INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT BUFFERS ON THE VIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF CANINE SPERMATOZOA DURING STORAGE AT 4–6 °C

Yuriі Litvinchuk, Vitalii Kovpak, Oksana Kovpak, Serhii Derkach, Oleksandr Valchuk, Yuriі Zhuk


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.2003.893

Abstract


Background. Maintaining high fertilization capacity of spermatozoa is a key factor for successful artificial insemination in dogs. Given that the use of chilled semen provides higher pregnancy rates and larger litter sizes compared with frozen semen, the demand for this method of gamete preservation is increasing. Preservation of sperm fertilizing ability in an in vitro system directly depends on the storage medium; however, analysis of current literature indicates that most studies focus on the effects of antioxidants, energy substrates, or membrane protectants, whereas the impact of buffer system parameters on gamete homeostasis during cooling remains insufficiently studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the influence of different buffers on the characteristics of chilled canine semen at 4–6 °C.
Materials and Methods. Extenders differing in their buffer system were added to the second fraction of canine semen: T-BSA (TRIS, pH 6.2), hT-BSA (TRIS, pH 7.3), and HEPES-BSA (HEPES, pH 6.2). Sperm motility, membrane integrity (HOS test), and the level of DNA fragmentation (SCD method, HALOMAX test system) were evaluated every 24 hours over a period of 10 days.
Results and Discussion. It was established that the T-BSA extender (pH 6.2) most effectively ensures long-term preservation of the functional parameters of canine spermatozoa during chilled storage at 4–6 °C. At the same time, DNA integrity remained a stable parameter in all groups, even under conditions of complete loss of sperm motility. Thus, optimization of the buffer parameters of the extender is a key factor in prolonging the shelf life of chilled canine semen in clinical practice.
Conclusion. The T-BSA extender (pH 6.2) was found to be the most effective for preserving the functional parameters of canine spermatozoa during prolonged sto­rage at 4–6 °C. DNA integrity remained a stable parameter in all groups, even in the case of complete loss of motility. Therefore, optimization of the buffer parameters of the extender is a key factor for extending the shelf life of chilled canine semen in clinical practice.


Keywords


semen preservation, TRIS-citrate buffer, HEPES, reproductive biotechno­logy, fertility

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aitken, R. J., Smith, T. B., Jobling, M. S., Baker, M. A., & De Iuliis, G. N. (2014). Oxidative stress and male reproductive health. Asian Journal of Andrology, 16(1), 31-38. doi:10.4103/1008-682x.122203
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Antonov, A. L., Dineva, J., & Georgiev, P. (2014). Dynamics of vaginal pH in the bitch during proestrus and estrus. Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2(4), 101-104. doi:10.11648/j.avs.20140204.13
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bencharif, D., Amirat-Briand, L., Le Guillou, J., Vitelli, C., Anton, M., Schmitt, E., Desherces, S., Barriere, P., & Tainturier, D. (2013). Refrigeration of canine sperm at +4 °C: сomparative study of four different extenders for the refrigeration of canine sperm at +4 °C: LDL, Tris egg yolk, Equex®, and INRA96®. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire. 164(5), 252-262.
Google Scholar

Contri, A., Gloria, A., Robbe, D., Valorz, C., Wegher, L., & Carluccio, A. (2013). Kinematic study on the effect of pH on bull sperm function. Animal Reproduction Science, 136(4), 252-259. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.11.008
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dai, P., Zou, M., Cai, Z., Zeng, X., Zhang, X., & Liang, M. (2024). pH Homeodynamics and male fertility: a coordinated regulation of acid-based balance during sperm journey to fertilization. Biomolecules, 14(6), 685. doi:10.3390/biom14060685
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

