ANTROPOGENIC MATERIALS IN THE NESTS OF PASSERINE BIRDS IN THE WEST OF UKRAINE

Oksana Hnatyna


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1703.723

Abstract


Background. Traditionally birds build their nests out of natural materials that are usually found near the location of the future nest. However, along with the expansion of human economic activity and the appearance of various types of antropogenic mate­rials (hereafter debris) that pollute environment, they appeared in bird nests. Although it is hard to predict with certainty what significance this behavior will have for birds in the future, it is possible to investigate which species are prone to such behavior, which unnatural materials birds choose to build nests, and which factors influence it. This makes it possible to predict how changes in the environment by humans affect the nest-building behavior of different species of birds and the species-specific appearance of the nest. Moreover, incorporation of debris into birds’ nests may be used as an indicator of environmental pollution.
Materials and Methods. Materials for this article included 382 nests of 42 passerine species. Nests were collected unevenly during the last two decades in different stations across the western part of Ukraine. Among them, 18.3 % of the nests were located within the borders of human settlements, 48.2 % on their outskirts, and 37.5 % in the natural or close to the natural environment far beyond settlements. Nests were decomposed with laboratory forceps and nest components were identifined as natural (grass, plant stems, tree leaves, grass roots, moss, mammalian hair, bird feather and others) and antropogenic (threads, synthetic fibers, fluff, ropes, fishing line, cigarette butts, paper, tissue, wires and others), and their percentage by volume was defined.
Results and Discussion. To construct nests, birds use antropogenic materials in the form of debris/solid waste, which they find in the surroundings. Among 382 analyzed passerine nests (42 species) collected in the west of Ukraine, artificial or man-changed materials were recorded in nest construction of 103 nests (27.0 %) of 26 species (61.9 %).
Most frequently antropogenic materials are incorporated in the nests of the Fringillidae family (Linaria cannabina – 85.7 % of the analysed nests, Chloris chloris – 71.4 %, Fringilla coelebs – 66.7 %).
The amount of artificial materials in the nest composition varied from minimal to up 100 %. More than a half (55.3 %) of the investigated passerine nests contain only a minimal or small amount of debris (≤ 1 % by volume).
We found 17 types of anthropogenic materials in the nests. The most popular were threads (in 47.1 % of the analyzed nests with antropogenic materials), synthetic fibers (31.7 %), fluff (20.2 %, among them artificial fluff 14.4 %, cotton wool 4.8 %, fiberglass 1.0 %), plastic film (17.4 %), ropes (14.4 %), and fishing line (12.5 %).
The number of various types of antropogenic materials in one nest varied from 1 (in 55.3 % nests), 2 (31.1 %), 3 (9.7 %), and 4 to 7 (3.9 %). The higher number of artificial material types in the structure of a bird’s nest may imply purposefulness of such beha­vior in the environment transformed by the human.
Some selectivity of the types of solid waste (debris) that birds use for nest construction was noted. We assume that in most cases birds use antropogenic materials closely resembling the traditional natural ones usually used by birds of certain species.
The new artificial components in the composition of the nest imply that nest buil­ding is not completely genetically programmed but there is a possibility to change it by adding something new – similar, or even different. It looks quite reasonable, as it facilitates adaptation in changed environments.
Using antropogenic materials as nest components is still controversial. The species specific look of the nest has changed by a different degree in polluted environments. It is still questionable weather such behavior is beneficial for birds in the long-term perspective.
We suppose that antropogenic components may have appeared as part of the nest in the environments with available solid waste. Intentional/unintentional substitution of some natural components for nest with antropogenic ones may occur because of their high resemblance. Sometimes debris is incorporated into the nest while suitable natural components are accessible. In a polluted environment the species specific appearance of a nest may change to a certain degree.
Conclusion. Passerine birds use antropogenic materials (in the form of debris) for nest construction quite often. Debris was found in nests of 26 passerines species. Synantropic species used various types of artificial materials more often. 17 types of various anthropogenic materials were found in the nests. Some selectivity was noted. Birds use antropogenic materials that resemble natural materials, but occasionally choose completely different ones.


Keywords


nest composition, antropogenic materials, debris, Passeriformes, the west of Ukraine

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antczak, M., Hromada, M., Czechowski, P., Tabor, J., Zabłocki, P., Grzybek, J., & Tryjanowski, P. (2010). A new material for old solutions - the case of plastic string used in Great Grey Shrike nests. Acta Ethologica, 13(2), 87-91. doi:10.1007/s10211-010-0077-2
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, I. E., Morgan, K. V., Bertin, M., Meddle, S. L., & Healy, S. D. (2014). Physical cognition: birds learn the structural efficacy of nest material. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1784), 20133225. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.3225
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Biddle, L. E., Broughton, R. E., Goodman, A. M., & Deeming, D. C. (2018). Composition of bird nests is a species-specific characteristic. Avian Biology Research, 11(2), 132-153. doi:10.3184/175815618x15222318755467
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bokotey, A. (1992). Ekologia okresu lęgowego makolągwy Acanthis cannabina na Zachodniej Ukrainie. Dynamika Populacji Ptakow. Slupsk, 147-149. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/41614381/Ekologia_okresu_lęgowego_makolągwy_Acanthis_cannabina_na_Zachodniej_Ukrainie

