine. (2015). Yakist gruntu. Vyznachennia ioniv kaltsiiu ta magniiu u vodnii vytiazhtsi (DSTU 7945:2015) [Soil quality. Determination of calcium and magnesium ions in water extract]. https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=62859 (In Ukrainian)

State Standard of Ukraine. (2015). Yakist gruntu. Vyznachennya rukhomoi sirky v modyfikatsii NNTs IHA imeni O. N. Sokolovskoho (DSTU 8347:2015) [Soil quality. Determination of mobile sulfur in the modification of NSC ISSAR named after O. N. Sokolovsky]. https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=62892 (In Ukrainian)

State Standard of Ukraine. (2007). Yakist gruntu. Vyznachennia pH (DSTU ISO 10390:2007) [Soil quality. Determination of pH]. https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=29452 (In Ukrainian)

State Standard of Ukraine. (2007). Yakist gruntu. Poperednie obroblennia zrazkiv dlia fizyko-khimichnoho analizu (DSTU ISO 11464:2007) [Soil quality. Pretreatment of samples for physioo-chemical analysis]. https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=52911 (In Ukrainian)

Toková, L., Igaz, D., Horák, J., & Aydin, E. (2020). Effect of biochar application and re-application on soil bulk density, porosity, saturated hydraulic conductivity, water content and soil water availability in a silty loam Haplic Luvisol. Agronomy, 10(7), 1005. doi:10.3390/agronomy10071005
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Uchimiya, M., Chang, S., & Klasson, K. T. (2011). Screening biochars for heavy metal retention in soil: role of oxygen functional groups. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 190(1-3), 432-441. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.063
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Umer, S., Akram, N. A., Bukhari, I., & Abdel Latef, A. A. H. (2025). Biochar for alleviation of salinity stress in plants. In A. A. H. Abdel Latef (Ed.), Biochar in mitigating abiotic stress in plants (pp. 173-192). Elsevier. doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-24137-6.00011-2
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Wei, Y., Ma, J., Liu, K., Zhang, S., & Wang, J. (2025). Biochar-based remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils: mechanisms, synergies, and sustainable prospects. Nanomaterials, 15(19), 1487. doi:10.3390/nano15191487
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Wellburn, A. R. (1994). The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. Journal of Plant Physiology, 144(3), 307-313. doi:10.1016/s0176-1617(11)81192-2
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Xiu, L., Sun, Y., & Han, X. (2025). Effects of biochar amendment on potassium supply capacity and potassium accumulation in soybean across diverse soils. Plants, 14(13), 1959. doi:10.3390/plants14131959
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Yan, S., Zhang, S., Yan, P., Wei, Z., Niu, X., & Zhang, H. (2026). Biochar application increased soil carbon sequestration by altering organic carbon components in aggregates. Soil and Tillage Research, 255, 106795. doi:10.1016/j.still.2025.106795
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Yan, X., Wang, Z., Zhao, M., Sun, P., Hao, J., Liu, J., Yan, Y., Jia, Y., & Ge, G. (2024). Hydrothermal biochar enhances the photosynthetic efficiency and yield of alfalfa by optimizing soil chemical properties and stimulating the activity of microbial communities. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 31420. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-83098-9
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Ye, Y., Qiuxue, Z., Tongtong, Y., Congcong, C., Yue, W., Chan, Q., Yusheng, J., Hongwei, S., Qinchao, H., Zhiying, E., Kuide, Y., & Huihui, Z. (2024). Biochar modulates the antioxidant system and hormonal signaling in tobacco under continuous-cropping conditions. Journal of Plant Interactions, 19(1), 2395884. doi:10.1080/17429145.2024.2395884
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Zhang, L., Chang, L., Liu, H., de Jesús Puy Alquiza, M., & Li, Y. (2025). Biochar application to soils can regulate soil phosphorus availability: a review. Biochar, 7(1), 41. doi:10.1007/s42773-024-00415-1
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Zhu, Z., Zhang, Y., Tao, W., Zhang, X., Xu, Z., & Xu, C. (2025). The biological effects of biochar on soil's physical and chemical characteristics: a review. Sustainability, 17(5), 2214. doi:10.3390/su17052214
CrossrefGoogle Scholar


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Stepan Tehlivets, Yeva Zaritska, Artur Banach, Nataliya Romanyuk

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.