De Pauw, I. M. С., Van Soom, A., Mintiens, K., Verberckmoes, S., & de Kruif, A. (2003). In vitro survival of bovine spermatozoa stored at room temperature under epididymal conditions. Theriogenology, 59(5-6), 1093-107. doi:10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01207-4
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Donner, J., Anderson, H., Davison, S., Hughes, A. M., Bouirmane, J., Lindqvist, J., Lytle, K. M., Ganesan, B., Ottka, C., Ruotanen, P., Kaukonen, M., Forman, O. P., Fretwell, N., Cole, C. A., & Lohi, H. (2018). Frequency and distribution of 152 genetic disease variants in over 100,000 mixed breed and purebred dogs. PLoS Genetics, 14(4), e1007361. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007361
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Dziekońska, A., & Partyka, A. (2023). Current status and advances in semen preservation. Animals, 13(1), 123. doi:10.3390/ani13010123
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Hori, T., Yoshikuni, R., Kobayashi, M., & Kawakami, E. (2014). Effects of storage temperature and semen extender on stored canine semen. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 76(2), 259-263. doi:10.1292/jvms.13-0303
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Koppers, A. J., De Iuliis, G. N., Finnie, J. M., McLaughlin, E. A., & Aitken, R. J. (2008). Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 93(8), 3199-3207. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2616
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Lavanya, M., Archana, S. S., Swathi, D., Ramya, L., Arangasamy, A., Binsila, B., Dhali, A., Krishnaswamy, N., Singh, S. K., Kumar, H., Sivaram, M., & Selvaraju, S. (2021). Sperm preparedness and adaptation to osmotic and pH stressors relate to functional competence of sperm in Bos taurus. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 22563. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01928-6
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Lishko, P. V., Kirichok, Y., Ren, D., Navarro, B., Chung, J. J., & Clapham, D. E. (2012). The control of male fertility by spermatozoan ion channels. Annual Review of Physiology, 74(1), 453-475. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-020911-153258
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Litvinchuk, Y. V., Kovpak, V. V., Kovpak, O. S., Derkach, S. S., Valchuk, O. A., & Zhuk, Y. V. (2025). Effects of extenders on the functional activity of chilled canine spermatozoa during prolonged storage. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 16(2), e25087. doi:10.15421/0225087
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Martínez-Barbitta, M., & Rivera Salinas, C. (2022). Evaluation of chilled dog semen extended with sperm activator. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, 764750. doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.764750
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Mason, S. J. (2018). Current review of artificial insemination in dogs. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 48(4), 567-580. doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2018.02.005
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Mendola, R. J., Biswas, L., Schindler, K., Walmsley, R. H., Russell, H., Angle, M., & Garrisi, G.J. (2024). Influx of zwitterionic buffer after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) membrane piercing alters the transcriptome of human oocytes. The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 41(5), 1341-1356. doi:10.1007/s10815-024-03064-2
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Mishra, A. K, Kumar, A., Swain, D. K., Yadav, S., & Nigam, R. (2018). Insights into pH regulatory mechanisms in mediating spermatozoa functions. Veterinary World, 11(6), 852-858. doi:10.14202/vetworld.2018.852-858
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Puja, I. K., Sawitri, N. M., Maharani, N., Gunawan, I. W. N. F., & Heryani, L. G. S. S. (2018). A comparative study on the effects of coconut water based extenders on the quality of kintamani dog semen preserved at 4 °C. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 6(5), 192-196. doi:10.17582/journal.aavs/2018/6.5.192.196
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Quartuccio, M., Biondi, V., Liotta, L., & Passantino, A. (2020). Legislative and ethical aspects on use of canine artificial insemination in the 21st century. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 19(1), 630-643. doi:10.1080/1828051x.2020.1775503
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Rivas, C. U., Ayala, M. E., & Aragón, A. (2022). Effect of various pH levels on the sperm kinematic parameters of boars. South African Journal of Animal Science, 52(5), 693-704. doi:10.4314/sajas.v52i5.13
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Sinagra, L., Polisca, A., Donato, G., Caspanello, T., Pettina, G., Pastore, S., De Majo, M., Cristarella, S., Quartuccio, M., & Zappone, V. (2024). Enhancing canine semen quality through a second centrifugation after 48 hours of storage: a comparative study. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 66(1), 47. doi:10.1186/s13028-024-00767-5
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Suarez, S. S. (2008). Regulation of sperm storage and movement in the mammalian oviduct. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 52(5-6), 455-62. doi:10.1387/ijdb.072527ss
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Wales, R. G., & White, I. G. (1958). The interaction of pH, tonicity and electrolyte concentration on the motility of dog spermatozoa. The Journal of Physiology, 141(2), 273-80. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp005972
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Yániz, J. L., Mateos, J. A., & Santolaria, P. (2012). Tris buffer improves fluorescence yield of ram spermatozoa when evaluating membrane integrity. Microscopy Research and Technique, 75(4), 520-523. doi:10.1002/jemt.21086
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Zduńczyk, S., Domosławska, A., Jamioł, M., & Kankofer, M. (2025). Impact of oxidative stress and antioxidants on semen quality in dogs. Animals, 15(21), 3169. doi:10.3390/ani15213169
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Yuriі Litvinchuk, Vitalii Kovpak, Oksana Kovpak, Serhii Derkach, Oleksandr Valchuk, Yuriі Zhuk

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.