Bokotey, A. A., & Potapenko, V. A. (1990). O gnezdovanii sorok v metallicheskich gnezdach v cherte goroda Lvova [On nesting of Magpie in metal nests within the Lviv city]. Ornithology, 24, 123. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Bresgunova, O. A. (2008). Osobennosti gnezdovoy biologii soroki w Kharkovskoy oblasti [Peculiarities of breeding biology of the Black-billed Magpie in Kharkiv region]. Berkut, 17(1-2), 67-78. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292996216_Peculiarities_of_breeding_biology_of_Magpie_in_Kharkiv_region (In Russian)

Chaplygina, A. B., & Krivitsky, I. A. (1996). Ryabinnik v usloviyakh transformirovannykh landshaftov Khar'kovskoy oblasti [Fieldfare in conditions of transformed landscapes of Kharkiv region] Berkut, 5(2), 158-162. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

Franchuk, M. V. (2013). Vypadky netypovoho hnizduvannya drozda spivochoho Turdus philomelos. Troglodytes [Cases of unusual nesting of Song Thrush Turdus philomelos]. Troglodytes, 4, 35-39. (In Ukrainian)

Hansell, M., & Overhill, R. (2000). Animal builders and the importance of bird nests. In M. Hansell (Ed.), Bird nests and construction behaviour (pp. 1-22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139106788.001
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Igic, B., Cassey, P., Grim, P. S. T., & Hauber, M. E. (2009). Cigarette butts form a perceptually cryptic component of song thrush (Turdus philomelos) nests. Notornis, 56, 134-138.
Google Scholar

Jagiello, Z., Corsini, M., Dylewski, Ł., Ibáñez-Álamo, J. D., & Szulkin, M. (2022). The extended avian urban phenotype: anthropogenic solid waste pollution, nest design, and fitness. Science of The Total Environment, 838(2), 156034. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156034
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Jagiello, Z., Dylewski, Ł., Tobolka, M., & Aguirre, J. I. (2019). Life in a polluted world: a global review of anthropogenic materials in bird nests. Environmental Pollution, 251, 717-722. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.028
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Jagiello, Z. A., Dylewski, Ł., Winiarska, D., Zolnierowicz, K. M., & Tobolka, M. (2018). Factors determining the occurrence of anthropogenic materials in nests of the white stork Ciconia ciconia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(15), 14726-14733. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1626-x
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

James Reynolds, S., Ibáñez-Álamo, J. D., Sumasgutner, P., & Mainwaring, M. C. (2019). Urbanisation and nest building in birds: a review of threats and opportunities. Journal of Ornithology, 160(3), 841-860. doi:10.1007/s10336-019-01657-8
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Radhamany, D., Das, K. S., Azeez, P. A., Wen, L., & Sreekala, L. K. (2016). Usage of nest materials by house sparrow (Passer domesticus) along an urban to rural gradient in Coimbatore, India. Tropical Life Sciences Research, 27(2), 127-134. doi:10.21315/tlsr2016.27.2.10
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Škorpíková, V., Bělka, T., Štěpánek, P., & Horal, D. (2014). Data on birds recorded in Republic of Moldova in 2013 and 2014. Ciconia, 22(23), 43-47.
Google Scholar

Suárez-Rodríguez, M., & Garcia, C. M. (2017). An experimental demonstration that house finches add cigarette butts in response to ectoparasites. Journal of Avian Biology, 48(10), 1316-1321. doi:10.1111/jav.01324
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Suárez-Rodríguez, M., López-Rull, I., & Macías Garcia, C. (2013). Incorporation of cigarette butts into nests reduces nest ectoparasite load in urban birds: new ingredients for an old recipe? Biology Letters, 9(1), 20120931. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0931
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar

Suárez-Rodríguez, M., & Macías Garcia, C. (2014). There is no such a thing as a free cigarette; lining nests with discarded butts brings short-term benefits, but causes toxic damage. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27(12), 2719-2726. doi:10.1111/jeb.12531
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Surgey, J., Feu, C. R. D., & Deeming, D. C. (2012). Opportunistic use of a wool-like artificial material as lining of tit (Paridae) nests. The Condor, 114(2), 385-392. doi: 10.1525/cond.2012.110111
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Townsend, A. K., & Barker, C. M. (2014). Plastic and the nest entanglement of urban and agricultural crows. PLoS One, 9(1), e88006. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088006
CrossrefPubMedPMCGoogle Scholar


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Oksana Hnatyna

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.