ANALYSIS OF SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS VEGETATION COVER OF KHARKIV REGION

Ya. Yu. Dementieieva, S. V. Aseeva, L. Yu. Andrusenko, A. B. Chaplygina


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30970/sbi.1404.640

Abstract


Background. Determination of plant species diversity in the areas of solid waste landfills (hereinafter “landfills”) was carried out in order to identify patterns of vegetation cover and give an ecological assessment of the technocenosis. Plant species diversity was definedon the territories of Derhachiv and Rohan landfills in the city of Kharkiv.
Materials and Methods. The method of linear routes and trial areas was used to determine the number of species. The degree of coverage was measured by the Drude method. The degree of similarity was determined by calculating the Jacquard coefficient. Plants were systematized by species, life forms, life expectancy, types of cenomorphs.
Results and Discussion. 117 species have been recorded at Kharkiv landfills in total. At Rohan landfill and in the adjacent territories the vegetation cover is represented by 92 species, at Derhachiv landfill – by 93 species.  Because of the uneven distribution of vegetation in the territories, areas of landfills were identified according to the specifics of vegetation cover (4 for Derhachiv and 3 for Rohan landfills). The most pronounced species diversity of plants at Derhachiv landfill is in the zone of natural landscape (44.0 %), at Rohan landfill – in the zone of ruderal landscape (38.4 %). The obtained data were classified by plant species composition and the conditions of their existence. Herbaceous plants of Derhachiv and Rohan llandfills are dominant in terms of life forms – 83.8% and 85.8%, respectively. Perennial plants predominate in terms of life expectancy – 53.8 % and 52.2 %, respectively. By their practical use, landfill plants include medicinal (18.6 %), food (11.1 %), and honey (10.8 %) ones; phytomeliorant plants constitute the smallest part – 2.2 %. The Drude method was used to determine the degree of coverage. The dominant families at both landfills are Asteraceae (24.6 %) and Poaceae (13 %). Jacquard similarity coefficients ranged from 0.18 in the least similar zones to 0.75 in similar zones. Cj calculated for two landfills equals 0.11. The plants were systematized by cenomorphic affiliation. The leading type of cenomorph for the flora of landfills is ruderal species (Ru); a significant share is occupied by forest plants (Sil), meadow (Pr) and steppe (St) plant species.
Conclusions. Solid waste landfill sites are characterized by a high degree of transformation, which is clearly manifested in the vegetation formation patterns. The significant difference between the vegetation cover of landfill areas (Сj = 0.11) indicates a low degree of similarity of species diversity due to the specifics of technogenesis of the studied ecosystems, historical landscape and preconditions for the formation of vegetation. Natural grass cover on the landfills is replaced by ruderal and shrub cover, which indicates harsh living conditions for cultivated plants and succession processes. There are three main patterns of the formarion of vegetation cover in the landfills: as a result of severe disturbances, indigenous plants are replaced by ruderants in the process of succession, while uncharacteristic species are introduced by biotic and abiotic factors.


Keywords


vegetation cover, Derhachiv landfill, Rohan landfill, transformed landscapes, cenomorphic affiliation

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Alekseenko V.A., Alekseenko L.P. Geochemical barriers. Moscow: Logos, 2003. 144 p. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

2. Andrienko T.L., Peregrym M.M. Official lists of regional rare plants of administrative territories of Ukraine (reference book). Kyiv: Alterpress, 2012. 148 p. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

3. Alekhin V.V., Syreyshchikov D.P. Methods of field botanical research. Vologda: Severnyi pechatnik, 1926. 189 p. (In Russian)

4. Bilyk G.S. Ecological and coenotic features of vegetation cover of solid waste landfills on the territory of Lviv region. Scientific Principles of Biodiversity Conservation, 2011; 2(9), 1: 33-50. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

5. de Medeiros Engelmann P., dos Santos V.H.J.M., Barbieri C.B., Augustin A.H., Ketzer J.M.M., Rodrigues L.F. Environmental monitoring of a landfill area through the application of carbon stable isotopes, chemical parameters and multivariate analysis. Waste Management, 2018; 76: 591-605.
CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

6. Dobrochaeva D.N., Kotov M.I., Prokudin Yu.N. et al. The determinant of higher plants of Ukraine. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1987. 548 p. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

7. Evremenko N.S. Features of ruderal vegetation of territorial zones of Kryvyi Rih. Synanthropization of vegetation of Ukraine: III All-Ukrainian. Science. Conf., September 26-27, 2019, Kyiv. Collection of sciences. articles. Kyiv: Nash Format, 2019. P. 64-68. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

8. Glibovytska N. Environmental sustainability and phytomelioration suitability of woody plants in urban ecosystems. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series "Biology", 2017; 28: 12-21.
Google Scholar

9. Gurina I.V., Shchirenko A.I., Rogozina Y.S. The monitoring results of the second recultivated ash dump section of Novocherkassk SDP (state district power station). Scientific Journal of Russian RDI of Melioration Problems, 2016; 4(24): 55-69. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

10. Kharytonov M., Babenko M., Martynova N., Klimkina I., Heilmeier H. Testing of phytomeliorated dark - gray schist clay profile with miscanthus. Applied Biotechnology in Mining: Proceedings of the International Conference (Dnipro, April 25-27, 2018). Dnipro: National Technical University "Dnipro Polytechnic", 2018. P. 30.
Google Scholar

11. Leontyev D.V. Floristic analysis in mycology. Kharkiv: Osnova, 2007.160 p. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

12. Lutsevich A.A. Selection of flora of forest belts for reclamation of municipal solid waste landfills. Forestry Engineering Journal, 2015; 4(4): 21-25. (In Russian)
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

13. Mazhaisky Yu.F. Restoration of lands contaminated with heavy metals. Melioration and Water Management, 2001; (2): 34-36. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

14. Petruk V.G., Vasilkivskij I.V., Іshchenko V.A., Petruk R.V. Management and disposal of wastes. Part 3. Solid household wastes landfills. Vinnytsia: VNTU, 2013. 139 p. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

15. Popovich V.V. Phytomeliorative recovery in reduction of multi-element anomalies' influence of devastated landscapes. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 2016; 6(1): 94-114.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

16. Popovych V. Phytomelioration as a factor decommissioning landfills. Bulletin of Lviv State University of Life Safety, 2015; 11: 126-130. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

17. Prysedsky Yu.G., Lykholat Yu.V. Adaptation of plants to anthropogenic factors. Vinnytsia: Dnipro, 2017. 98 p. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

18. Ramos-Arcos S.A., López-Martínez S., Lagunas Rivera S., González-Mondragón E.G., de la Cruz Leyva M.C., Velázquez-Martínez J.R. Phytoremediation of landfill leachate using vetiver (Chrysopogon zizanioides) and cattail (Typha latifolia). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2019; 17(2): 2619-2630.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

19. Samoilyk M.S., Molchanova A.V. Ecological aspects of influence of solid domestic wastes on the environment. Filtrate. Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy, 2017; 1-2: 88-91. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

20. Serebryakov I.G. The main directions in the evolution of life forms in angiosperms. Bull. of Moskow Society of exp. Nature, dep. biology, 1955; 60(3): 71-91. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

21. Solid waste landfills. Basic design provisions 2005.
URL: https://www.minregion.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DBN-V.2.4-2-2005.pdf

22. Solomakha V.A., Kostyliov O.V., Sheliag-Sosonko Yu.R. Synanthropic vegetation of Ukraine. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 1992. 250 p. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

23. Tarasov V.V. Flora of the Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhya regions. Vascular plants with their biology-ecological characteristic. Dnipropetrovsk: Lira, 2012. 296 p. (In Ukrainian)
Google Scholar

24. Titova M. Filter plants and fungi accumulators. Phyto-purification secrets. Online Journal "Givoy Les". (In Russian)
URL: https://givoyles.ru/articles/lyudi-i-derevya/rasteniya-filtry-sekrety/

25. Varnavskaya I.V. Analysis of the conditions of formation and composition of wastewater of solid waste landfills. Ecology and Industry, 2008; 1: 39-43. (In Russian)
Google Scholar

26. Vaverková M.D., Winkler J., Adamcová D., Radziemska M., Uldrijan D., Zloch J. Municipal solid waste landfill – Vegetation succession in an area transformed by human impact. Ecological Engineering, 2019; 129: 109-114.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

27. http://www.mkpv.com.ua


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Studia Biologica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.